Hey guys new to Forum, I’m new to growing my plant has 5 leaves nothing more does anyone know if it’s a hybrid or Sativa my plant app says it’s sativa

[Rchambers86]

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

View attachment 5161336

99.9% of plants are a hybrid nowadays. Your’s is mostly Indica.

 

[Lenin1917]

Your plant id app says cannabis sativa, because all cannabis is cannabis sativa, even indicas and ruederalis are all the species “cannabis sativa”. And pretty much anything around today is a hybrid. Look’s healthy though, keep it up and good luck.

 

[StonedGardener]

View attachment 5161336

Welcome ya young stoner dude , about time you start growing ! Your plant is perfectly normal. For 50yrs I've seen anywhere between 3 and 11. Plant looks great Im sure you've done your homework. My best advice is don't overwater , don't overfeed( oh yea , keep that under-story trimmed up, all that shitty growth that doesn't see light , "doesn't bring anything to the party. Your on your way, you're at that point in the curve that's very exciting...a beautiful new world !

 

[PJ Diaz]

Your plant id app says cannabis sativa, because all cannabis is cannabis sativa, even indicas and ruederalis are all the species “cannabis sativa”. And pretty much anything around today is a hybrid. Look’s healthy though, keep it up and good luck.

(PDF) Cannabis Taxonomy: The "sativa" vs. "indica" debate

PDF | On Jan 30, 2018, Robert C. Clarke and Mark D. Merlin published Cannabis Taxonomy: The "sativa" vs. "indica" debate | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

 

[Budzbuddha]

Call it weed - plant doesn’t care.

 

[Rchambers86]

Thanks guys for all your help any tips at this point would be awesome

 

[Budzbuddha]

She’s in flower. Keep her happy and fed .
Looks pretty good so far.

 

[Lenin1917]

(PDF) Cannabis Taxonomy: The "sativa" vs. "indica" debate

PDF | On Jan 30, 2018, Robert C. Clarke and Mark D. Merlin published Cannabis Taxonomy: The "sativa" vs. "indica" debate | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

Interesting read, didn’t know the naming convention changed. Always appreciate new data though

 

[Rchambers86]

Interesting read, didn’t know the naming convention changed. Always appreciate new data though

Thanks alot

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

Interesting read, didn’t know the naming convention changed. Always appreciate new data though

The naming convention didn't change, you were just wrong and posted wrong information.

 

[calvin.m16]

It's a Hybrid.

 

[Lenin1917]

The naming convention didn't change, you were just wrong and posted wrong information.

Fair enough

 

[PJ Diaz]

The naming convention didn't change, you were just wrong and posted wrong information.

Actually if you read the article, Robert C Clarke basically says that we've been wrong all along, and that the drug varieties should be called Cannabis Indica, and that there are two subspecies: ssp. Indica (Narrow leaf varieties, which we all call Sativa), and ssp. Afghanica (broad leaf varieties, which we typically call Indica). @Lenin1917 is correct that it was all originally called Cannabis Sativa, as mentioned in the article.

 

[PadawanWarrior]

Actually if you read the article, Robert C Clarke basically says that we've been wrong all along, and that the drug varieties should be called Cannabis Indica, and that there are two subspecies: ssp. Indica (Narrow leaf varieties, which we all call Sativa), and ssp. Afghanica (broad leaf varieties, which we typically call Indica). @Lenin1917 is correct that it was all originally called Cannabis Sativa, as mentioned in the article.

Even Dre and those guys know that!

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

Actually if you read the article, Robert C Clarke basically says that we've been wrong all along, and that the drug varieties should be called Cannabis Indica, and that there are two subspecies: ssp. Indica (Narrow leaf varieties, which we all call Sativa), and ssp. Afghanica (broad leaf varieties, which we typically call Indica). @Lenin1917 is correct that it was all originally called Cannabis Sativa, as mentioned in the article.

TLDR

 

[Lenin1917]

Nomenclature is not super important at operation level anyways, I’m growing good weed no matter what we call it I fuckin love weed so much

 

[HydroKid239]

TLDR

We can tell..

This is 7 lines down:

Swed-ish botanist Carl Linnaeus, the “father of modern taxonomy,” first published the scientific name Cannabis sativa in his seminal
Species Plantarum of 1753.

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

We can tell..

This is 7 lines down:

Swed-ish botanist Carl Linnaeus, the “father of modern taxonomy,” first published the scientific name Cannabis sativa in his seminal
Species Plantarum of 1753.

And cannabis indica was named less than 30 years later. Thanks for recapping the first 7 lines for me though.

 

[HydroKid239]

And cannabis indica was named less than 30 years later. Thanks for recapping the first 7 lines for me though.

The 1st part of your comment doesn't even matter. 2nd part.. didn't even happen. I didn't recap anything. I read to the 7th line.. which was past your ability at the time... but you call ppl out for posting wrong info, meanwhile it's you assuming again. AGAIN ffs Reading is fundamental.