BurtMaklin
Well-Known Member
Gawd you're boring.Projection or confession?
Gawd you're boring.Projection or confession?
Who is 'far left'?I'm just talking the precedent it's setting for the ideologies that seem to be pervading both far left and right leaning Americans today. That kid is practically a Martyr at this point. The lawsuits are a different story.
Because you said so?The heart of the matter is that the far left doesn't believe in personal property, or the right to self defense. The latter would mean that the government was failing to protect its citizens.
Not at all. What I mean by "far left" is the people that use something like civil rights or movements such as BLM for a specific agenda or virtue signaling loosely related to the actual concept.Who is 'far left'?
Is it just because someone is against the people that say that they are far right make them 'far left'? Or is just as simple as people saying they are?
Can you give an example because I really am not sure what you mean.Not at all. What I mean by "far left" is the people that use something like civil rights or movements such as BLM for a specific agenda or virtue signaling loosely related to the actual concept.
The public defense system in the United States is a cornerstone of our democracy. It is meant to ensure that everyone accused of a crime gets a lawyer — even if they can't afford one. Under our Constitution, every person is innocent until proven guilty and deserves the chance to be properly defended in court.So was he found guilty or not? I dont watch the news. Just grow weed.
Innocent at birth and beyond
I thought that pedophiles were all in the Democratic party
What is your affiliation ?
Asking for Americans who believe in Democracy
As soon as you spew MSM you smear democracy, stay out of Americas elections
Fascism or Democracy
Is the choice being offered
A good example would be that Rosenbaum character. While I do not agree with how his life was ended, I'm going to make a guess that he was not there for the same reason as someone like yourself may be there. He was there to create chaos and more than likely had absolutely no skin in the game he was "fighting" for. I'm talking about the posers here, not the people and families that are actually affected by these matters and want a change.Can you give an example because I really am not sure what you mean.
Still no denialMore of the same.
Yawn!!
The crazy fucker from Texas?A good example would be that Rosenbaum character. While I do not agree with how his life was ended, I'm going to make a guess that he was not there for the same reason as someone like yourself may be there. He was there to create chaos and more than likely had absolutely no skin in the game he was "fighting" for. I'm talking about the posers here, not the people and families that are actually affected by these matters and want a change.
lol well tell them to stop sending their crazies our way!hey now, leave Tx's out of this.....
i'm trying, it's hard to keep track of 30 million people....sheeshlol well tell them to stop sending their crazies our way!
I didn't say he was political at all. He was there for a different agenda. That was just a pretty concrete example of what I'm talking about. There's a lot of convolution of ideas that don't even relate to each other. Posturing, for lack of a better word.The crazy fucker from Texas?
You think that he was political? I have not heard about this at all. I really would be surprised if he actually even voted. And if he did, I would be more surprised if he didn't vote Republican.
I would be curious why you think he was 'fighting for' this? Because from what I read he was there because he was homeless after being released from a mental ward.
It might be worth understanding that this might just be your feels (that might be bullshit far-right troll spam that you read/heard so often that it stuck), and not really anything close to reality.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/the-people-behind-the-violence-in-the-american-protests-of-george-floyd.1018871/post-15843193
LOL TRIGGERED again ...love itThe public defense system in the United States is a cornerstone of our democracy. It is meant to ensure that everyone accused of a crime gets a lawyer — even if they can't afford one. Under our Constitution, every person is innocent until proven guilty and deserves the chance to be properly defended in court.
It turns out he was found not guilty by a jury of his peers. How funny to see certain posters blabber on in other threads about our democracy when convenient but question and dismiss it as illegitimate when not
I wouldn’t consider myself far left by any means, but I do believe you don’t purposefully go to a place expecting danger and even the need for Bullet proof vests and then claim self-defense. The kid talked about shooting what he believed was shoplifters a few weeks before right? But I do agree, property is not worth a life, especially if it isn’t even your property. A young friend asked me what I would do if people were coming to burn my house down. I told him, pack the family and drive the other direction, it’s insured. But I do understand people like you and him, you grasp onto the things you understand like “it’s mine” “them bad” “kill kill kill.” I don’t consider that a political thing, more of an intelligence thing, although many would argue there are a lot more people on the right who are stupid.The heart of the matter is that the far left doesn't believe in personal property, or the right to self defense. The latter would mean that the government was failing to protect its citizens.
Not just America. Had 2 friends in Japan commit the same crime together. One had a politician father, he got probation, the other got 4 years.White cop convicted of raping and assaulting 2 women had his 15 year sentence commuted by a judge to 4 years, then ordered to serve them at home. These biased Judges are snatching democracy right out of our hands, just more proof that we never truly progressed beyond an apartheid state. There are clearly two different "justice" systems at work in the USA.
That is a poor definition of far left.The heart of the matter is that the far left doesn't believe in personal property, or the right to self defense. The latter would mean that the government was failing to protect its citizens.
ShhhThat is a poor definition of far left.