Snowback
Well-Known Member
That wasn't my experience. I received the appropriate freebies and not great but acceptable customer service over the course of four different orders if I remember correctly. As for email and personal info, thanks for letting me know, but I am protected for reasons that I don't need to get into here. Do you have experience with them yourself? When you order from him, he gives you his own address for payment and not a PO box or other post office account and I have looked up the house, which is a detached house on a residential street. So it would be pretty easy to cause trouble for him or for one of his buddies if he pulled those sorts of shenanigans.https://www.canadaseedz.ca Has a lot bad reviews on IG. The selection is awesome, The customer service is garbage. You can't buy seeds from another bank or he will block you from his site and IG, You can't repost anything from other seeds banks because he will block you, He hardly ever sends freebies even thought the seed breeders say they gave him freebies to give away, and he goes around reporting other Canadian Seeds banks. He has paid people to report accounts until they have been banned on IG. and FYI If you have ever ordered from https://www.canadaseedz.ca your personal info was sold is and is now online (Your name address email and payment mention)
Personal anecdote: He used to allow the buyer to choose their own freebies. He sent the wrong freebies to me once and I complained, with respectful language. He sent me the freebies that I wanted and paid for shipping out of his own pocket, let me keep the originals, and sent an entire additional pack of Ethos Genetics (on an order that was originally for In House Genetics), so basically triple freebies. It's been a while since I ordered from him so maybe he is different now, but he never stiffed me on freebies.
It's strange that those other people all had such bad experiences. I must be special, or perhaps there are some BS reviews out there from haters? And who allegedly has my "personal info" been sold to? What evidence did those reviewers supply for such a serious accusation?