Biometrics for kids to attend school

bam0813

Well-Known Member
For the distance these are usually done and the short service life of the weapon used, it wouldn’t matter if it was a 500 dollar or 5 k rifle. The value, quality, brand seem irrelevant to me. If we were planning to go to battle it’s different but not for these
 

ProPheT 216

Well-Known Member
For the distance these are usually done and the short service life of the weapon used, it wouldn’t matter if it was a 500 dollar or 5 k rifle. The value, quality, brand seem irrelevant to me. If we were planning to go to battle it’s different but not for these
It's relevant because he had no money, so why wouldn't he buy cheap? Looks like someone gave him money
 

bam0813

Well-Known Member
Possibly, is this confirmed he had no money? Well then id have to agree someone gave him it. We need the reason. It could quite possibly be under a lie by the purp. Who hasn’t asked mom pops whoever for loot for something dif than they were saying.
 
Last edited:

ProPheT 216

Well-Known Member
Its been like that for over thirty years. Card companies charge the vendor per transaction. Using cash saves them and me money.
I thought that 2. Merchant fee can b like maybe 2% a swipe. I just did all kinds of math. Your absolutely right. Long story short my math shows they cut their loses from swipe fees in half by offering a 5 cent discount
 

ProPheT 216

Well-Known Member
Possibly, is this confirmed he had no money? Well then id have to agree someone gave him it. We need the reason. It could quite possibly be under a lie by the purp. Who hasn’t asked mom pops whoever for loot for something dif than you were saying.
Agree, but they were just purchased. Not like he lied about wanting a pc last year and bought a rifle and no one noticed. Spending 4 x as much on a gun as you need to when your broke just raises my eyebrows. Esp when it's immediately used like that. Seems like money was no issue at all I guess is what I'm saying
 

bam0813

Well-Known Member
Fishy but ill wait to see . I guess its not like you would lie for a loan for something you weren’t hiding so probably had to right away or his gig was up by loaner? Not sure we’ll see…….maybe
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
So I have been hearing crazy suggestions on tv and radio that we should use the most up to date technology to let kids into the school and know who is in a school. 1 if you look into the facts that brought this about, everything down to how the door was left open is a lie. That aside, do people not not relize your bank cant even not be breached every 3 or 4 years and have to change your card numbers. Your online info is breached and hacked all the time. Digital info is not safe. If your biometrics are hacked, face recognition, finger prints whatever that shit can never be reset. Do you want ypur kids faces out there? All of their individual identifying features that makes them unique to be stole, copied, manipulated? Used against them later? Not giving them any right to keep that stuff private if they so choose as an adult.

It's so proven that bots exist, participate in conversation on platforms and stir the pot. Let's give big tech more faces to steal, and make bots even hards to recognize.
my card is breached and must be replaced every 6 months. when i lived in south florida it was about every 3 months. funny you posted this, i literally just replaced it due to phishing through EM and text..i disagree with the digital interpretation..there are many safes to re-establish who you are; you just have to set them up.

what school? what door open? what are you talking about?
 

ProPheT 216

Well-Known Member
my card is breached and must be replaced every 6 months. when i lived in south florida it was about every 3 months. funny you posted this, i literally just replaced it due to phishing through EM and text..i disagree with the digital interpretation..there are many safes to re-establish who you are; you just have to set them up.

what school? what door open? what are you talking about?
No, I'm talking about taking them back. Once your face has been lost to data breach you can reset a new picture sure, but you can't stop the fact someone else has it now. Can attempt to be you, design an ai character that looks like you, anything is possible now.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Why do you think it's Republicans that are giving control to big tech? The last republican in office openly brought it to everyone's attention big tech and the news is lies and fake news. I'm not even a Trump suppoerter, I a realist. It scares me how much people want Trump, knowing government politics are corrupt as a whole.
lulz at the pictures.

Damn, man. We can't even get kids vaccinated during an epidemic in order to keep schools open. I don't believe the kiddy biometric conspiracy theory you posted. No way that's going to happen.

Not disagreeing the other point you made about any personal data shared online is at risk of being compromised. Most people seem complacent about it. Not I. I don't even carry a cell phone or have a FB account. Because Republicans oppose any regulations on corporations, we need to clean Republicans from power before we can make meaningful change on this issue. Some Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue as well, so they will have to be muzzled or removed too.
 

ProPheT 216

Well-Known Member
lulz at the pictures.

Damn, man. We can't even get kids vaccinated during an epidemic in order to keep schools open. I don't believe the kiddy biometric conspiracy theory you posted. No way that's going to happen.

Not disagreeing the other point you made about any personal data shared online is at risk of being compromised. Most people seem complacent about it. Not I. I don't even carry a cell phone or have a FB account. Because Republicans oppose any regulations on corporations, we need to clean Republicans from power before we can make meaningful change on this issue. Some Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue as well, so they will have to be muzzled or removed too.
What regulations do they oppose? Just curious of your pov.

Again I consider my seal a Realist. Opposing ludicrous ideas presented by any party. Things are not good right now, probably the worst in my life country wide. That's a fact. No fingers pointed
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
What regulations do they oppose? Just curious of your pov.

Again I consider my seal a Realist. Opposing ludicrous ideas presented by any party. Things are not good right now, probably the worst in my life country wide. That's a fact. No fingers pointed
You need to point fingers sometimes. Things being bad now is a delayed but direct result of that man’s disastrous domestic and foreign policies. His successor in the oval room is not at fault. A spurious “both sides” argument does him and his party a disservice.
 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
No, I'm talking about taking them back. Once your face has been lost to data breach you can reset a new picture sure, but you can't stop the fact someone else has it now. Can attempt to be you, design an ai character that looks like you, anything is possible now.
that is a good point; i wonder what they have in place to counteract. they must have. i'm going to check on that.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
lulz at the pictures.

Damn, man. We can't even get kids vaccinated during an epidemic in order to keep schools open. I don't believe the kiddy biometric conspiracy theory you posted. No way that's going to happen.

Not disagreeing the other point you made about any personal data shared online is at risk of being compromised. Most people seem complacent about it. Not I. I don't even carry a cell phone or have a FB account. Because Republicans oppose any regulations on corporations, we need to clean Republicans from power before we can make meaningful change on this issue. Some Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue as well, so they will have to be muzzled or removed too.
scary thought though.

you don't have a cell phone?
 
Last edited:

Weedoguido

Well-Known Member
You expect taxpayers to pay for this? Easier to just register all automatic weapons and pistols for a $100 fee or a $100 reward for turning it in. Limit mag sized to 5 rounds, license and train gun owners, they pay for the expense. Solutions have been found in all other peer liberal democracies and they work, no question about it, just reduce the number of guns and make it more expensive to legally own one. If they don't legally own a gun the fines are in the thousands, get caught with one in public and it's a mandatory minimum, no matter how white they are.

Works everywhere else just fine and many people would turn in their gun, the more expense and bother ownership is the greater the number turned in.
Legal gun owners will never turn in there guns because there LEGAL and law abiding citizens. When you see a gun turn in program on TV news all you see is old busted guns sitting on the table so nothing actually get accomplished. Criminals will most likely NEVER turn in there illegal guns. As we get into more restrictive gun laws I want everyone to pay attention to how the black market gun scene increases dramatically, is that what the Democrats really want, more unregistered guns flowing around the country. Or is all this just to get a vote at election time?
 
Top