Recovering fraudulent or abused unemployment insurance?

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
The word convincing is the problem.

Compelling is more appropriate. Business owners are a miserly bunch and will only move to do the right thing if not doing so carries stiff penalties. The GOP has been entirely too solicitous to business owners, to the detriment of the rather larger population of their employees.
Semantics.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Secure stable housing and food does not require a direct payment to the person getting the resources does it?
No, but the word you used "baseline" implies that funds would be distributed to individuals, so that they could get the necessary resources. If that was not what you meant to imply, then I digress.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
No, but the word you used "baseline" implies that funds would be distributed to individuals, so that they could get the necessary resources. If that was not what you meant to imply, then I digress.
Its cool, I think you read into that a bit more than I intended it. I was more thinking having secure housing and food is really what it came down to. Outside of that is really just a question of how/where.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
No.
“Convincing” business owners implies a degree of power that they do not possess. It lies by implication.
"Compelling" them implies that you would force them into something which they may not want to be coerced into. The problem I see with that is the power of business lobbying. Again, I'm not opposed to the idea, and Gavernator Newsom could indeed compel them by way of a $20/hr state minimum wage, but I'm not sure he wants to face another recall election anytime soon.
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
I like ubi, adjusted for cost of living. Money is just the measure of how much you can buy, those dollars go much farther in some places.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
"Compelling" them implies that you would force them into something which they may not want to be coerced into. The problem I see with that is the power of business lobbying. Again, I'm not opposed to the idea, and Gavernator Newsom could indeed compel them by way of a $20/hr state minimum wage, but I'm not sure he wants to face another recall election anytime soon.
No motion without force. This works for politics as well as for Newton.

Of course they do not want to be coerced. Eats into profits which are the sole and true god.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
No motion without force. This works for politics as well as for Newton.

Of course they do not want to be coerced. Eats into profits which are the sole and true god.
Please, let's not degrade this any further by debating gravity or the laws of physics.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Personally I agree, however that paradigm drives politics each and every day, on both sides of the aisle unfortunately.
Considering some of the utter nonsense driving politics in the nation today, I am disinclined to argue.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Considering some of the utter nonsense driving politics in the nation today, I am disinclined to argue.
It seems like we have circled around to the beginning of this debate now, no?

I guess we're agreeing, however we aren't sure how to solve the problem, short of electing utopian leaders; however history shows that to lead towards Marxism.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
It seems like we have circled around to the beginning of this debate now, no?

I guess we're agreeing, however we aren't sure how to solve the problem, short of electing utopian leaders; however history shows that to lead towards Marxism.
Marxism is a spent force. The only ones saying Marxism are concealing autocratic wishes.

As for utopian, every single utopian movement I have encountered expects human nature to change in a mysterious but convenient manner.
 
Top