I'm confused about how he can be convicted of both killing someone intentionally and unintentionally at the same time.
I did find this:
To find Chauvin guilty of the 3 murder and manslaughter charges, the jury had to conclude the killing of George Floyd last May was unintentional but done with negligence and reckless disregard for …
www.ocregister.com
And they state that they found him guilty of second degree murder while not intending to kill Floyd, but the definition of second degree murder is just straight up intentionally killing someone, but without premeditation.
After the closing arguments, I remember them talking about an aggravated enhancement where Chauvin had the choice of having the judge or jury decide that and he chose the judge. Does that have something to do with it?
Regardless, it's a great result for the country.