Trump's attempted coup and R congress people

How possibly does that matter? He was assailed inside the building.

View attachment 4970915
It was falsely reported by CNN that someone hit a policeman with a fire extinguisher, and killed him.This did not happen. The man had a heart attack the next day at home. The facts actually do matter. If you look at the facts, you will see that this was not an organized event, and that there were plenty of FBI informant, and film crews, at the event. I’ve lived in Argentina. They had military Coups. This was trespassing.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
Using violence to trespass into the capitol for the purpose of stopping an election tally is a coup.

Your delusion is stunning.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
It was falsely reported by CNN that someone hit a policeman with a fire extinguisher, and killed him.This did not happen. The man had a heart attack the next day at home. The facts actually do matter. If you look at the facts, you will see that this was not an organized event, and that there were plenty of FBI informant, and film crews, at the event. I’ve lived in Argentina. They had military Coups. This was trespassing.
Link please
 

printer

Well-Known Member
"Nearly 235 defendants have been charged with corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so."

Not quite an insurrection, in part because no one was at home when they came knocking. So about all they could do was take selfies. That one cop that drew the rabble away from the politicians probably changed the course of history that day. Not that the rabble would have been successful in the end but rather the attack may have included the country's representatives being held or threatened. That may have bumped it up to an insurrection. But when it is only the security forces fighting off the rabble, that is only assult and destruction of property.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
It was falsely reported by CNN that someone hit a policeman with a fire extinguisher, and killed him.This did not happen.
Screen Shot 2021-08-23 at 1.21.24 PM.png

The man had a heart attack the next day at home. The facts actually do matter. If you look at the facts, you will see that this was not an organized event, and that there were plenty of FBI informant, and film crews, at the event. I’ve lived in Argentina. They had military Coups. This was trespassing.
No it wasn't 'trespassing'.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
"Nearly 235 defendants have been charged with corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so."

Not quite an insurrection, in part because no one was at home when they came knocking. So about all they could do was take selfies. That one cop that drew the rabble away from the politicians probably changed the course of history that day. Not that the rabble would have been successful in the end but rather the attack may have included the country's representatives being held or threatened. That may have bumped it up to an insurrection. But when it is only the security forces fighting off the rabble, that is only assult and destruction of property.
Nobody was at home then either.

1629739712534.png
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
I can't help but laugh when I see the guy walking out with the podium.

His wife must be piiiiiiiiissed having to foot the bill for his shit.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
It was falsely reported by CNN that someone hit a policeman with a fire extinguisher, and killed him.This did not happen. The man had a heart attack the next day at home. The facts actually do matter. If you look at the facts, you will see that this was not an organized event, and that there were plenty of FBI informant, and film crews, at the event. I’ve lived in Argentina. They had military Coups. This was trespassing.
Can you direct me to the proof of the Jewish lasers and Trumps election theft?
Pics work best
Thanks in advance
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Giuliani Criminal Associate Igor Fruman to Plead Guilty; Phone Subpoenas for Members of Congress

Two good news stories broke today on the justice front:

1. Rudy Giuliani's criminal associate, Igor Fruman, will be pleading guilty in federal court in New York on Wednesday. This spells real trouble for not only Rudy Giuliani but for Donald Trump as well.
2. The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection took steps today signaling that the committee will be subpoenaing the cell phone records of members of Congress to explore their possible complicity in the insurrection.

These two stories move us, if only incrementally, in the direction of justice.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Giuliani Criminal Associate Igor Fruman to Plead Guilty; Phone Subpoenas for Members of Congress

Two good news stories broke today on the justice front:

1. Rudy Giuliani's criminal associate, Igor Fruman, will be pleading guilty in federal court in New York on Wednesday. This spells real trouble for not only Rudy Giuliani but for Donald Trump as well.
2. The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection took steps today signaling that the committee will be subpoenaing the cell phone records of members of Congress to explore their possible complicity in the insurrection.

These two stories move us, if only incrementally, in the direction of justice.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
House Select Committee Demands Records Relating to 1/6 Attack for Trump, his Family, Advisors & More

The House Select Committee on the January 6 Capitol attack has signaled that it is conducting a massive investigation - some might even call it a sweeping and systematic - into the insurrection. The House Committee just demanded information across multiple executive branch agencies, specifically seeking information and records about Donald Trump, Don Jr., Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Eric Trump, Lara Trump, Mark Meadows, Dan Scavino, Stephen Miller, Robert O'Brien, Chad Wolf, Jeffrey Clark, Christopher Miller, Pat Cipollone, Peter Navarro, Kayleigh McEnany, Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, Alex Jones, George Papadopolous, Mike Lindell and others.

The House Committee seems to be conducting the kind of massive, wide-ranging investigation that the Department of Justice should be (and likely is) conducting into the insurrection.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Good luck Donald, Executive privilege doesn't include insurrection, crime, or to things you confessed to in public. Keep it up and move the whole hot mess closer to the 2022 election, you're not on the ballot BTW, but several republican witnesses will be...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Trump rages at 'pathetic' Capitol riot committee amid reports they want documents on his 'mental stability'
I'd say remand him for a 60 day psychiatric evaluation and report, then make it public, include the IQ test results too.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Why Trump’s threats to block Jan. 6 committee won't work: former FBI deputy

Former President Donald Trump was made aware of the subpoenas for documents requested of his former administration and he's threatening to invoke his power as the president. There's just one problem: he's not the president anymore.

After the statement from Trump was reported, legal experts explained that his attempts are likely to be difficult.

In July, the New York Times and Politico reported that the Department of Justice has now informed Trump administration witnesses that it "does not support an assertion of executive privilege — in its presidential communications" and "deliberative process." The department then advised witnesses in other cases that they can give "unrestricted testimony," which is how it was revealed Trump tried to manipulate the Justice Department to overthrow the 2020 election.

The thought is that executive privilege would protect the administration's confidential communication as it relates to what's going on in the administration. If the administration no longer exists, are those protections necessary given that the communications are no longer related to what's going on in the administration?

It "would not be appropriate to assert executive privilege with respect to communications with former President Trump and his advisers and staff on matters related to the committee's proposed interviews," the DOJ said in their decision.

Speaking to CNN on Wednesday, former FBI deputy director Andy McCabe told Don Lemon that he has been skeptical of the committee, but seeing this request today "is a very good sign that they are, in fact, embracing all the possible aspects of this attack on our democracy."

Lemon mentioned that the committee is asking about information involving Trump's children and his wife, which isn't typically something congressional committees seek. But McCabe explained that during that Jan. 6 rally his children were also there. There have been at least two books published that talked about the role Ivanka Trump played on Jan. 6 in persuading her father to stop the violence. So, while it may be unusual in most cases, there is a reason for this one.

"As you mentioned, we've all been down this road before, but there's a lot at stake here in this request," he went on. "And every agency, every entity, the National Archives are not going to be able to wholesale deny the requests simply because the president may be mounting some sort of a legal challenge. You know, the National Archives — we have laws and regulations in this country that require the National Archives to preserve these sorts of records for exactly this purpose. So, we may end up litigating around the edges, particularly around some of the specific White House information, but there's a lot of that the other agencies have to offer here, and I think there's -- you know, we'll probably have more success getting information from DHS, from the FBI and from DOJ."

See the video below:

 

printer

Well-Known Member

Trump rages at 'pathetic' Capitol riot committee amid reports they want documents on his 'mental stability'
I'd say remand him for a 60 day psychiatric evaluation and report, then make it public, include the IQ test results too.
Maybe his niece can do it?
 
Top