Who will join her?

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I was thinking the same thing. Also people are leaving the Democratic party from two opposing directions; both the far left and the far right of the Democratic party are dissatisfied with what the party seems to stand for these days. Unfortunately I think it's Democratic conservatives who will be more successful is establishing a viable third party, due to the fact that many traditional conservatives are dissatisfied with the current state of the GOP, and I could see these two factions meeting in the middle with an "Extreme Center Party". Meanwhile those of us on the far left will be left in the dust as per usual, to vote for the Green or Peace & Freedom parties.
No they're not- new talking point from the GOP playbook using fear and shallow emotions 'I MUST be on the winning team' mindset, which doesn't play well with critical thinking crowd. I was wondering how long it would be before someone showed with that narrative.

You, Peej, are far from far left.
 
Last edited:

Nugnewbie

Well-Known Member
Then don’t impugn Wikipedia. You want to have your cake and eat it.

Also, support the bolded.
Thought it was common knowledge that wiki isn't reliable due to its format allowing anyone to chime in. But, educate me if I am wrong.

But, I don't know for sure. So, just asking for something to educate myself.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Thought it was common knowledge that wiki isn't reliable due to its format allowing anyone to chime in. But, educate me if I am wrong.
It is the claimant’s duty to provide documentation supporting the claim.

“Common knowledge” is valueless in these days of horse dewormer and manufactured sanctimony about furries.

ceterum censeo support the bolded.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
No they're not- new talking point from the GOP playbook using fear and shallow emotions 'I MUST be on the winning team' mindset, which doesn't play well with critical thinking crowd. I was wondering how long it would be before someone showed with that narrative.

You, Peej, are far from far left.
Dude, I live in the most liberal city in the country and have for decades. I think I know what far left is. You come from where, Florida? Your perspective of "far left" might be off a bit. People on the far left talk with each other, and share commonalities. Most of us don't support either Trump or Biden, although we did vote for Biden.

At any rate, these articles certainly show the dissatisfaction among democrats as to the current state of the party:




Here's a fun one showing the party transitions of repubs vs dems in Clark County, and you can clearly see a larger trend of people leaving the dems vs gop:

Screenshot 2022-10-11 10.35.35 AM.png
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Support the bolded. Since you capitalized it you will need to provide it in official form.



even alt-news says it


and signals a sea change from this.


You are speaking well of a stalking-horse of the dominionists.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
She should have refrained from the usage of Republican terms like "wokists", because she sounds less like an independent, and more like a right-winger. I do agree with her anti-war stance however, and that the Dem party has become war mongers.
She's not anti war, she's completely comfortable with supporting war criminals like Assad and Putin. She's against people fighting against them. Hers is fake pacifism. The peace of the dead is a better description of her idea of peace.

If you fact check this opinion piece published by aljazeera, you'll find what she says about Gabbard is true.


Tulsi Gabbard is not the pro-peace presidential candidate we want
Gabbard’s record on Syria, though it may appear as ‘pro-peace’ on the surface, actually aligns with regime propaganda.

Now, Gabbard is working to distinguish herself in a crowded Democratic presidential field as the only candidate who is able and willing to take on foreign policy. She has come under wider scrutiny for her voting record and public statements on Syria. She voted for restricting resettlement of Syrian refugees and against condemning the Assad regime for war crimes. She also met with Bashar al-Assad in the name of “truly caring for the Syrian people,” and has raised scepticism that the regime was behind the 2017 Khan Sheikhoun chemical weapons attack. She has supported the Syrian and Russian regimes in their bombing campaigns on multiple occasions and espouses a narrative that paints the entire armed Syrian opposition as al-Qaeda terrorists, erasing the legitimate call from Syrians for a regime change of their own, and defining the narrative as a US-driven regime-change war.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
It is the claimant’s duty to provide documentation supporting the claim.

“Common knowledge” is valueless in these days of horse dewormer and manufactured sanctimony about furries.

ceterum censeo support the bolded.
oh nvm item 3. He’s complaining because I pointed out a non sequitur.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
No they're not- new talking point from the GOP playbook using fear and shallow emotions 'I MUST be on the winning team' mindset, which doesn't play well with critical thinking crowd. I was wondering how long it would be before someone showed with that narrative.

You, Peej, are far from far left.
Urine good company with pee jokes it seems.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Her constituents must have thought she was a viable Democrat.they after all did elect her to represent them.
yep, and they were going to vote her out in 2020 before she preemptively dropped out of the race.
 
Last edited:
Top