Biden's Infrastructure Week

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/03/22/infrastructure-biden-drug-reform/Screen Shot 2021-03-22 at 5.39.20 PM.png
White House officials are preparing to present President Biden with a roughly $3 trillion infrastructure and jobs package that includes high profile domestic policy priorities such as free community college and universal prekindergarten, according to three people familiar with internal discussions.

After completing the $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package this month, Biden administration officials are piecing together the next major legislative priority. While no final announcement has been made, the White House is expected to push a multitrillion jobs and infrastructure plan as the centerpiece of the president’s “Build Back Better” agenda.

That effort is expected to be broken into two parts — one focused on infrastructure, and the other focused on other domestic priorities, such as expanding the newly expanded child tax credit for several years. The people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations, stressed planning was preliminary and subject to change. Some aides stressed the package’s final price tag remains unclear.

Although still in the works, the sprawling legislative package follows weeks of uncertainty about Biden’s second big legislative effort and confusion among congressional lawmakers about the administration’s top priority.

The infrastructure and jobs bill is poised further define Biden’s presidency. The president has faced intense pressure, including from some Democrats, to scale back his domestic policy ambitions and work with congressional Republicans on more incremental legislation following his $1.9 trillion relief plan, which every Republican voted against.

Doing so, however, would require Biden to jettison many of his most consequential 2020 presidential campaign promises, while also frustrating much of his base and Democratic party leadership. Introducing a new $3 trillion package, which is expected to include tax hikes to offset spending, is sure to frustrate Republicans, setting up another acrimonious legislative fight. But it gives the president a chance to cement a domestic policy agenda beyond the emergency response to the pandemic.

“The country has not had a real infrastructure bill since Dwight Eisenhower set up the highway system. This could do more for American manufacturing and blue collar jobs than anything else,” said former Gov. Ed Rendell (D-Pa.), a proponent of infrastructure spending. “It’s crucial not just for Biden’s legacy but for the legacy of the American government in the next decade. It’s a seminal moment for the country."

Crucial decisions still have to be made about how the administration seeks to advance the measure. Congressional Republicans are unlikely to support trillions more in additional spending, or the tax hikes that the White House is eyeing to fund these initiatives. Also, it’s unclear what the appetite could be, even among congressional Democrats, to use reconciliation -- the budgetary procedure Democrats used to pass covid relief with just 51 votes in the Senate.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement that the administration had not decided on its next step. “President Biden and his team are considering a range of potential options for how to invest in working families and reform our tax code so it rewards work, not wealth," Psaki said. "Those conversations are ongoing, so any speculation about future economic proposals is premature and not a reflection of the White House’s thinking.”

Congressional Republicans have talked about supporting infrastructure spending but they’ve largely rejected Democratic proposals for doing so, particularly those that include investments in clean energy to combat climate change. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Monday warned on the Senate floor against a “so-called infrastructure proposal that may actually be a trojan horse for massive tax hikes and other job-killing left-wing policies.”

Biden’s proposal is expected to center around infrastructure spending, with hundreds of billions of dollars to repair the nation’s roads, bridges, waterways and rails. It also includes funding for retrofitting buildings, safety improvements, schools infrastructure, and low-income and tribal groups, as well as $100 billion for schools and education infrastructure.

The infrastructure component is expected to include $400 billion in spending to combat climate change, including $60 billion for infrastructure related to green transit and $46 billion for climate-related research and development. The plan also would aim to make electric-vehicle charging stations available across the country. The measure would also include $200 billion for housing infrastructure, including $100 billion to expand the supply of housing for low-income Americans.

The second component of the effort would include many of Biden’s other domestic priorities. Those include universal prekindergarten and free community college tuition. The package would also dramatically expand spending on child care. The measure would also extend for several years the expansion of the Child Tax Credit recently signed into law for just one year as part of the stimulus plan.
Biden has previously touted these initiatives as necessary parts of the “caregiving economy.”

The new legislation would also include extending subsidies for the Affordable Care Act, as well as free and reduced tuition at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

Biden is also expected to be presented with a menu of tax options by Treasury officials to fund the plan. Biden campaigned on raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, as well as increasing taxes on wealthy investors. It was not immediately clear which of his tax plans would be included in the final legislation.

“Anybody making more than $400,000 will see a small to a significant tax increase,” Biden said last week on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

White House officials are also planning to include a measure to force pharmaceutical companies to lower their prices or pay a steep penalty. The White House’s efforts are likely to be similar to the prescription drug bill unveiled by House Democrats in 2019, which aimed to respond to voter frustration over the rising costs of prescription drugs across the country, the people aware of the internal discussions said.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that House Democrats’ bill would save the government approximately $450 billion over the next decade. By lowering the cost of prescription drugs, the government would spend significantly less on Medicare and other public health programs.

Many details of the plan were first reported by the New York Times.

House Democrats pass broad prescription drug price bill as election marker

The emerging proposal comes amid an extensive debate among Democratic policymakers about the next steps for the Biden administration. Democrats’ left-flank is clamoring for the party to use its rare hold on power in Washington to approve long-held policy goals, from an expansion of health care to action on climate change. Democrats’ centrist wing, however, has expressed repeated unease about the party-line vote over pandemic relief, and has pushed for a return to bipartisan policymaking.

Republicans are in particular expected to oppose Biden’s tax hikes on businesses and rich people. That could complicate passage, particularly through the Senate, of any major Biden infrastructure package.

“The GOP won’t vote for these tax hikes. Why should they be the tax collectors for Biden’s spending spree?,” said Brian Riedl, a former aide to Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) now at the Manhattan Institute, a libertarian-leaning think-tank.

Still others point out that what Biden has proposed may not be sufficient to meet the challenge of climate change and a warming planet.

“If $3 trillion is what Biden’s team lands on, they’ll be neglecting what’s politically and publicly popular, and what’s quite frankly vital for the future of our society and our planet,” said Ellen Sciales, national press secretary for the youth-led Sunrise Movement.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
they said he won't forgive student loans and that's what i need..therefore some will get schooling and some not.:clap:
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
they said he won't forgive student loans and that's what i need..therefore some will get schooling and some not.:clap:
I am hoping that will be a 2024 agenda item if Biden does his job well and can ride off into the sunset.

I would love to have me and my wife's student loans wiped out too.

Im not sure how student loans would stop someone from going to school though.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I am hoping that will be a 2024 agenda item if Biden does his job well and can ride off into the sunset.

I would love to have me and my wife's student loans wiped out too.

Im not sure how student loans would stop someone from going to school though.


?
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
I hold out hope on student loan forgiveness, it really would be one hell of a boost to the economy. Not likely but eh, we will see. I do think biden will do a good job on education and that's something I strongly back so I am on board there.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I hold out hope on student loan forgiveness, it really would be one hell of a boost to the economy. Not likely but eh, we will see. I do think biden will do a good job on education and that's something I strongly back so I am on board there.
he already said he's not doing forgiveness..the have and have nots continue.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
they said he won't forgive student loans and that's what i need..therefore some will get schooling and some not.:clap:
School loans are not something that stops someone from going to school. Even if you already have them and get a shit degree, if you decide to go back to school those loans halt until you are out of school (more than half time I believe) for 6 months. So at anytime access to student loans are something that actually helps people to gain a education that would otherwise be unable to afford it.


I hold out hope on student loan forgiveness, it really would be one hell of a boost to the economy. Not likely but eh, we will see. I do think biden will do a good job on education and that's something I strongly back so I am on board there.
Agreed.

I would love to see Biden break the disinformation warfare that the right wing propaganda machine is cooking up and someone like Elizabeth Warren gets a shot.

he already said he's not doing forgiveness..the have and have nots continue.
He did say that the people who have been scammed can get their's forgiven. He was also toying around with a under 50k owed getting cleared out, but not sure where that is at the moment.
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
The 50k in forgiveness was still on the table last I saw, but I am really doubtful it will go anywhere. Any amount would be welcome, 10k seems to be getting tossed around more often. A midterm drubbing might make it attractive down the road to help woo folks to the polls when they aren't motivated by voting against trump.
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
I took several loans to help pay my way through college. Then over the next 11 years, I paid all of the principle and interest back!

That was the agreement that I signed, so that's what I did. Why would anyone think they should get out of that loan agreement?

You took the money, and used it for whatever you wanted, so pay it back!


:mrgreen:
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I took several loans to help pay my way through college. Then over the next 11 years, I paid all of the principle and interest back!

That was the agreement that I signed, so that's what I did. Why would anyone think they should get out of that loan agreement?

You took the money, and used it for whatever you wanted, so pay it back!


:mrgreen:
It used to be college was a lot cheaper, you could work a summer job and pay your way through, many state colleges and technical schools were free. Back in the 60's and 70's higher education was cheap, now it's a lifetime burden, we need to use a different yardstick than the past, kids have been getting fucked for decades on education and predatory student loans. Used to be many didn't pay back student loans and got away with it they were so easy to obtain and abuse.

Many Americans come to Canada for a better deal on higher education.

Since you were a vet, I imagine things were financially easier for education.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-075c370920e8b38499a66372e9845af2
Screen Shot 2021-04-04 at 11.11.46 AM.png
The problems with U.S. broadband networks have been obvious for years. Service costs more than in many other rich nations, it still doesn’t reach tens of millions of Americans and the companies that provide it don’t face much competition.

Now the Biden administration is promising to do something about all of those issues as part of its proposed $2.3 trillion infrastructure package. The plan, which would devote $100 billion to get all Americans connected, is more idea than policy and lacks a lot of important detail.

But it sketches out a striking new vision of activist government measures intended to improve high-speed internet service, following decades in which the government has largely left the job to private companies.


WHAT IS BIDEN’S PROPOSAL?


It would spend $100 billion to “future-proof” broadband as part of an eight-year infrastructure plan, calling high-speed connections “the new electricity” that’s now a necessity for all Americans. (For history buffs, that’s a reference to the Rural Electrification Act — Depression-era legislation that sped the extension of power lines to farms and rural communities.)

It could signal a major policy shift toward lowering the high cost of internet service, rather than just handing money to broadband providers for building out networks. “Americans pay too much for internet,” the plan bluntly states.

It pushes for greater competition that could lower prices, by encouraging and supporting networks owned or affiliated with local governments, cooperatives and nonprofit organizations. Currently, roughly 20 states restrict municipal broadband. Prioritizing such networks could give them a leg up when the government doles out money for extending service.

“The most important thing about what President Biden has done in the proposal is that he’s redefined the digital divide,” said Larry Irving, a top telecom official in the Clinton administration. “The simple act of recognizing that poverty is a bigger indicator of lack of access than geography is a huge statement.”

It’s not clear how the Biden administration plans to bring that about.


WHY IS THIS NECESSARY?

The pandemic has made clear that millions of Americans are not online, a problem that isn’t limited to rural areas but includes cities too. The White House says more than 30 million Americans don’t have access to high-speed internet at all, and millions more can’t afford it.

The divide persists even after the government has spent billions encouraging broadband providers to connect far-flung and often isolated communities. From 2009 through 2017, federal spending on such programs totaled $47.3 billion, according to a government watchdog report. An additional $20 billion is lined up over the next decade for rural broadband, and another $9 billion for high-speed wireless internet called 5G in sparsely populated regions. Billions more flowed to broadband from the three huge relief packages enacted during the pandemic.

America’s rural-internet policy has been an ongoing mistake, said Gigi Sohn, an official in the Obama-era FCC. “A lot of what we have is very slow,” she said. The White House now says it wants “future-proof” networks “in unserved and underserved areas,” so they don’t have to be rebuilt again years later because they’re out-of-date.

Exactly what those terms means for what gets built and where isn’t clear, either, and many Republicans oppose putting federal funds to work in areas that do have internet even if it’s slow — what’s called “overbuilding.”


WILL CONGRESS SUPPORT THIS PLAN?

The $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan has its detractors. Some Democrats are disappointed because they wanted more. On the other hand, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called it a “Trojan horse” for tax hikes.

Internet access is a bipartisan issue, but Republican leaders of the House and Senate Commerce committees called Biden’s approach on broadband wasteful.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington, the Republican ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said Biden’s plan would “hurt private investment in our networks without actually closing the digital divide.” She called for trimming regulations on building infrastructure to help prompt investment. Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, the Republican ranking member of Senate Commerce, said the proposal “opens the door for duplication and overbuilding.”

Congressional Democrats have recently introduced major broadband legislation of their own, including a $94 billion bill from Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina, the House Majority Whip, who both said they approved of the White House’s approach.

Republicans’ concerns echo those from industry. The cable lobbying group NCTA said the White House “risks taking a serious wrong turn ... by suggesting that the government is better suited than private-sector technologists to build and operate the internet.” The NCTA also said it was worried about price regulation. The Biden document does not mention price controls.

Jonathan Spalter, CEO of the lobbying group USTelecom, said that prioritizing investments in government-owned broadband is “exactly the wrong approach” since taxpayers will get the bill if such networks fail. He also claimed that broadband prices are already falling.

The Labor Department says pricing for telephone services, which includes internet plans along with phone service, has dropped about 7% over the past decade. Internet service costs, which include things like web hosting, have risen 2%. A think tank with a lot of tech-industry funding, New America, says prices are higher in the U.S. compared with Asia and Europe.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I took several loans to help pay my way through college. Then over the next 11 years, I paid all of the principle and interest back!

That was the agreement that I signed, so that's what I did. Why would anyone think they should get out of that loan agreement?

You took the money, and used it for whatever you wanted, so pay it back!


:mrgreen:
there actually are things beyond your control that the college can do and they hold your degree until you make good. so naughty. being poor is expensive and everyone takes advantage even those nice college leadership people.

college is a for profit business.
 
Top