piney420
Well-Known Member
None of this makes any sense... but seems about right coming from a malfunctioning hive mind!No actual libertarian would reply with this. We got a traitriot in really bad sheep’s clothing; make offer
None of this makes any sense... but seems about right coming from a malfunctioning hive mind!No actual libertarian would reply with this. We got a traitriot in really bad sheep’s clothing; make offer
The state was attempting to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Rittenhouse did not have the right to self-defense in this case. In other words, the jury decided that Mr. Rittenhouse acted in self-defense, and his right was affirmed.fuzzy logic that.
The jury found Rittenhouse not guilty on all counts based upon instructions from the judge. @Applesauceisgood went way beyond that. Because you people have selective memory, I'll post what he said:
"The victim is Mr. Rittenhouse. He was violently attacked and his right to self-defense was reaffirmed under law. A just outcome."
Rittenhouse was found not guilty of all charges. That is fact. The "blah blah self defense affirmed" post by applejuice came from his cognitive bias and was not part of jury's opinion.
But did they bring guns thinking that they might use them? Next time they will. And that is not something the law in this case took into account. This has not made America more safe, it made it less safe. And that is not the purpose of the law.
Hive mind, lol, qtard dog whistle, great successNone of this makes any sense... but seems about right coming from a malfunctioning hive mind!
So I should just never leave my house? Like I got to go to the grocery store and stuff.Good for you! Making the choice to NOT be a willing target is the best defense in my opinion.
You mean like the CRIMINAL that had an ILLEGAL gun that ASSAULTED an underage person and got shot for it?Who had the guns at the times and places that matter? Does that help?
Feel free to leave comradeThat's fine, I have no use for boomers, lefties or righties!
Both... Kyle had a gun, third guy had a gun. Thats 2 sides having guns. The bigger issue is the third guy with the gun, he should have smoked kyle in the head after he killed the first 2.Who had the guns at the times and places that matter? Does that help?
He had a rifle to protect himself while helping people in an area abandoned by police.Zero bearing. He was not there to protect his home. Why was he there with a rifle? Counter protesting?
Huh? By carrying a gun you're not a willing target right? So you can go anywhere you want... i wasn't being sarcastic. All women should get a concealed permit and carry.So I should just never leave my house? Like I got to go to the grocery store and stuff.
Of course, because the state does not want an armed populace. Defending yourself is not personal responsibility, it's the job of the state.Biden said the verdict left him "angry and concerned". But what he really means is "grumpy and confused"
ooh nice caps. As if Shootenhouse knew any of the back story when he was busy pew pew pew.You mean like the CRIMINAL that had an ILLEGAL gun that ASSAULTED an underage person and got shot for it?
OoooBiden said the verdict left him "angry and concerned". But what he really means is "grumpy and confused"
Same to you! Hilarious you're on a site that is all about an individual freedom, like growing pot, but you're all against the freedom of having a gun. So typical...Feel free to leave comrade
They do seem to have 0.1% of the value of a tasty image meme.Oooo
Verbal memes
"slaughter works very well" good heavens.Thats where we must disagree. Slaughter works very well. And its not fantasy. This protest here was full of armed protesters. All I was saying is, if one side is going to show up armed, then the other side should as well. Otherwise, the unarmed side will be wiped out by the armed side. As American history keeps showing Might makes right. Has any of these peaceful protest changed anything? Or did change only seem to come after great violence?
Not in a qualified persons handSame to you! Hilarious you're on a site that is all about an individual freedom, like growing pot, but you're all against the freedom of having a gun. So typical...
So pot should only be in qualified hands too right? Everyone that wants to smoke should have to have a medical card? Or can you let people do what they wantNot in a qualified persons hand
Please show where I said that otherwise it is just another verbal memeSo pot should only be in qualified hands too right? Everyone that wants to smoke should have to have a medical card? Or can you let people do what they want