Best way to transition from 18/6 to 12/12

medidedicated

medidedicated

Well-Known Member
Bud man 43 said:
buds in my hand are from my first grow ever- quite frosty and delicious- good potency but yes they lacked density-
Plants shown are from my second- these are still curing however you are wrong- these are really dense hard nugs. Again only my second try so I am learning-
On my third grow now and I have worked out the nutrient deficiencies on this group-
I have a lot to learn- and I believe there is always room for improvement.
I have 35% medical in my cabinet and I am quite satisfied with the buds I have grown or I would be hitting up the medical. It has to be decent- 40 years experience tells me so-
Click to expand...
I would be happy as heck with those two harvests lol. The second grow looks great, looks bigger than what I am possibly getting. My first was outdoor and small buds, no sunlight for most the day.

Just complimenting as it looks like some are giving you a hard time lol. Better than me so far!
 
twentyeight.threefive

twentyeight.threefive

Well-Known Member
Star Dog said:
As I mentioned earlier you sussed him out quickly, he's the forum idiot.
Click to expand...
Says the guy who says he proved flushing works by measuring the EC of the sap of a single plant. :dunce:

Last Week or Two Flowering, Flush??

So how can I make sure I get older genetics? I don’t believe the white rhino seeds on the market these days are the real deal, Acapulco gold hasn’t been heard of in London for years. Any advice? By talking to seed companies and seed brokers. Anyone who wont answer or wont give a straight...
rollitup.org
 
bk78

bk78

Well-Known Member
Bud man 43 said:
Hi everyone- happy summer
Does anyone have any knowledge or experience to share on what the best way to transition from 18/6 to 12/12?
Goal is -quality #1- quantity #2
Should I leave the time the lights are currently coming on and shut off 6 hours earlier?
Have the lights come on 6 hr later?
Go midway and subtract 3 hours of light early and 3 hours later?
Completely switch the dark and light times and subtract 6?- I imagine this would cause the most shock to the plant.
Thanks for your help.
Click to expand...
Refer to post number 2 please

Tq
 
Brettman

Brettman

Well-Known Member
bobj1598 said:
there's a lot of drama on this website but tbh, that's why I like it here. people bickering and calling each other names but then everybody moves on again. reminds me of a bygone era where people could speak freely without 8/10ths of the populace getting asshurt about it
Click to expand...
Well.. not everybody but most of us at least.
 
twentyeight.threefive

twentyeight.threefive

Well-Known Member
Star Dog said:
I find for the most part It's pretty harmonious around here with the exception of plank harassing people pointlessly.
Click to expand...
Oh you’re just still mad you didn’t prove that flushing works. It’s ok, I still like you. Just google “scientific method” for your next attempt to rerun the experiment like you said you would. I’m anxious to see the results.
 
Kassiopeija

Kassiopeija

Well-Known Member
twentyeight.threefive said:
Oh you’re just still mad you didn’t prove that flushing works. It’s ok, I still like you. Just google “scientific method” for your next attempt to rerun the experiment like you said you would. I’m anxious to see the results.
Click to expand...
why do actually ask for it? full well knowing SD can't possibly fulfill your majestic demands (as "scientific method" implies scientists doing it in a lab plus peer review and a boatload of other regulations... - that RX tech fertilizer producer study isn't fully up to these standards as well, now is it?)
 
twentyeight.threefive

twentyeight.threefive

Well-Known Member
Kassiopeija said:
why do actually ask for it? full well knowing SD can't possibly fulfill your majestic demands (as "scientific method" implies scientists doing it in a lab plus peer review and a boatload of other regulations... - that RX tech fertilizer producer study isn't fully up to these standards as well, now is it?)
Click to expand...
Implies scientists doing it in a lab? Wut?
Peer review? Boatload of other regulations? Which?

Perhaps you should google “scientific method” also as you clearly aren’t aware of what it entails.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top