Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
So guns are banned at the Trump appearance at the NRA meeting in Houston. This defies logic. If they all had guns, including Trump, then there shouldn't be any place safer.
So you are worried about being invaded by Russia?You positive?
View attachment 5139390
You’ve aged me lol. I was doing that in the 80’s . It also encouraged lack of sleep . It’s a wonder why school shootings weren’t prolific back then !You never had to enter data into a 70s mainframe. One bad keystroke = dead program. Stuff like that encouraged literacy.
You seem to be confusing the armed forces' available weapons with a frightening proliferation of personal weapons in the hands of unvetted, untrained, potentially unstable individuals.Nope not until American is disarmed
To do it legally you would have to sit in a class for 3-5 days then written and practical testing. And that’s only for long guns, handgun licensing is even more strenuous. That in it self is a huge deterrent to gun crimes IMO. And a great place to start but again there is no easy start in the US that I can see at the moment.What we’re talking about is regulation. I don’t own a gun up here in Canada but I can get one if I want one.
I just can’t get one tonight and I have no problem with that.
But isn’t that the fear? All I hear is “they want our guns” from the gun zealots .Not sure i dont oppose registration or background checks. I get em all the time. I was being jest full about Russia. Russia is shit
Nobody is calling for "American" to be disarmed
You seem confused.
Btw not a rebublican or democrat
I do believe in a "well regulated militia" which (regardless of whatever the fuck those words meant in those days) has been well established as more than just a bunch of good Ole boys LARPing on the weekends.Not sure i dont oppose registration or background checks. I get em all the time. I was being jest full about Russia. Russia is shit
Nobody is calling for "American" to be disarmed
You seem confused.
Btw not a rebublican or democrat
What does, in your opinion, a well regulated militia mean in today’s world? I think that is part of the issue today, no one can agree what that actually means. Canadian kids can get a licence at 15, again with training and testing, not sure if age is an issue.I do believe in a "well regulated militia" which (regardless of whatever the fuck those words meant in those days) has been well established as more than just a bunch of good Ole boys LARPing on the weekends.
But this particular fuckstick bought two assault weapons days after his 18th birthday (earlier this month) with the full intent of killing people.
The SCOTUS decided this several times.What does, in your opinion, a well regulated militia mean in today’s world? I think that is part of the issue today, no one can agree what that actually means. Canadian kids can get a licence at 15, again with training and testing, not sure if age is an issue.
Yes I’m sure it is but you stated you believe in it and was curious what that belief entailed. The SCOTUS as it stands is a joke.The SCOTUS decided this several times.
My definition is irrelevant.
That how it is in my state. You can hunt at 12 with shared gun and baglimit.You can get a F.I.D card at fifteen with parental consent. This only allows a minor 15-17 to carry his own low cap. Long gun while hunting and share a bag limit with a licensed adult 18 +.they then can purchase non large capacity long guns at 18. To get an LTC for handguns and large cap long guns and concealed only carry,you need to pass training and be 21+What does, in your opinion, a well regulated militia mean in today’s world? I think that is part of the issue today, no one can agree what that actually means. Canadian kids can get a licence at 15, again with training and testing, not sure if age is an issue.