hey numb nut, P Bush is still on the Ballot in Texas, he's in a runoff against PaxtonThe Bushes are done. All that remains is Mitch McConnell and a few other Republican globalist in Congress.
Some J Bush somebody didn't even make it on a ballot in Texas recently.
Oh did I now, I misunderstood?No you misunderstood, it applies to the idiots who do it while wearing their bumble bee outfits like the little bitches they are, while they try to intimidate parents at their kids schools.
So they're idiots if they're sucking cock, just like you said twice now right?lmao you mean cock suckers like these idiots?
LOL almost equivalent, you got me.hey numb nut, P Bush is still on the Ballot in Texas, he's in a runoff against Paxton
“Feel free to backtrack “LOL almost equivalent, you got me.
They should have some kind of scale... I'm tired of the thought of some ugly fat middle-aged guy on a mobility scooter thinking his life is worth killing someone over. You need to be at least a good solid 6 or 7 to own a gun!civil war? fat, old, stupid assholes who smoke, drink beer daily, and have to have their diesel pickup's seat shoved all the way back for their pendulous guts to fit behind them...are going to declare war and attack....what exactly?
get the fuck real, they have no one to wage war with...a few militia groups that would be wiped out to a man the first time they fired at a national guard unit. just more ridiculous horseshit. they already tried civil war, they barely had enough people to disrupt the capital building for half a day, and now most of those people are in jail or under indictment.
back on track, the simple fact that you equate that image of direct physical intimidation (do what we want and nobody gets hurt!) with peaceful protestOh did I now, I misunderstood?
So they're idiots if they're sucking cock, just like you said twice now right?
Or does "do it" refer to other than sucking cock like bitches? It's a rhetorical question, but feel free to backtrack.
"We do that all the time, get over it."Mulvaney says he never saw ‘intentional destruction of documents’ at Trump White House
Former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on Thursday said that he saw former President Trump rip up documents but never saw the intentional destruction of important papers.
The remarks from Mulvaney, who has been critical of Trump, come days after the FBI conducted a search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate that is linked to a probe on classified documents.
“I never saw the intentional destruction of documents for the purpose of keeping anything for the National Archives, or the public in the future,” Mulvaney told CNN’s “New Day” host Brianna Keilar
Mulvaney said that everyone in the administration knew the importance of preserving documents and that everyone including himself sometimes ripped up documents.
“And we knew the rules and yes, we taped them back together and yes, we made copies and keep in mind that’s important,” Mulvaney told Keilar.
“As long as copies are preserved, you can pretty much do whatever you want to with the other documents,” he added. “But we all knew the rules and I never saw the intentional destruction of documents whatsoever.”
Mulvaney reiterated that he saw documents being “handled in the ordinary course of business,” stating that every prior administration has fixed defaced documents.
“You never heard about him ripping and flushing documents,” Keilar asked Mulvaney.
“I saw him rip documents. I mean we did,” Mulvaney replied back.
“The flushing, you never heard about him flushing documents,” Keilar asked Mulvaney.
New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman earlier this week released a pair of photos from her forthcoming book to back up her reporting that White House staffers regularly found ripped-up printing paper in the toilet of the presidential residence during Trump’s term in office.
“Not a single time,” Mulvaney said.
Mulvaney’s remarks come after the FBI executed a search warrant at Trump’s Florida based residence on Monday. The raid was reportedly as part of an investigation into whether Trump brought classified documents with him when he left the White House.
Mulvaney says he never saw ‘intentional destruction of documents’ at Trump White House
Former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on Thursday said that he saw former President Trump rip up documents but never saw the intentional destruction of important papers. The remarks from …thehill.com
I doubt he never saw even one “scotch tape rescue”."We do that all the time, get over it."
Failing is a matter of perspective. Example: If you are at the very top and want it all for yourself and a few to serve you, then the divide, conquer, destroy strategy is not a fail. See, perspective!Politics is just sort of one aspect of a general failing in society.
It is a pernicious and entirely amoral perspective. For some reason you omitted that detail.Failing is a matter of perspective. Example: If you are at the very top and want it all for yourself and a few to serve you, then the divide, conquer, destroy strategy is not a fail. See, perspective!
the policy being it's a crime to remove docs that belong to the people, not a traitor, from the WH.
he was around earlier today …anybody know what happened to jim damick?
And which Qnon lackey told you that ? …. The guy with the Trump Rambo shirt ?If that's all it is they just handed him the white house.
Obama still has 3 million documents from his administration he promised to digitize and return. 0 have been returned.
Well, I was thinking of society as a whole, and I do see it as failing, but I get what you mean.Failing is a matter of perspective. Example: If you are at the very top and want it all for yourself and a few to serve you, then the divide, conquer, destroy strategy is not a fail. See, perspective!