No. They'll probably grow like monster crop plants since the reveg. Way more bushy than normal. That's just based on what I'm hearing. Pics would help too.
im still dubious that they flowered in the first place, thats why i said what i said
I would put them on 24/24 and then 18/6. They're going to turn back to veg faster if you do so. Cheers!
These plants are clones of other mothers. So in total they are probably 4+ months old, so they started flowering pretty quickly. The clones in my SOG currently flowering showed actual flowers starting in around a week.
canna-base.com
This isn't stressful to the plants?How to Use the Gas Lantern Routine (GLR)
An Alternate Light Cycle Known as GLR GLR refers to a light schedule known as Gas Lantern Routine. The mythology around this system supposedly dates back to farmers whose crops were being raided by nocturnal pests and they would go out at night with gas lanterns to chase them away. What they...
the light during the night will simply cause a conformal change of phytochromes and this will prevent flowering in this case as Cannabis is a short-day-plant (mostly), but it's well tested among many plant species
Every time I see one of your posts with explanations, you usually have a solid refence that you include, its like your a walking horticulture encyclopedia!
You gotta DM me, I'm looking for some sources of information on a topic and I think you might have a back catalogue of answers.Thank you! Awesome info.
I DO have a well-logically sorted archive of studies, books & charts/excerpts on grow/plant-related topics:Every time I see one of your posts with explanations, you usually have a solid refence that you include, its like your a walking horticulture encyclopedia!
I DO have a well-logically sorted archive of studies, books & charts/excerpts on grow/plant-related topics:
View attachment 5113380
I estimate about half of that is Cannabis/hemp-specific.
It's a work in progress, I add about 10 studies daily. Still some sections are unfinished, esp. the charts. The way most studies are designed it's actually the compiled (comparative) data is displayed in graphs or diagrams so these are most easy to grasp the facts at hand.
I extract these out of the studies or books and archive them as well logically.
At some point I may start building a cross-referencing index, and maybe join several studies together to undermine specific topics with a broad range of arguments, preferred subjects would be Far-Red/ EmersonEffect; Green colour on photosynthesis, effects of UVA/B and cannabis physiology/nutrition/diagnostics
I used to but stopped some time ago due to legal trouble
You like to shoot in the dark huh? I don't know if that's actually helping anyone or good idea for supporting the community? It only goes to show practice will always be superior to theory and guess work.
You my friend are invaluable to this forum and should be cherished. You interested in publishing a study together?I DO have a well-logically sorted archive of studies, books & charts/excerpts on grow/plant-related topics:
View attachment 5113380
I estimate about half of that is Cannabis/hemp-specific.
It's a work in progress, I add about 10 studies daily. Still some sections are unfinished, esp. the charts. The way most studies are designed it's actually the compiled (comparative) data is displayed in graphs or diagrams so these are most easy to grasp the facts at hand.
I extract these out of the studies or books and archive them as well logically.
At some point I may start building a cross-referencing index, and maybe join several studies together to undermine specific topics with a broad range of arguments, preferred subjects would be Far-Red/ EmersonEffect; Green colour on photosynthesis, effects of UVA/B and cannabis physiology/nutrition/diagnostics
Hmmm what do you want to investigate?
