I think it more likely that you're simply a chew-toy and don't realize it
I think it more likely that you're simply a chew-toy and don't realize it
Linguistics are regional- you wouldn't believe the difference between Skin City of SoFla and The Stoic Methodist of NoCo.Are you taking your meds? You seem crazier than usual lately.
We feed em till they implodeI own your ass smart guy. Sir kaksalot too. Not to mention homer. All of you jokers are too stupid to quit feeding the troll.
Mad. But not vlad mad, right?
You attacked someone who was adding value to the discussion (the third such person you’ve attacked this week) and I responded to your post with a “Wow” emoji. If you consider that trolling, you may be too sensitive for the internet.He's my personal troll- even trolls have trolls.
Linguistics are regional- you wouldn't believe the difference between Skin City of SoFla and The Stoic Methodist of NoCo.
I would imagine its the same between US and Canada.
There are plenty who understand me because they take a moment to get it.
After I read your comment I looked up her record, because I don't know much about her tbh. She graduated from Harvard, with honors. She was an editor for Harvard Law Review. Not sure what that is, but it sounds impressive. She actually served under justice Breyer and two other Justices. Several Republicans and Democrats have said she's qualified. I read that some of the nominations in the past haven't even finished law school. I've read that there are many nominees who haven't seen a case. Considering that in the past we've nominated a KKK member, insurrection sympathizer, alleged rapist and Amy it just seems like it's gotta be because she's black. I'm sure the fact that she has a vagina doesn't help the cause.It isn't about race at all. Even if he had said he would appoint a woman in advance I would have a hyuge problem with it. But it's really about qualifications. Appointing a person who has only been a judge for three years and had never seen a case through to a verdict it would be unforgivable.
Right?
You attacked someone who was adding value to the discussion (the third such person you’ve attacked this week) and I responded to your post with a “Wow” emoji. If you consider that trolling, you may be too sensitive for the internet.
Bye the way, this post of yours is a good example of a troll post.
Angry meme..WOW!
Oh shit. My mistake. I may have accidentally described the last SCOTUS appointee, Amy Coney Barrett.After I read your comment I looked up her record, because I don't know much about her tbh. She graduated from Harvard, with honors. She was an editor for Harvard Law Review. Not sure what that is, but it sounds impressive. She actually served under justice Breyer and two other Justices. Several Republicans and Democrats have said she's qualified. I read that some of the nominations in the past haven't even finished law school. I've read that there are many nominees who haven't seen a case. Considering that in the past we've nominated a KKK member, insurrection sympathizer, alleged rapist and Amy it just seems like it's gotta be because she's black. I'm sure the fact that she has a vagina doesn't help the cause.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, maybe you're actually are worried she's not qualified. Here's a couple of links and there's a lot of great information about her out there. I think she'll do great so don't worry.
Here's an interesting Newsweek article about her:
Ketanji Brown Jackson's Historic Nomination Honors Brilliant Black Women
We should rejoice that the eminently qualified Judge Jackson will be the first Black woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court. She won't be the last.www.newsweek.com
This is her resume in case you want to do some research on her record:
Ketanji Brown Jackson to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court | The White House
On April 7, 2022, a bipartisan group of Senators confirmed Judge Jackson's nomination to become the 116th Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court.www.whitehouse.gov
Won't.FIFY
Amy = Speaks in TonguesAfter I read your comment I looked up her record, because I don't know much about her tbh. She graduated from Harvard, with honors. She was an editor for Harvard Law Review. Not sure what that is, but it sounds impressive. She actually served under justice Breyer and two other Justices. Several Republicans and Democrats have said she's qualified. I read that some of the nominations in the past haven't even finished law school. I've read that there are many nominees who haven't seen a case. Considering that in the past we've nominated a KKK member, insurrection sympathizer, alleged rapist and Amy it just seems like it's gotta be because she's black. I'm sure the fact that she has a vagina doesn't help the cause.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, maybe you're actually are worried she's not qualified. Here's a couple of links and there's a lot of great information about her out there. I think she'll do great so don't worry.
Here's an interesting Newsweek article about her:
Ketanji Brown Jackson's Historic Nomination Honors Brilliant Black Women
We should rejoice that the eminently qualified Judge Jackson will be the first Black woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court. She won't be the last.www.newsweek.com
This is her resume in case you want to do some research on her record:
Ketanji Brown Jackson to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court | The White House
On April 7, 2022, a bipartisan group of Senators confirmed Judge Jackson's nomination to become the 116th Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court.www.whitehouse.gov
Baal CovfefeAmy = Speaks in Tongues
A spirit thousands of years old from another planet guides her.
My father was a Pentecostal minister who spoke in tonguesAmy = Speaks in Tongues
Robert McCammon says hello!Baal Covfefe
What did he say?My father was a Pentecostal minister who spoke in tongues
MmmgmmfmnmgWhat did he say?
Needs more "L"sMmmgmmfmnmg
Hard with tongues in one’s mouth.Needs more "L"s