Smallbud
Well-Known Member
I don't want to call you a dick but as with peer studies did you happen to click on the author? Says again Dark Heart nurseries and they write this with submission to try and fool noobs. It has no real citation from any one I will endorse or the field of excellence and is simply another spoof paper.First study:
"The consistent detection of HLVd alone in all symptomatic plants from both locations and its occurrence in only a few asymptomatic plants point to an association of the disease with the stunted Cannabis. HLVd can persist in hops without symptoms, and Cannabis cultivators should take measures to minimize mechanical transmission while keeping in mind that HLVd may also be seed transmissible "
Source: https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/6716035
Second study:
"Only the plants that were inoculated with the infectious RNA constructs showed stunting, malformed and chlorotic leaf symptoms, and tested positive for the presence of HLVd by RT-PCR. These results confirm the occurrence of HLVd in Cannabis sativa. "
Source: https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/6716042
Odd the first study was posted as a means of denying the virus in marijuana because of its small sample size. That coupled with dozens of independent PhDs working in dozens of independent labs with no connection to dhn should be convincing even for anti-science individuals. You'd be grasping at straws if you're argument was that cannabis was not displaying symptoms of hplvd. However, your stance that it is not even being detected in hemp and marijuana is objectively false. Are you involved in the sale of clones?
You understand how easy it is to submit shit online but it gained no recognition so again I ask for a proper peer study not some cannabis crap from those who sell products!