PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
I agree that the science is still young on this, and whatever the reason for the mutations, it's clear that they do happen. My comments weren't really related to your posts, I just wanted to capture your quote as a reference point. While it is likely that environment does play some role, I find it difficult to believe that it would be an overriding element. Consider two human twins in utero, they are both subjected to essentially the same environmental conditions, yet they have completely different dna mutations which result in identical twins who aren't really identical. Why should we expect that phenomenon to be much different in plants?Go up and read my first comment on the subject a few posts before this one(on the previous page I guess). I specifically mentioned mutations as being a possibility that would cause change.
I read that link you posted about this in a different thread a week or so ago. It says they don’t know why mutations sometimes happen. That isn’t some big new breakthrough. I’ve said for years that mutations from genetic damage can cause plants to change.
The other link shows that mutations can happen.......it mentions it could be environmental and then “hypothesizes” that it results in degradation of clones. I’ve seen it happen when plants got damaged over time from poor health and care. Mutations and degradation can happen like I’ve said from the beginning.
What neither of those links show is any proof that a healthy plant that is well cared for will naturally automatically degrade through cloning.