There's alot of relevant science that basically sits on the shelf. But it's catching up. Hydrology is becoming more popular as a political topic in drought effected areas. Some governments (China, Israel, India) are making serious investments in large scale implementation of regenerative designs.
Here's a micro-doc with one of those guys:
But yeah, the play the timber industry made was to equate heavier logging with wildfire prevention/prep... And the bio-mass industry seems to be putting that on repeat.
Now, granted, there is massive amount of forest here that is overgrown, but as a consequence of the disturbance to the natural succession of the forest. You clear a spot and everything that grows to fill the canopy is close to the same age. The wood is less dense than shade grown trees, unhealthy and will never reach the maturity of shade grown trees, which will eventually succeed them - but only if the forest is left untouched.
If you've ever walked around woods that have been hit with a single species replant (Doug fir here) it's very obvious how dangerous the environment we are creating is for wildfire.
I just feel that there is very low awareness of how and why desertification takes place... It doesn't require a change in annual rainfall. We have that too so it goes faster, but it would basically go the same way just due to human presence.