Will Hunter Biden be charged and prosecuted?

Status
Not open for further replies.

doublejj

Well-Known Member
I think it is quite comical that you think that the president's son committing federal crimes is a minor thing. If that is the logic we are using then Trumps kids possible crimes should be a minor thing also. Hell if that is the logic we are using then Trump's alleged crimes should just be a blip on the radar. In my opinion they should all be charged. I am of the opinion that there is not a politician in Washington that is not guilty of a crime. But that is just me. Maybe I am to cynical. But I do not cater to one party of the other.
He should be treated just like everyone else. If you make an error on your taxes you get an opportunity to pay the taxes owed and possibly a small fine. And making a mistake on a firearm application is almost never prosecuted. He ain't nothing special treat him like everyone else
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
So you want me to believe that it was just an error. With all the money and accountants at his disposal it was just an honest mistake. Wink wink. If that is the case then I guess Trump's possible tax crimes were the same thing, an honest mistake. Not buying what you are trying to sell. Also with all the hoopla the Dems raise about gun control why aren't they out there saying that if Hunter Biden lied on his application and committed a crime that he should be charged. I guess it is politics as usual. Only call it wrong as long as it only involves the other party.
save that for the jury.....
 

Skillcraft

Well-Known Member
save that for the jury.....
I agree with you there. It is up to a jury whether or not he is guilty of any crimes. But I do not believe it will make it that far. I am not saying he is guilty but I do believe that a jury should decide if there is enough evidence to indict. I also believe that an independent person should be appointed to investigate the matter. I do not trust the feds to properly handle the matter while Biden is in office.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I think it is quite comical that you think that the president's son committing federal crimes is a minor thing. If that is the logic we are using then Trumps kids possible crimes should be a minor thing also. Hell if that is the logic we are using then Trump's alleged crimes should just be a blip on the radar. In my opinion they should all be charged. I am of the opinion that there is not a politician in Washington that is not guilty of a crime. But that is just me. Maybe I am to cynical. But I do not cater to one party of the other.
Somehow Jared’s two billion is in a different weight class, like a Liopleurodon in the water feature. You’re being a bit koi comparing Hunter’s alleged misdeeds to the corruption that swirls around That Man’s familial familiars.

1665206023813.gif

1665206156062.gif
 

Hotrod2

Well-Known Member
I was pointing out the rather busy news cycle and how a minor story like that, considering what's going on in the past week abroad and with Trump alone won't last long. Trump tends to eat up all the oxygen in the room and he will be next week with the J6 hearings. If he is worth busting, Matt Gaetz wasn't, he will be tried and if found guilty convicted, such cases if plead usually result in a fine. Joe won't lift a finger and Garland is as straight an arrow as it gets, if they lose the house there would be Benghazi level hearings about it, several, aside from impeaching Biden for fuck all once a month. McCarthy will be visiting the orange oracle at the big house on visiting days for instructions.
Nothing minor about her story is going on for 4 years.
 

Hotrod2

Well-Known Member
Making an error on your taxes & you usually only have to pay taxes owed and a fine. And making a false claim on a firearms form is almost never prosecuted & there is no reason to make an exception of him. Besides I always quit illegal drugs at least 1 hr prior to buying a new firearm, this is a pot sight after all. If you read the question on the form it's easy to check no.
Are you implying the son of the president of the United States of America should not be held accountable for his crime?
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Thing about tRumps tax troubles in New York is that its a civil case, and will have no jail time involved. Just fines, and not allowing him to do business in New York. Though the New York Attorney General has referred 2 cases to the southern district of New York, and the IRS for potential criminal charges.

dont forget Willie Nelson fucked up on his taxes bigly, and didnt go to jail, but had to pay what he owed.

Also they wont be able to use the computer information against Biden, because its said to be extremely corrupted, and 2 forensic experts that examined it said data was entered into the computer after it was left at the computer shop, and they cant tell what is real information, and what has been added.
Even the guy at the computer shop is now saying the computer was corrupted after he gave it to tRumps people. One being Rudy G.



Forensic analysis
In March 2022, The Washington Post published the findings of two forensic information analysts it had retained to examine 217 gigabytes of data provided to the paper on a hard drive by Republican activist Jack Maxey, who represented that its contents came from the laptop. One of the analysts characterized the data as a "disaster" from a forensics standpoint. The analysts found that people other than Biden had repeatedly accessed and copied data for nearly three years; they also found evidence others had written files to the drive both before and after the October 2020 New York Post reports. In September 2020, someone created six new folders on the drive, including with the names "Biden Burisma," "Salacious Pics Package" and "Hunter. Burisma Documents." One of the analysts found evidence someone may have accessed the drive contents from a West Coast location days after The New York Post published their stories about the laptop.
Using cryptographic signatures, the analysts were able to verify that from 1,828 to nearly 22,000 emails Biden had received came from the indicated email accounts of origin, suggesting they were authentic and had not been tampered with. The analysts said emails from Burisma, where Pozharskyi was an advisor, were likely authentic, but cautioned that if Burisma had been hacked, it would be possible for hackers to use stolen cryptographic signatures to forge emails that would pass as authentic. The New York Times reported in January 2020 that Russian military intelligence had hacked Burisma beginning in November 2019; a co-founder of the firm that discovered the hacking said Russians were stealing email credentials. Both analysts acknowledged that cryptographic signatures are not a perfect way to authenticate emails, as some email services do not implement the technology as rigorously as others. About 16,000 of the 22,000 emails carrying cryptographic signatures came via Google, which rigorously implements the technology. The analysts noted that cryptographic signatures can only verify that an email originated from a certain email account, but not who controlled that account; there are other means for hackers to commandeer email accounts of others.
One of the analysts found that timestamps on documents and in operating system indexes matched, though he noted hackers could forge timestamps in undetectable ways. The analysts also noted that the drive had been handled in such a way that logs and other files used by forensic analysts to examine system activity had been repeatedly deleted. Neither analyst found evidence emails or other files had been manipulated by hackers, nor could they rule out that possibility.
An analysis by Distributed Denial of Secrets of 128,755 emails allegedly copied from the laptop and circulated by allies and former staff of President Donald Trump showed "signs of tampering" including 145 modification dates and emails created more than a year after Hunter Biden had the laptop. Matt Tait, a cybersecurity expert and former information security specialist for the U.K.’s Government Communications Headquarters, reviewed the analysis and said "it is clear the cache isn’t in its original form."
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Like the Bush's and the Trumps the Bidens are a protected species.
OK, maybe I won't dispute that.

But if Hunter's dad wasn't president this would not even be news.

Same with the Bush's kids.

Same with the Trump kids.

Maybe we should concentrate more on the fathers of those kids and how they're doing?

So...which of the three fathers has a multitude of investigations into his businesses, top secret file thefts, tax evasion and insurrectionist activities just for starters?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
OK, maybe I won't dispute that.

But if Hunter's dad wasn't president this would not even be news.

Same with the Bush's kids.

Same with the Trump kids.

Maybe we should concentrate more on the fathers of those kids and how they're doing?

So...which of the three fathers has a multitude of investigations into his businesses, top secret file thefts, tax evasion and insurrectionist activities just for starters?
… and who, between the cases being developed by Letitia James and Fani Willis, is caught between a civil Scylla and an election-felony Charybdis?

1665232329871.gif
 

Skillcraft

Well-Known Member
As usual another thread that was started about the crimes of the President and his family ( the Bidens) has been hijacked and turned into another thread about the Trump's. But I will bite. Let's say Donald Trump did break the law. He should be charged. But so should have Hillary Clinton. She had a server full of the same kind of documents. But since the Dems were in power this did not happen. I think both repubs and Dems are corrupt. I do not tow the party line either way. But as I see some of you guys do. You only think it's a crime if the repubs do it. Take off your blinders and face the fact that your side is corrupt also. Neither side of the political aisle is worried about the common man. They are worried about themselves.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
As usual another thread that was started about the crimes of the President and his family ( the Bidens) has been hijacked and turned into another thread about the Trump's. But I will bite. Let's say Donald Trump did break the law. He should be charged. But so should have Hillary Clinton. She had a server full of the same kind of documents. But since the Dems were in power this did not happen. I think both repubs and Dems are corrupt. I do not tow the party line either way. But as I see some of you guys do. You only think it's a crime if the repubs do it. Take off your blinders and face the fact that your side is corrupt also. Neither side of the political aisle is worried about the common man. They are worried about themselves.
Speaking of propaganda
This drivel is an excellent example
Hillary didn’t try to pull off a faked coup or plead the fifth hundreds of times
As far as Trump being the topic he is across America
Until he pays for his actions there is no both sides except as propaganda
 

Skillcraft

Well-Known Member
Speaking of propaganda
This drivel is an excellent example
Hillary didn’t try to pull off a faked coup or plead the fifth hundreds of times
As far as Trump being the topic he is across America
Until he pays for his actions there is no both sides except as propaganda
First how you doing @herbs &Suds. Been a while. Hope you are doing good brother. So are you saying that no dem should be prosecuted until Trump is? That would be like the repubs saying Donald should not be charged over the top secret documents until Hillary is. I do not agree. If anyone and I mean anyone breaks the law they should be charged and prosecuted. That includes Donald Trump. And just out of curiosity are you saying I am spewing propaganda? I don't feel like I am. If that is what you are saying then please point out where I am. I am probably one of the few people in this thread that has voted for both parties in the last 20 years and will continue to do so as I vote for the candidate that I think will do the best for our country at that time. Sometimes it is picking the lesser of the two evils but that is what I do. I do not vote for someone just because of what party the belong to. In my opinion that is a little short sighted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top