Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
I didn't make an argument in regards to voter ID and fraud. Maybe that was someone else. I understand if ID requirements provide null benefit in deterring fraud, enacting the laws requiring ID would be a fool's errand. What I don't understand is the apparent disingenuous nature of the argument on both sides. Why are we told the 'disadvantaged' cannot obtain an ID therefore this hinders voting? When I hear this it's generally argued from a place of implied racism. According to this research, voter ID laws do not affect these groups but also serve no practical purpose. A less divisive conclusion.The argument was made that voter ID's were necessary to stop voter fraud....and your study says it doesn't. So voter id's are not necessary for a fair election.
Last edited: