Examples of GOP Leadership

Budzbuddha

Well-Known Member
Fiscal irresponsibility...the hallmark of Republicans.

National Republican Senatorial Committee funds declined to just $28.4 million by the end of June.

A number of Republican strategists and consultants are growing increasingly dismayed about millions of dollars vanishing at the National Republican Senatorial Committee — just when the funds are needed most, The Washington Post reported Friday.

Cash at the national campaign fund is dwindling as candidates head into the final stretch of Senate races across the U.S.

“If they were a corporation, the CEO would be fired,” a national Republican consultant working on Senate races told the newspaper, referring to the committee.


“There needs to be an audit or investigation because we’re not gonna take the Senate now and this money has been squandered,” added the consultant, who spoke to the outlet on condition of anonymity. “It’s a rip-off.”

Florida Sen. Rick Scott, who chairs the NRSC, has been attacked by Republicans for featuring himself in ads and releasing a policy agenda that caused trouble for the GOP, leading to quips that “NRSC” stands for “National Rick Scott Committee.”

NRSC funds had reportedly reached $173 million this election cycle but were already down to $28.4 million by the end of June.

The committee spent more than $12 million on American Express credit cardpayments with an unclear purpose, along with $13 million for consultants and $9 million on debt payments, the Post said.

Now, a number of Republican candidates are struggling to raise money ahead of the general elections in November.

“It’s surprising and says a lot about the Republican brand that their candidates have struggled to raise money,” J.B. Poersch, the president of the Democratic-allied Senate Majority PAC, told the Post.

“With extreme candidates and extreme positions, maybe Republican donors are finding these candidates are out of step with where they are,” he said. “Maybe voters are feeling the same way.”

88DD8646-915B-493E-8C9F-44340CBD00A5.gif
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Conflating ignorance and malevolence as you are certainly is not progress.
again, believe what you will.

You remain ignorant of the actual offense you brought, which has nought to do with piffles such as male-pattern baldness.

I estimate the chances that you will muster the necessary humility to ask as low.
It is like the classic monkey trap, restraining you by your own choice. I like elegantly spare solutions such as this one you so obligingly provided.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Now Just keep repeating that in the mirror.....
i don't quite understand the desire to be something other than what you are, but i don't have a problem with people doing what they need to do to make themselves happy...unless what they need to do to make themselves happy is make everyone around them that doesn't believe what they believe miserable.
if a guy feels more comfortable living his life as a woman, what's that to me or to you? how is it hurting either one of us?
if he wants to go to the ladies room, is that going to set off a bunch of assholes who think that everyone who isn't the same as them are child molseters? when 90% of child molesters are repressed white male republicans? seems like a little projection to me.
leave people that are leaving you alone the fuck alone...how they live their lives isn't up to us, it's up to them, deal with that.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
again, believe what you will.

You remain ignorant of the actual offense you brought, which has nought to do with piffles such as male-pattern baldness.

I estimate the chances that you will muster the necessary humility to ask as low.
It is like the classic monkey trap, restraining you by your own choice. I like elegantly spare solutions such as this one you so obligingly provided.
I conceded the ignorance of it, did you not interpret that? There was no question mark involved but it is the same. At this point you are attempting to have me beg for something you promised and I will not, I am content with al fine' at the lie you told in the other thread that led here.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I conceded the ignorance of it, did you not interpret that? There was no question mark involved but it is the same. At this point you are attempting to have me beg for something you promised and I will not, I am content with al fine' at the lie you told in the other thread that led here.
No. You never stated it. You need to speak plainly. And no; “beg” is your distortion that makes your overcoming the state of prisoner of your pride-driven choice even less probable.
 
Last edited:

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
just don't interfere with what a woman and her highly educated Professional Doctor decide is best for her and not some elected politician.
If I'm paying for it, I will interfere at my leisure. I love this new double standard. You're all up in my gun safe but you're not buying my bullets my dude. Funny how that always works only toward your pet issues.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
If I'm paying for it, I will interfere at my leisure. I love this new double standard. You're all up in my gun safe but you're not buying my bullets my dude. Funny how that always works only toward your pet issues.
You ain't paying for sh*t. These are womens rights. The removal of basic personal rights between a woman and her dr is not sitting well with the majority of women, they may have poked a sleeping dragon.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
No. You never stated it. You need to speak plainly. And no; “beg” is your distortion that makes your remaining a prisoner of your pride-driven choice even less probable.
But I did, in plain text. And it's a compliment to you that it need not be spoken plainly. I'm in no trap, I am no prisoner. All I need to do is leave you with the answer you asked for with no response by you to it and the lie you told to get it. I'm totally fine with that, really.
 
Top