January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.
- Thread starter hanimmal
- Start date
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Translation: "White genocide exists but all I have are these prepared propaganda posters to show for it."
I don't see it.
So, then, go on for days. Describe the negative impacts.
I don't see it.
rabbita78
Well-Known Member
TRANSLATION - the evidence against us is overwhelming but im going to keep pretending im an unbiased juror on my own trial
good luck with that Charlie
!
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
How have you been harmed due to white racism?
You have nothing to back up your claims. You are complaining because you believe you've been harmed. What a snowflake. Regardless of skin color, people who cry over nothing are pussies.
printer
Well-Known Member
Back to what the thread is really about rather than a poster liking the sound of her voice (sorry, not fair to real women).
Banks fights Jan. 6 committee effort to seek lawmaker records
The pushback from Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) comes after committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) told reporters this week that he plans to ask telecommunications companies to turn over the records of several hundred people, including lawmakers.
“Rifling through the call logs of your colleagues would depart from more than 230 years of Congressional oversight. This type of authoritarian undertaking has no place in the House of Representatives and the information you seek has no conceivable legislative purpose," Banks wrote in a letter to Thompson that was also sent to the general counsels of AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon.
The Indiana Republican called the push for records "a desperate partisan act that would only further reveal the political nature of the Select Committee."
Banks was at one point slated to serve on the very committee whose efforts he is now seeking to stall. His selection, along with that of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), was opposed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) due to “concern about statements made and actions taken by these members.”
Banks suggested that Congress’s subpoena power is “subject to several limits” and that “recipients of legislative subpoenas retain their constitutional rights throughout the course of an investigation” — something he claims includes “the ability of the individuals to challenge the collection and release of their private telecommunication records” before Congress collects them.
The cases he pointed to, however, largely cover disputes between the executive branch as it has sought to withhold records from Congress, including a recent case where Trump fought efforts to obtain his tax returns.
And it is often telecom companies, not the entity presenting the subpoena, that alert people their records are being sought — giving them an opportunity to challenge the seizure.
thehill.com
Banks fights Jan. 6 committee effort to seek lawmaker records
The pushback from Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) comes after committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) told reporters this week that he plans to ask telecommunications companies to turn over the records of several hundred people, including lawmakers.
“Rifling through the call logs of your colleagues would depart from more than 230 years of Congressional oversight. This type of authoritarian undertaking has no place in the House of Representatives and the information you seek has no conceivable legislative purpose," Banks wrote in a letter to Thompson that was also sent to the general counsels of AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon.
The Indiana Republican called the push for records "a desperate partisan act that would only further reveal the political nature of the Select Committee."
Banks was at one point slated to serve on the very committee whose efforts he is now seeking to stall. His selection, along with that of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), was opposed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) due to “concern about statements made and actions taken by these members.”
Banks suggested that Congress’s subpoena power is “subject to several limits” and that “recipients of legislative subpoenas retain their constitutional rights throughout the course of an investigation” — something he claims includes “the ability of the individuals to challenge the collection and release of their private telecommunication records” before Congress collects them.
The cases he pointed to, however, largely cover disputes between the executive branch as it has sought to withhold records from Congress, including a recent case where Trump fought efforts to obtain his tax returns.
And it is often telecom companies, not the entity presenting the subpoena, that alert people their records are being sought — giving them an opportunity to challenge the seizure.
Banks fights Jan. 6 committee effort to seek lawmaker records
One House Republican is gearing up to fight an effort from the committee probing the Jan. 6 Capitol attack to collect the communications of members of Congress.The pushback from Rep. Jim Banks…
thehill.com
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
‘Our President Wants Us Here’: The Mob That Stormed the Capitol
They came from around the country with different affiliations — QAnon, Proud Boys, elected officials, everyday Americans — united by one allegiance.
www.nytimes.com
Excerpt:
Couy Griffin, 47, a Republican county commissioner from New Mexico, spoke of organizing another Capitol rally soon — one that could result in “blood running out of that building” — in a video he later posted to the Facebook page of his group, Cowboys for Trump. “At the end of the day, you mark my word, we will plant our flag on the desk of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer,” he said. He paused before adding, “And Donald J. Trump if it boils down to it.”
So, yeah, it's not all about Trump. White supremacist terrorists are willing to discard him when he is no longer useful. Radicals are like that.
They came from around the country with different affiliations — QAnon, Proud Boys, elected officials, everyday Americans — united by one allegiance.
‘Our President Wants Us Here’: The Mob That Stormed the Capitol (Published 2021)
They came from around the country with different affiliations — QAnon, Proud Boys, elected officials, everyday Americans — united by one allegiance.
Excerpt:
Couy Griffin, 47, a Republican county commissioner from New Mexico, spoke of organizing another Capitol rally soon — one that could result in “blood running out of that building” — in a video he later posted to the Facebook page of his group, Cowboys for Trump. “At the end of the day, you mark my word, we will plant our flag on the desk of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer,” he said. He paused before adding, “And Donald J. Trump if it boils down to it.”
So, yeah, it's not all about Trump. White supremacist terrorists are willing to discard him when he is no longer useful. Radicals are like that.
CatHedral
Well-Known Member
lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies
Last edited by a moderator:
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
God Newsmax is exploiting the radicalized husband of the domestic terrorist that got her self killed 'storming the capital'. Even going to the bullshit of him wearing a mask being the real problem.
It is like watching terrorist TV. "He shouldn't have had a gun" was something said by the propagandist tv personality.
Here is the actual interview of the guy who was protecting the congress.
And here is the video of the domestic terrorists trying to get through the doors to be able to murder congress people.
It is like watching terrorist TV. "He shouldn't have had a gun" was something said by the propagandist tv personality.
Here is the actual interview of the guy who was protecting the congress.
And here is the video of the domestic terrorists trying to get through the doors to be able to murder congress people.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
"I spoke with him that day, after? I think after. I don't know if I spoke with him in the morning or not. I just don't know…I don't know when those conversations happened,"
printer
Well-Known Member
I think his wife picked up."I spoke with him that day, after? I think after. I don't know if I spoke with him in the morning or not. I just don't know…I don't know when those conversations happened,"
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
Just one of those interesting coincidences:Back to what the thread is really about rather than a poster liking the sound of her voice (sorry, not fair to real women).
Banks fights Jan. 6 committee effort to seek lawmaker records
The pushback from Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) comes after committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) told reporters this week that he plans to ask telecommunications companies to turn over the records of several hundred people, including lawmakers.
“Rifling through the call logs of your colleagues would depart from more than 230 years of Congressional oversight. This type of authoritarian undertaking has no place in the House of Representatives and the information you seek has no conceivable legislative purpose," Banks wrote in a letter to Thompson that was also sent to the general counsels of AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon.
The Indiana Republican called the push for records "a desperate partisan act that would only further reveal the political nature of the Select Committee."
Banks was at one point slated to serve on the very committee whose efforts he is now seeking to stall. His selection, along with that of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), was opposed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) due to “concern about statements made and actions taken by these members.”
Banks suggested that Congress’s subpoena power is “subject to several limits” and that “recipients of legislative subpoenas retain their constitutional rights throughout the course of an investigation” — something he claims includes “the ability of the individuals to challenge the collection and release of their private telecommunication records” before Congress collects them.
The cases he pointed to, however, largely cover disputes between the executive branch as it has sought to withhold records from Congress, including a recent case where Trump fought efforts to obtain his tax returns.
And it is often telecom companies, not the entity presenting the subpoena, that alert people their records are being sought — giving them an opportunity to challenge the seizure.
Banks fights Jan. 6 committee effort to seek lawmaker records
One House Republican is gearing up to fight an effort from the committee probing the Jan. 6 Capitol attack to collect the communications of members of Congress.The pushback from Rep. Jim Banks…
Banks' son works for Tucker Carlson.
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
oops. had it backwards. Tucker's son works for Banks.
Banks hires son of Fox News host Carlson
U.S. Rep. Jim Banks, R-3rd, has hired the son of Fox News political commentator Tucker Carlson.
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
I believe they will plead the 5th and say it’s because the commission is a sham, not because they’re guilty of anything.
www.rawstory.com
GOP lawmakers may be confronted with taking the 5th if subpoenaed over Capitol riot: legal analyst
Responding to a CNN report that the House committee investigating the January 6 Capitol riot has asked telecommunications companies to preserve the phone records of close to a dozen Republican lawmakers, a former prosecutor suggested the development could lead to subpoenas and possible legal...
www.rawstory.com
topcat
Well-Known Member
C'mon man, throw strikes. Ball two.
printer
Well-Known Member
McCarthy says GOP 'will not forget' if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Tuesday that Republicans “will not forget” if telecommunications companies turn phone and email records over to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
The comment follows the select committee sending letters to 35 companies Monday asking them to preserve a number of records — something McCarthy argues “would put every American with a phone or computer in the crosshairs of a surveillance state run by Democratic politicians.”
The letters do not reveal whose information is being sought but specifically ask for the records of those involved in rallies to protest the certification of election results — a group that includes lawmakers.
“If these companies comply with the Democrat order to turn over private information, they are in violation of federal law and subject to losing their ability to operate in the United States,” McCarthy wrote.
McCarthy did not cite which law prohibits telecommunications companies from complying with the committee’s request.
“If companies still choose to violate federal law, a Republican majority will not forget and will stand with Americans to hold them fully accountable under the law,” he said.
Monday’s letters are not formal subpoenas, but they do ask the companies to maintain the confidentiality of those whose information is being requested.
”If you are not able or willing to respond to this request without alerting the subscribers or the accounts, please contact the Select Committee prior to proceeding,” the committee wrote in several of the letters.
The committee sent the letters to a wide variety of companies, including communications giants such as Google and Microsoft and all major cellphone carriers. They also include requests to encrypted messaging app Signal, right-leaning social media networks such as Parler, and more fringe websites such as 4chan and Gab.
Communications companies often seek to alert those whose records are being sought, a practice companies such as Google recently fought for as the Department of Justice under former President Trump initiated seizures of communications records from journalists.
While another request sent to many of the same companies last week asked for troves of data about disinformation surrounding the election as well as their internal reviews of different extremist groups, Monday’s letters asked the companies to retain records related more specifically to the unnamed individuals.
The letter to Google asks for all email messages, Google Drive files, and location history and deletion records. The request to Facebook and Twitter likewise asks for all communications. The phone companies included in the request have been asked to retain all text messages, cell site location data and call data, which would show who called whom and detail how long they spoke. Letters to the other websites ask more broadly for user data.
A Select Committee spokesman said the panel wouldn't be "deterred" in response to McCarthy's statement.
“The Select Committee is investigating the violent attack on the Capitol and attempt to overturn the results of last year’s election," the statement read. "We’ve asked companies not to destroy records that may help answer questions for the American people. The committee’s efforts won’t be deterred by those who want to whitewash or cover up the events of January 6th, or obstruct our investigation.”
thehill.com
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Tuesday that Republicans “will not forget” if telecommunications companies turn phone and email records over to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
The comment follows the select committee sending letters to 35 companies Monday asking them to preserve a number of records — something McCarthy argues “would put every American with a phone or computer in the crosshairs of a surveillance state run by Democratic politicians.”
The letters do not reveal whose information is being sought but specifically ask for the records of those involved in rallies to protest the certification of election results — a group that includes lawmakers.
“If these companies comply with the Democrat order to turn over private information, they are in violation of federal law and subject to losing their ability to operate in the United States,” McCarthy wrote.
McCarthy did not cite which law prohibits telecommunications companies from complying with the committee’s request.
“If companies still choose to violate federal law, a Republican majority will not forget and will stand with Americans to hold them fully accountable under the law,” he said.
Monday’s letters are not formal subpoenas, but they do ask the companies to maintain the confidentiality of those whose information is being requested.
”If you are not able or willing to respond to this request without alerting the subscribers or the accounts, please contact the Select Committee prior to proceeding,” the committee wrote in several of the letters.
The committee sent the letters to a wide variety of companies, including communications giants such as Google and Microsoft and all major cellphone carriers. They also include requests to encrypted messaging app Signal, right-leaning social media networks such as Parler, and more fringe websites such as 4chan and Gab.
Communications companies often seek to alert those whose records are being sought, a practice companies such as Google recently fought for as the Department of Justice under former President Trump initiated seizures of communications records from journalists.
While another request sent to many of the same companies last week asked for troves of data about disinformation surrounding the election as well as their internal reviews of different extremist groups, Monday’s letters asked the companies to retain records related more specifically to the unnamed individuals.
The letter to Google asks for all email messages, Google Drive files, and location history and deletion records. The request to Facebook and Twitter likewise asks for all communications. The phone companies included in the request have been asked to retain all text messages, cell site location data and call data, which would show who called whom and detail how long they spoke. Letters to the other websites ask more broadly for user data.
A Select Committee spokesman said the panel wouldn't be "deterred" in response to McCarthy's statement.
“The Select Committee is investigating the violent attack on the Capitol and attempt to overturn the results of last year’s election," the statement read. "We’ve asked companies not to destroy records that may help answer questions for the American people. The committee’s efforts won’t be deterred by those who want to whitewash or cover up the events of January 6th, or obstruct our investigation.”
McCarthy says GOP ‘will not forget’ if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Tuesday that Republicans “will not forget” if telecommunications companies turn phone and email records over to the House committee investi…
thehill.com