Properly flush weed vs unflush weed
- Thread starter NoobgrowerLbc
- Start date
I kind of feel sorry for you because I am working under the assumption that you are exactly what you say you are. There is a difference between fan leafs dying off towards the end of the life cycle which does happen to some plants but not others, some plants look absolutely healthy till you chop them down, but what people are showing you is not that, what people are pointing out to you is somebody who can't keep his plants healthy. The rest of us can take a look at this pics and see that, you obviously can't. Instead you are relying on whatever he is telling you. Again I don't know the guy, maybe he himself doesn't recognize the difference, but I just wanted to let you know, there is a huge difference.
WTF are all those stems and fan leafs doing in there? Apparently he can't trim worth shit either.
Watch a video tired of having to explain to ignorant people
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Millennials these days think YouTube is research. It isn't.
Once again did I say it was research? No you guys were trying to compare your way better bud lol you old heads are stubborn and egotistical
guess it just comes with the age gotta give credit where it’s due. Here’s a hug for all you grumpy old heads
Star Dog
Well-Known Member
It’s nothing to do with ego or age look at the state of the plants in the screenshot, idk the guy from Adam but imo he's less than average, keeping plants healthy to perform at peak is the mark of a good grower.Once again did I say it was research? No you guys were trying to compare your way better bud lol you old heads are stubborn and egotistical
I understand keeping plants at peak but those are the end when he stops feeding water and let’s them dry out for the 2 days of darkness they skim thru the videos and don’t see how the buds look or how the plant looks mid flower it only looks burnt in the final ¡2 days!
hotrodharley
Well-Known Member
Dry out for the 2 days of darkness. Lol. GTFOH with that silliness.
Another ignorant person watxh his videos!!! Then come talk to me lol everybody talks but doesn’t watch his process
twentyeight.threefive
Well-Known Member
Ignorant would be thinking that 2 days of darkness gives any positive effects.
DCcan
Well-Known Member
That is editing, no way they look like that in 2 days...You keep citing the edited videos like it's the word of God delivered to Moses.
Moses did some editing too, before he returned to the tribe...God gave him cooking tips apparently.
Lol okay don’t know the exact studies but I’m pretty sure 95 percent of growers do that
There’s no editing like I’ve stated multiple times watch his video hard for people to learn when they don’t watch the videos
twentyeight.threefive
Well-Known Member
Studies have shown it does nothing. And you thinking 95% of growers do that just shows how ignorant you are.
My plants get like 2 weeks of darkness after I chop though.
Congratulations you are part of the 5 percent that doesn’t
twentyeight.threefive
Well-Known Member
I love how you just make up statistics. Have you recently done a poll? Where did you come up with that number?
Wastei
Well-Known Member
Buddy they look airy and leafy. You see that clear as day from distance and they're very underdeveloped. If that's what you're consider "fire" you need to educate yourself more.
This is a good place for it. But first you need to sit down firmly in the chair and stop idolizing fools on YouTube.
DCcan
Well-Known Member
People are so used to using their phone as their brain.
Any time they hear something new or disagree with, they do a Siri search, then stuff it in your face, instant experts droning on about what they found.
You remind me of my grown child, if it doesn't come up on page one, it's false. By extension of that flawed logic, she concludes she is correct.
Any time they hear something new or disagree with, they do a Siri search, then stuff it in your face, instant experts droning on about what they found.
You remind me of my grown child, if it doesn't come up on page one, it's false. By extension of that flawed logic, she concludes she is correct.