Facebook & Social Media

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You have every right not to. I'm not here to convince anyone of anything. I just enjoy discussion. It opens horizons, censorship closes them.
You have every right to be a right wing troll until you get banned.

I'm just pointing out that Frances Haugan testified under oath and there is no reason to claim she committed perjury. This gives me a factual base upon which to call you a liar.
 

Hiddengems

Well-Known Member
You have every right to be a right wing troll until you get banned.

I'm just pointing out that Frances Haugan testified under oath and there is no reason to claim she committed perjury. This gives me a factual base upon which to call you a liar.
There you go. The answer is always a cry to authority to "shut him up".

I have the right to not believe her. Just like you have the right to not believe me. How does a situation that involves neither of us personally produce such a strong emotional reaction? It's just a discussion, nobody is being hurt.
 
Last edited:

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
That's my point. All big advances are cherry picked from the cesspool of the fringe. Most are horrible ideas, but all the gems come from the fringe.
That is bad fractured logic, like your earlier posts. Fringe is not interchangeable with “ahead of one’s time”. Galileo, Brunel, Edison, von Braun: massive innovators but not fringe.

Fringe has become synonymous with obviously fractured process, like Qanon and Falun Gong and MAGA. These are fringe. Trans rights are not fringe. Jewish space lasers are fringe.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
There you go. The answer is always a cry to authority to "shut him up".

I have the right to not believe her. Just like you have the right to not believe me. How does a situation that involves neither of us personally produce such a strong emotional reaction? It's just a discussion, nobody is being hurt.
Not at all. This forum is privately owned and if you keep promoting bullshit lies, you'll be banned. It's the lying that is objectionable, not actual speech.

It wasn't hitlers speech that killed. Is was the collectivist nation of followers that killed.

Hitlers was actually leftist.
lulz, Hitler ruined it for you racists and bigots didn't he? So you tried to distance your fascist political ideology from him by doing what he did so many times -- accuse his opponents of doing what he did.

Didn't take you long to tell us you are a Nazi.

Why did Hitler resort propaganda, lies and anti-Semitic myths so much?
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Not at all. This forum is privately owned and if you keep promoting bullshit lies, you'll be banned. It's the lying that is objectionable, not actual speech.


lulz, Hitler ruined it for you racists and bigots didn't he? So you tried to distance your fascist political ideology from him by doing what he did so many times -- accuse his opponents of doing what he did.

Didn't take you long to tell us you are a Nazi.

Why did Hitler resort propaganda, lies and anti-Semitic myths so much?
I wonder if this one is a Holocaust denier.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
That's my point. All big advances are cherry picked from the cesspool of the fringe. Most are horrible ideas, but all the gems come from the fringe.
Umm, no

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position.

@CatHedral used the term correctly. I know it's too much to ask but I will anyway. Stop lying to us. You see, the thing is, we saw you and your kind clearly on Jan 6. When you recite the lies of the fascist right, you appear to us as these guys:

1635460694605.png

Through any legal means necessary we will suppress you.
 

Hiddengems

Well-Known Member
No. He was hard right. Are you that agitated when you read the word “socialist”?
It was literally the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

If words trigger someone they're either not mature, or suffered some kind of trauma.

Any kind of government can foster an authoritarian ruler if that's what the people fall for. But as a rule most of them hide behind collectivism. That way the "good of the people" trumps morals.
 

Hiddengems

Well-Known Member
Umm, no

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position.

@CatHedral used the term correctly. I know it's too much to ask but I will anyway. Stop lying to us. You see, the thing is, we saw you and your kind clearly on Jan 6. When you recite the lies of the fascist right, you appear to us as these guys:

View attachment 5018422

Through any legal means necessary we will suppress you.
Name a major tech innovation or societal advance that wasn't once a fringe idea.
 

Hiddengems

Well-Known Member
Computers, fire, polyurethane condoms.
So these things have always been accepted as fact forever?

In the early 1920's a solid state computer based on the electrical properties of silicon would get you laughed out of the room. Everyone knew vacuum tubes worked fine.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
So these things have always been accepted as fact forever?

In the early 1920's a solid state computer based on the electrical properties of silicon would get you laughed out of the room. Everyone knew vacuum tubes worked fine.
Fire or computers were never considered fringe. They were technologies that radically changed humanity.

Polyurethane condoms are my go to so I tossed them in the mix because they make my life more enjoyable.
 

Hiddengems

Well-Known Member
Fire or computers were never considered fringe. They were technologies that radically changed humanity.

Polyurethane condoms are my go to so I tossed them in the mix because they make my life more enjoyable.
Do you believe that censoring all fringe intellectual activity would be a good thing?

Remember that just a few short years ago all of the cultural "advancement" we've made was fringe.

No ideology is right. Any worldview needs constant revision from outside itself to be as true as possible. If you're a believer in the current views of either party remember that they were both vastly different 20-30 years ago, and that ideas from their fringe made it to the party platforms.
 
Top