Horselover fat
Well-Known Member
Cool. Prior to this post I didn't even know you existed, so this is kind of sudden, but goodbye anyway.You know, this post is timely. You are just a waste of time. Goodbye.
Cool. Prior to this post I didn't even know you existed, so this is kind of sudden, but goodbye anyway.You know, this post is timely. You are just a waste of time. Goodbye.
Why is it that Trumptards talk about themselves so much? Trump does but he's your leader so, he can and his tards gobble it up. But he doesn't give a thought or a care for his followers. You are insignificant to him and us. So, are you just compensating?Cool. Prior to this post I didn't even know you existed, so this is kind of sudden, but goodbye anyway.
What on earth are you on about? Geographically I live in north eastern europe and on a political compass you would find me pretty far south west.Why is it that Trumptards talk about themselves so much? Trump does but he's your leader so, he can and his tards gobble it up. But he doesn't give a thought or a care for his followers. You are insignificant to him and us. So, are you just compensating?
What does the south signify on a political compass? I imagine west means to the left.What on earth are you on about? Geographically I live in north eastern europe and on a political compass you would find me pretty far south west.
"What on earth are you on about" sounds like a BritWhat does the south signify on a political compass? I imagine west means to the left.
Also curious about “northeastern Europe” since that could be Stockholm, but it also could be Vorkuta. In what language region are you?
You are right, I jumped to a conclusion.What on earth are you on about? Geographically I live in north eastern europe and on a political compass you would find me pretty far south west.
I'm a finn.What does the south signify on a political compass? I imagine west means to the left.
Also curious about “northeastern Europe” since that could be Stockholm, but it also could be Vorkuta. In what language region are you?
I figured that's what you meant. Unfortunately, the word "Libertarian" means different things depending on where you live. Europe has the more literal meaning -- liberty. The US conservative movement has turned it to mean a strange economic theory that doesn't have anything to do with freedom, just some strange "free markets solve all problems" kind of corporate bullshit.I'm a finn.
I’ll have to look up libertarian left. As Fogdog explained, the US version is essentially hard right with a sexy name.I'm a finn.
It definitely sounds like a tricky quadrant to navigate successfully. I consider myself "on the left", but understand how libertarians feel. The only reason I can't really get on board as calling myself a libertarian is that I believe in social programs and assistance.I’ll have to look up libertarian left. As Fogdog explained, the US version is essentially hard right with a sexy name.
Asked you a few questions which you ignored.Cool. Prior to this post I didn't even know you existed, so this is kind of sudden, but goodbye anyway.
PJ, a touch of sanity after a clown or two we have had to suffer.It definitely sounds like a tricky quadrant to navigate successfully. I consider myself "on the left", but understand how libertarians feel. The only reason I can't really get on board as calling myself a libertarian is that I believe in social programs and assistance.
Depends on which kind of Libertarian you are. I think you might fit the French version better than the cooked up and bastardized version Republicans invented.It definitely sounds like a tricky quadrant to navigate successfully. I consider myself "on the left", but understand how libertarians feel. The only reason I can't really get on board as calling myself a libertarian is that I believe in social programs and assistance.
Nope.@Rob Roy chose to suck right wing cock. But that is not my concern.
Nope.
Philosphically, I am a Voluntarist, sometimes spelled Voluntaryist. Also, cock sucking is not for me, but it's okay if you do, that's your business. Just don't suck any cock where the cock owner would rather you don't. That's all I ask, don't be rapey.
If an anarcho communist community wants to dwell on a piece of land and every person there is into whatever prevailing philosophy they decide on, that's none of my business. Not for me, but none of my business. It's basically communism / collectivism and is anti individual liberty regarding how decisions are made. The collective in that sense becomes the dictator, at the top of the hierarchy. The ruler. Anarchists don't have a default ruler though. Anarcho Communists are just Communists, adding the Anarcho term to Communism, is cute, but pointless and contradictory.
I am an individual and do not default to a collective. The one thing that I need to do (should do) in order to be left alone, is to leave others alone. That makes me peaceful and is the core of a Voluntaryist philosophy. When Communists communities, or any other type of collective or state subsume others in defiance of individual consent, they cease being peaceful. They also cease to be Anarchists, since a forcible hierarchy is not compatible with Anarchy.
I hope that clears up any misconceptions you have. I know you hate it when I point out your foolishness, but I'm afraid I'm still winning.
Please consider the means used as being an important part of the process. Sort of like the whole love making is about consent and rape is about removal of consent thing. One is peaceful the other is a vicious crime.It definitely sounds like a tricky quadrant to navigate successfully. I consider myself "on the left", but understand how libertarians feel. The only reason I can't really get on board as calling myself a libertarian is that I believe in social programs and assistance.
You mean like the redistribution of land we stole from the Native Americans? Yes, theft! Now you wanna claim ownership of stolen property?Please consider the means used as being an important part of the process. Sort of like the whole love making is about consent and rape is about removal of consent thing. One is peaceful the other is a vicious crime.
Social programs and assistance are great when administered voluntarily. Forcible redistribution of property that isn't yours is theft. Even when people who claim to be more equal than you do it.
In some places, people are forcibly prevented from doing charitable acts. Meaning government thugs threaten to attack when they fear being replaced. Careful which side of "charity" you gravitate to.
Dumb.On the other hand, a forcible collective, doesn't respect how other people might want to live. People who don't respect how others want to live are the selfish ones.