there is an article in the lancet that says there may be a legitimate use in the treatment of covid, but only in certain cases and under certain conditions. it also says that there was a slight decrease in viral loading, and less incidence of hyposmia (loss of the sense of smell), that there was no difference in nasal swabs between people given invermectin and those who had not, and that this was an in vitro (conducted outside of a living being) study, and that in vivo testing was needed.
So how do you go from "there may be some small benefit, but further testing is needed" to "Take a huge dose of this chemical that is intended for animals that outweigh by at least a factor of 4, and more likely, a factor of 10..." ? what logical process leads you to grasp at straws to avoid vaccines that have been administered to more than 5 BILLION people world wide with very, very limited adverse effects?
i have very little faith in the government, but they have absolutley no need to perpetrate huge scams to achieve any shady goals they might have in mind. the government has access to pretty much anything they want access to, and they're the body that inspects food and medicine for purity, not to mention the water supplies of every major city in the country. If they had ulterior motives, they could just carry them out, and who would even know they were doing anything?
www.mississippifreepress.org
www.bu.edu
