PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
It doesn't seems like you are actually asking any questions at all.
It doesn't seems like you are actually asking any questions at all.
Feel free to keep bumping the thread.It doesn't seems like you are actually asking any questions at all.
Yeah! This is what you guys are all about !!My associated search turned this up. “The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude greater than that needed to produce it.”
Brandolini's law - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
totally agree that it's easier to shit than communicate.Yeah! This is what you guys are all about !!
I reference that Brandolini law quite a bit, just sans that name. Comes up here often, same with dishonest debate.A new term! Thanks.
My associated search turned this up. “The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude greater than that needed to produce it.”
Brandolini's law - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Easier to deal with bullshit and disinformation at the valve than at the nozzle end, just get creative, solutions exist, you just need the power and will to implement them. A house divided cannot stand and it is the duty of any national government to combat serious social division that does not have a just, or even real cause, or is simply based on lies. Genuine grievance is a different thing and has grass roots organization, they are not Astroturf, like the Mom and apple pie named republican efforts at propaganda.I reference that Brandolini law quite a bit, just sans that name. Comes up here often, same with dishonest debate.
what the fuck do you care what we're all about? we're small time guys, with no influence in the real world, but you seem to be trying to convert and subvert us as hard as you would try to subvert soldiers or politicians...you do understand that we, and you, are fucking nothing, to anyone outside of our circles of friends and family?Yeah! This is what you guys are all about !!
A link to a textual elaboration of that idea would be welcome.If there is one thing that defines American Culture it is the Gravity of Conformity.
You are looking at him.A link to a textual elaboration of that idea would be welcome.
Nonsense.You are looking at him.
I see. Thank you.Perhaps it is an original thought?
I can understand how that could be confusing to you.
This is not an academic forum and everything posted as opinion need not have an academic reference cited or footnotes. Conformity creates societies, it's how the French became French. English is the language of technology and everybody conforms to it globally, that's just a practical fact, even in China there are signs in English and the language is written phonetically as a pragmatic matter.Nonsense.
The idea you posted has issues. If you cannot or will not back it up using a third-party source that addresses those issues, you harm your status as an honest broker.
Well for me, one event of a thing is one event of a thing. Two instances of a thing suggests a potential third and thus a potential pattern.I see. Thank you.
I did not surrender. I came to a conclusion where before I only had a suspicion, and executed.Well for me, one event of a thing is one event of a thing. Two instances of a thing suggests a potential third and thus a potential pattern.
You and I are on our second "Push and Push back."
I'm okay with it but I do not understand why you surrender when you get a push-back.
I remember that Avatar of the Dino-Duck from way way back when I was first learning to grow on GrowKind and Cannagraphics. I've always like it and you too so that it is.
It has been my observation that in American Culture people gravitate towards conformity.
We can call it tribalism perhaps.
In a strange way we are the Monkeys of the film 2001.
To make a further point, the founders of America were steeped in a Classical education, Greek and Latin for the most part and I think some of their ideas came from them. Greece was an ancient culture of independent city states united by a common culture, religion and language, mostly because of maritime trade. Perhaps some of the American founders wanted to recreate that cradle of creativity and democracy on a grander scale with states instead of cities, unified by a common religion, language and culture (British). The people did not rebel, their democratically elected legislatures did and they were an English tradition that were in place for a long time.Nonsense.
The idea you posted has issues. If you cannot or will not back it up using a third-party source that addresses those issues, you harm your status as an honest broker.
That's the problem with liberal democracy and the rule of law. Gandhi was a lawyer and he played on the inconsistencies in the law and on democracy trumping imperialism. Britain wanted out of India since the 20's and was a liberal democracy by then with universal suffrage. Even the arch imperialist Churchill signed away the British empire in 1940 with the Atlantic Charter founding the UN. Likewise in America, if African Americans were men, then they had the same rights as white men under the law and constitution, once amended. The same thing happened with women across the Anglo world in 1920 when they got the franchise. As time goes on liberal democracy and the rule of law leads to the inclusion of more groups into society and political power. That's the problem the current crop of republicans have with it, they want minority whites only rule and the law does not work that way unless twisted and perverted to suppress the vote of people they don't like.Yeah, They wanted to create it for White Land Owners! LOL
And yet look at what has and is happening!
Pardon the WHO video. It just feels right!