Anyone else watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial?

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I'm all for objectivity. I listed objective facts about Rittenhouse's actions the night he killed three people in my explanation of why I doubt he is innocent. You are making shit up and hiding behind the jury's verdict. Yes, the jury followed the judge's instructions and found Rittenhouse not guilty. So he will walk and not face justice. I hope he corrects his life.
he'll face justice one way or another and wouldn't be surprised if when the 15 minutes wears off; he puts a round in his head.


Georgie has a Scarlett Letter.
 

Applesauceisgood

Well-Known Member
And I have kicked some ass in those situations
sans a rifle cause I have balls
Good for you. Thankfully, we have no obligation to "man up" and risk death or bodily harm against people who wish to do us harm. What a silly argument - try telling a woman being physically assaulted by her partner that she should grow some balls and fight him on equal footing. Mr. Rittenhouse was 17 and had more common sense than you. How do you like them apples?
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
he'll face justice one way or another and wouldn't be surprised if when the 15 minutes wears off; he puts a round in his head.


Georgie has a Scarlett Letter.
never happen, turds like kyle have to be plunged down, they never go on their own
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
If i was going to a protest, I'd go armed. This is America, the only thing we like more than guns is shitting on minorities.
Damn man. You are echoing what happened in Germany in the 1920's. Fascist paramilitary killers wiped out those who opposed Nazis doing exactly what you say.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
Good for you. Thankfully, we have no obligation to "man up" and risk death or bodily harm against people who wish to do us harm. What a silly argument - try telling a woman being physically assaulted by her partner that she should grow some balls and fight him on equal footing. Mr. Rittenhouse was 17 and had more common sense than you. How do you like them apples?
Sissies with guns
At least that is an honest assessment and explains why so many of you "fear for your lives"
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
The history of his attackers does not matter. A pedophile who served his sentence has paid for crimes committed. The intent is obvious if you aren't arguing in bad faith. For example, adults recognize that charging at someone is nefarious intent which you have a right to protect against, depending on state law and the duty to retreat. In regards to the other attackers, the intent is obvious if you're being genuine. We agree being attacked by fists, feet, skateboards, and rocks is nefarious intent. Perhaps more so while in the act of retreat.
Yes, yes, the jury found Rittenhouse not guilty as charged just like the judge told them to. We all knew this was likely.
 

Applesauceisgood

Well-Known Member
Sissies with guns
At least that is an honest assessment and explains why so many of you "fear for your lives"
Let's face it, you would only be satisfied if Mr. Rittenhouse put down his gun and was torn to pieces by the mob because those criminals are your people. I was laughing hysterically during Mr. Kraus's rebuttal when he suggested everyone gets a beating in life and Mr. Rittenhouse was a coward for not fighting a 30-something-year-old man as a 17-year-old. I am sure that played well to the mothers on the jury.
 
Top