Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Bitch for a month?what is the tax rate on a carton of Luckys?
Bitch for a month?what is the tax rate on a carton of Luckys?
agree. That's why i dont have them, or a veggie garden.i guess...just seems like a lot of work for 3 bucks worth of eggs...
We have a veggie garden (I look after my own devils lettuce garden) and she had one tomato and one bean lol. My garden had 8’ plants .agree. That's why i dont have them, or a veggie garden.
No, i prefer a walk along the beach or a bike ride. Vegetable gardens are to much work and like eggs don't cost very much to buy.i like having a veggie garden because it's kind of like therapy...when i get a little depressed or pissed, i go out and weed, water, do what needs doin, and by the end of it i usually feel good enough to be able to stand talking to people again, but i understand it doesn't work that way for a lot of people
gotta eat from all the food groups to stay healthy...meat is awesome, but it just won't keep you healthy by itselfMy complaint with gardens is that they are limited to growing “what food eats”. Vegetation, minus a tiny cohort of spices, is entirely “what food eats”. I’ll eat a steak, but not the salad it ate to become one.
that's true, but it has always seemed to me that the best approach is to go along with how nature and evolution designed us. we've been omnivorous nomadic wanderers for most of our existence, eating a wide variety of foods as we travel along, mostly motivated by the weather.Eating meat versus not is similar to the organic versus direct-element feed argument in our garden. You can feed your plants organic food, meat being the parallel here, but the plant will have to break that organic material down to access the things it actually needs. Or, you can feed the direct elements, fruits/veggies being the parallel here, and bypass the vast majority of the breakdown process. You can bypass the meat/dairy portion of the food groups and get them elsewhere and not miss out on anything. The main difference is just in nutrient density.
I disagree. Meat is more appropriate human nutrition than what meat eats. Ask the Inuit. Or the Pima. Once starch was added to their diet by an ignorant Uncle Sam, the Pima experienced new things: obesity, heart disease, diabetes. The current food pyramid is upside down, and I believe that the mega ag combines like Archer Daniels Midland were pulling a Facebook or Philip Morris. They knew that poison was money. Lotta politics in nutrition science.Eating meat versus not is similar to the organic versus direct-element feed argument in our garden. You can feed your plants organic food, meat being the parallel here, but the plant will have to break that organic material down to access the things it actually needs. Or, you can feed the direct elements, fruits/veggies being the parallel here, and bypass the vast majority of the breakdown process. You can bypass the meat/dairy portion of the food groups and get them elsewhere and not miss out on anything. The main difference is just in nutrient density.
I don't expect that, but the trend is telling. Let's not fight where nature and evolution are pushing is, which is a reduction of meat intake.that's true, but it has always seemed to me that the best approach is to go along with how nature and evolution designed us. we've been omnivorous nomadic wanderers for most of our existence, eating a wide variety of foods as we travel along, mostly motivated by the weather.
"modern" humans have been around for close to 200,000 years, and our ancestors were around for about 5 million years before that...we've become a stationary agricultural society only about 10,000 years ago. that's about 500 times as long...you can't expect evolutionary change that quickly
Is starch what meat eats naturally? We give cows skittles fer cryin' out loud. And the things your body processes by breaking down animal proteins, you can get that from what meat eats, or...what meat is supposed to eat anyway.I disagree. Meat is more appropriate human nutrition than what meat eats. Ask the Inuit. Or the Pima. Once starch was added to their diet by an ignorant Uncle Sam, the Pima experienced new things: obesity, heart disease, diabetes. The current food pyramid is upside down, and I believe that the mega ag combines like Archer Daniels Midland were pulling a Facebook or Philip Morris. They knew that poison was money. Lotta politics in nutrition science.
I have never seen a cow graze skittles.Is starch what meat eats naturally? We give cows skittles fer cryin' out loud. And the things your body processes by breaking down animal proteins, you can get that from what meat eats, or...what meat is supposed to eat anyway.
it's hard to get enough C, E, boron, calcium, potassium, lithium, polyphenols, myo-inositol, and fiber from an all meat diet. eating a lot of fish helps some, but not enough to avoid deficiencies...organ meats also help with some of these, but eating enough organ meat to make up what is missing can lead to vitamin a poisoning, and other problems.I disagree. Meat is more appropriate human nutrition than what meat eats. Ask the Inuit. Or the Pima. Once starch was added to their diet by an ignorant Uncle Sam, the Pima experienced new things: obesity, heart disease, diabetes. The current food pyramid is upside down, and I believe that the mega ag combines like Archer Daniels Midland were pulling a Facebook or Philip Morris. They knew that poison was money. Lotta politics in nutrition science.
i used to think similarly (went full paleo for almost a year) and then when I had a physical my cholesterol was high in all the wrong places. I explained my diet and the logic/data behind it and my doctor politely asked me what the average lifespan of a caveman was.I disagree. Meat is more appropriate human nutrition than what meat eats. Ask the Inuit. Or the Pima. Once starch was added to their diet by an ignorant Uncle Sam, the Pima experienced new things: obesity, heart disease, diabetes. The current food pyramid is upside down, and I believe that the mega ag combines like Archer Daniels Midland were pulling a Facebook or Philip Morris. They knew that poison was money. Lotta politics in nutrition science.
My cholesterol went down, and my blood lipid ratio improved a lot. But I had to be strict and keep daily carbs below two grams. When I crept it past ten, I started gaining weight.i used to think similarly (went full paleo for almost a year) and then when I had a physical my cholesterol was high in all the wrong places. I explained my diet and the logic/data behind it and my doctor politely asked me what the average lifespan of a caveman was.
Inuit are not really a logical example as over countless generations and natural selection their genetic adaptations are vastly different than many populations. They intake an extreme amount of saturated fats but have non existent cardiovascular issues. They still have a much shorter life expectancy than the average Canadian by over 10 years.
I’m still very mindful of diet but pay more attention to what oils and fats I intake. I really like the greek approach to food ratios.
If you could avoid anything that is truly “foreign to our digestive system” cut out processed sugars and eat more low glycemic fruit. One can of coke has the equivalent of 10-12 inches of sugar cane. It would have taken ancient man half a day to chew through that much sugar; but we can flood our bodies with it in seconds now.
My cholesterol went down, and my blood lipid ratio improved a lot. But I had to be strict and keep daily carbs below two grams. When I crept it past ten, I started gaining weight.
I do not eat fruit. Cannot stand the stuff.