Hum don't think i talked about that, it might be my bad english sorry.
I don't think the issue is the number of dead people. this guy says i'm a killer because i could transmit it to weak people, we could make the exact same logic with flu, and he's wrong, no matter how much people could be impacted by my decision the logic is the same.
And he's 100% wrong, as i said it's up to the fragile people to be protected, and not the entire population that must treat themselve in order to prevent other people to be sick. Medecine does not work like that, you take a medecine to heal not to prevent other people to be sick.
We have examples of countries hit by omicron with a low vaccinated population, South Africa to name one, and there was not a huge increase of hospitalizations and deaths, your logic is based on suppositions. The truth is that we really don't know how much massive vaccination impacted the pandemic.
Sorry but your logic is biased ; vaccine don't prevent transmission, only severe forms of the disease. Vaccinated people still can transmit and spread the disease, and it's the major point why restrictive law against unvaccinated people are unefficient and even counter-productive. Vaccinated people, with this bias in mind, don't care anymore about social distancing and spread the disease a lot more than an unvaccinated forced to stay home.
About loss of medical help for unvaccinated, i don't agree also. If we follow your logics then smokers, obese, alcoholics, roadhogs, etc etc definitely shouldn't get heatlhcare too.
I said this to point that it was not a miracle bullet as you agreed. Old people in bad health should definitely protect themselves with vaccine, younger healthy people don't need to.