My complaint is with some of the arguments, like you probably wouldn't call it "experimental" knowing some more about it. The process for approving medicine and medical equipment is gnarly, as in, if you want to redesign a frigging scalpel handle, don't even bother unless your research packet is as thick as War and Peace. We might envision the emergency use authorization as being a tube that bypasses the normal process in total cowboy mode, but that's not even close to reality. The threshold for emergency use is still ten times higher than what's required to change a seatbelt or airbag design in a new car. You couldn't even begin this process without having a pretty good idea to begin with using known components.
Nobody here is saying that. I think you're perceiving the attack on your arguments as being the same as thinking these vaccines are miracle cures. I've made a point to mention what that 90% represents. No offense here, but it was yourself that didn't understand what the number represented.