The Junk Drawer

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Didn't Hopper duck behind a console? What is even more unusual is the Russians grabbed him before things really went to hell.
No. He was in the room of the Particle Accelerator in the very end after Control Room. Something happened with the PA and he had to leave Joyce and go in knowing his fate would be vaporization. When it was over she didn't see him because he blasted off the ramp and woke up on the floor that's when the Russians grabbed him. She assumed he was vaporized.

Netflix Artistic License + I'm a proud Stranger Things Super Fan..I look for flaws in movies but Centralia PA shhhhhhhhhhhhh:wink: Talk about the Upside-down.

This is loosely based on true events.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Ik ben voor de boeren/hoeren! (I support the farmers/whores)

In dutch just 1 letter difference between a farmer and a prostitute. On that note, I fully endorse this guy and want to offer up some signs and shirts that require just a little white paint to repurpose.

 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Ik ben voor de boeren/hoeren! (I support the farmers/whores)

In dutch just 1 letter difference between a farmer and a prostitute. On that note, I fully endorse this guy and want to offer up some signs and shirts that require just a little white paint to repurpose.

proof that independents can be stupid, too...
 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
Ik ben voor de boeren/hoeren! (I support the farmers/whores)

In dutch just 1 letter difference between a farmer and a prostitute. On that note, I fully endorse this guy and want to offer up some signs and shirts that require just a little white paint to repurpose.

One of eight bullet points on the topic also says that "Men should not be required to support biological children without prior agreement."
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
**If you wish to appeal a decision by the Social Security Administration, your attorney and their fee must be approved by the Social Security Administration.**

The abusive gets to decide the cop, judge and jury.

This is America. (my new series of info thanks to @Lucky Luke)
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Ik ben voor de boeren/hoeren! (I support the farmers/whores)

In dutch just 1 letter difference between a farmer and a prostitute. On that note, I fully endorse this guy and want to offer up some signs and shirts that require just a little white paint to repurpose.

You have it right..the farmers here are whores they get subsidies aka welfare to not grow..they feel better accepting the money because it's name is subsidies..big difference..they would never accept welfare..too proud.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
You have it right..the farmers here are whores they get subsidies aka welfare to not grow..they feel better accepting the money because it's name is subsidies..big difference..they would never accept welfare..too proud.
Oh same here. As one of the biggest contributors to EU we try to get some of that money back. One of the ways to do that is through agriculture subsidies. We don’t get nearly as much as Spain, France, and Germany for example, where they need it more, so we make up shit to subsidize farmers. They get welfare to maintain nature, like trees and bird nests (with drones so they don’t mow over it) and reduce emission, or switch to a solar power farm, or just for starting as a farmer. Some of it for good reasons, but in practice it’s heavily abused. Plenty of examples of farmers destroying nature while receiving subsidies to protect and maintain that same tree/pond/ditch.

What makes it really ridiculous is that they use 50% of the space to produce 1.4% gdp. Cultural sector is good for almost 4% of gdp but gets less than half the subsidies. We could close 1 large farm, build a city with a bunch of techno clubs and we’ll make more on xtc and drinks from French and Germans alone to subsidise their agriculture and ours. Ok I’m slightly exaggerating but not nearly as much as it may seem. Changes are coming though, farmers calmed down a bit, and instead of buying out hundreds or thousands small/medium ones, government will buy out large ones first. Costing again billions in tax money.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Oh same here. As one of the biggest contributors to EU we try to get some of that money back. One of the ways to do that is through agriculture subsidies. We don’t get nearly as much as Spain, France, and Germany for example, where they need it more, so we make up shit to subsidize farmers. They get welfare to maintain nature, like trees and bird nests (with drones so they don’t mow over it) and reduce emission, or switch to a solar power farm, or just for starting as a farmer. Some of it for good reasons, but in practice it’s heavily abused. Plenty of examples of farmers destroying nature while receiving subsidies to protect and maintain that same tree/pond/ditch.

What makes it really ridiculous is that they use 50% of the space to produce 1.4% gdp. Cultural sector is good for almost 4% of gdp but gets less than half the subsidies. We could close 1 large farm, build a city with a bunch of techno clubs and we’ll make more on xtc and drinks from French and Germans alone to subsidise their agriculture and ours. Ok I’m slightly exaggerating but not nearly as much as it may seem. Changes are coming though, farmers calmed down a bit, and instead of buying out hundreds or thousands small/medium ones, government will buy out large ones first. Costing again billions in tax money.
So why support farmers? Could it be that the countries remember when there was no food and people starved?
 

printer

Well-Known Member
The Israel-Lebanon maritime pact is a win for the West and a blow to Hezbollah
A historic agreement has cleared the way for oil and gas exploration in Lebanese and Israeli waters, just as winter fuel shortages haunt global markets.

While it will be years until the offshore Eastern Mediterranean fields are delivering gas and oil, the prospect of new supplies will tamp down global energy prices just as the European Union is desperately hunting for new supplies to heat and light its homes and offices. The Lebanon-Israel pact is expected to reduce the impact of the OPEC+ announcement last week to reduce oil production by 2 million barrels per day.

The war in Ukraine and sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea have squeezed Russian oil and gas supplies to Europe — pushing up prices around the world and threatening shortfalls.

Brokered by the U.S. government, Lebanon and Israel’s new pact resolved a thorny knot of disputes relating to territorial waters that, for decades, had deterred investment into energy exploration. The deal settles maritime border disputes, but can also break the blockade imposed by Hezbollah on Lebanese firms hoping to trade with Israel.

It is also a significant victory for the Biden administration, which has seen its influence wane across the Middle East. This maritime deal shows that U.S. diplomats still have credibility and leverage.

Israel expects the deal to deliver billions of dollars in foreign direct investment.

“This is a historic achievement that will strengthen Israel’s security, inject billions into the Israeli economy and ensure the stability of our northern border,” said Israel’s Prime Minister Yair Lapid.

The draft agreement respects all the security and economic principles set out by Israel, Lapid said, fending off criticism from some right-wing lawmakers, including former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who blasted the government for its “surrender” to the Hezbollah.

Lebanon is more measured. Hezbollah, an Iran proxy, is designated as a terrorist organization by a large portion of the international community. It is also a terror group that continues to dominate Lebanese politics and is opposed to any economic ties to or diplomatic recognition of Israel. Given the complex compromises needed in Beirut’s politics, Lebanese politicians have cautioned that, despite the draft agreement, there is no guarantee the two countries will sign a treaty, it is “not a step towards normalization” and they are still “technically at war,” according to CNN.

Earlier, Hezbollah had threatened to destroy the gas platforms if production began before the Iran-backed Shiite militia allowed it. Iran produces a tremendous amount of natural gas out of its offshore South Pars field and a new offshore Lebanese gas field would increase competition and slash prices.

On top of all that, Lebanon has laws dating back to 1955 that bar business with Israel, which declared independence in 1948. For years, these laws have been selectively enforced, sometimes against the Lebanese business leaders that Hezbollah sought to personally punish.

Events have forced Hezbollah to accept a deal with its “sworn enemy,” Israel. The Lebanese economy is reeling from inflation, worker protests, bombings and waves of refugees from neighboring Syria, which has been cursed by civil war for more than a decade. Foreign investment, even from Lebanese expatriates, is drying up.

Iran, too, is yielding to new, painful realities. Iran is losing men and money supporting the Houthis, another Shiite militia in Yemen, as Saudi Arabia sends air and ground fighters to support the recognized government in Sana’a. Meanwhile, Iran’s “victories” in Syria are becoming costly in both blood and treasure. U.S. and EU sanctions against Iran remain in place, denying Iran the expertise and technology to upgrade its energy infrastructure and obstructing lucrative markets to sell its black gold. Add to that, thousands of women are protesting Islamic laws in Iran’s major cities. Every light on the mullah’s dashboard is flashing red.

Could the U.S drive a wedge between Iran and its proxy, Hezbollah? This would require a lot of skillful collaboration among the U.S., the EU and Arab allies, under the umbrella of American leadership akin to its long-game Cold War strategy.

With patience and deftness, it could be done. The Lebanon-Israel maritime pact may be the first step.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
So why support farmers? Could it be that the countries remember when there was no food and people starved?
Why does who support farmers? 80% is for export. It’s an industry, not philanthropy, not a civil duty, it’s all about the benjamins. State support isn’t allowed in EU except for well, exceptions, which include heavily lobbying meat industries who abuse the myth and emotional appeal “without farmers, no food”. We have a nitrogen emission problem, preventing building projects, causing a housing shortage of 900k homes (on 18mil population), and that’s in great part because farmers do a whole lot more than preventing people from starving. I have a lot of respect for the profession, not the industry or abuse of subsidies.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member

One of the larger parties here (Democrats 66, left) has been on a mission to legalize XTC and ketamine (first medicinal but also recreational) for a few years already. Part of it is clearly because most of their base is young, used to be the ‘student party. No longer a fair label, good party. They’re making progress to and it seems inevitable, possibly sooner than working out the flaws in cannabis/coffeeshopsystem. If legalizing XTC/MDMA seems crazy, as the largest producer, we have 4 decades of experience, a large amount of the population used it once or more (in my case a few times a year, ok monthly, after an almost 25 year hiatus), and the total number of addicts is zero point zero. A few deaths (temp regulation or just poison in pills) but per individual and for the society the damage is far less then…. cannabis, let alone harder drugs. Research by universities and professors and millions of users confirm this. XTC is relatively very harmless. And apparently great for people with ptsd.

Obviously, I agree. Legalize, regulate, test and tax. But coke… I don’t like people on coke, it’s like a worse version of alcohol. Ironically this same mayor (was leader Green Left, otherwise very progressive) wants to close coffeeshops for tourists. Over the past 3 decades my response to anything that isn’t cannabis, xtc, or alcohol has been nah thanks. All will be legal in my lifetime, so no matter how real life may feel to you, you’re all in my sim, I’m the boy in Steven Spielbergs A.I., I’m Neo, I‘m high and I’m drunk and I do miss Jim, can’t that crazy Irish fuck apologize for w/e and be let back in so there’s at least one person crazier than I am…
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Why does who support farmers? 80% is for export. It’s an industry, not philanthropy, not a civil duty, it’s all about the benjamins. State support isn’t allowed in EU except for well, exceptions, which include heavily lobbying meat industries who abuse the myth and emotional appeal “without farmers, no food”. We have a nitrogen emission problem, preventing building projects, causing a housing shortage of 900k homes (on 18mil population), and that’s in great part because farmers do a whole lot more than preventing people from starving. I have a lot of respect for the profession, not the industry or abuse of subsidies.
Sure, 80% is for export when you have lots. But what happens if there is a famine? When the world functions properly and life is good you wonder. But with the supply chains being disrupted you see that our systems are not as robust as we thought. When you have your food source nearby you worry less than if not. This goes back to WWII. I still have enough relatives that lived through it and my parents were driven by the experience (ask me how many potatoes we grew and ate). Supposidly those days are over but so was the idea of war in Europe.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Oh same here. As one of the biggest contributors to EU we try to get some of that money back. One of the ways to do that is through agriculture subsidies. We don’t get nearly as much as Spain, France, and Germany for example, where they need it more, so we make up shit to subsidize farmers. They get welfare to maintain nature, like trees and bird nests (with drones so they don’t mow over it) and reduce emission, or switch to a solar power farm, or just for starting as a farmer. Some of it for good reasons, but in practice it’s heavily abused. Plenty of examples of farmers destroying nature while receiving subsidies to protect and maintain that same tree/pond/ditch.

What makes it really ridiculous is that they use 50% of the space to produce 1.4% gdp. Cultural sector is good for almost 4% of gdp but gets less than half the subsidies. We could close 1 large farm, build a city with a bunch of techno clubs and we’ll make more on xtc and drinks from French and Germans alone to subsidise their agriculture and ours. Ok I’m slightly exaggerating but not nearly as much as it may seem. Changes are coming though, farmers calmed down a bit, and instead of buying out hundreds or thousands small/medium ones, government will buy out large ones first. Costing again billions in tax money.
There are times when I feel government needs a watchdog to step up and say 'enough'..get lucky enough with an attorney that actually believes in the cause. Many are transactional in nature and don't care. But yeah subsidies.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member

We call it overfishing because of the size level,” Michael Litzow, the Kodiak lab director for NOAA Fisheries, told CNN. “But it wasn’t overfishing that caused the collapse, that much is clear.”

Litzow says human-caused climate change is a significant factor in the crabs’ alarming disappearance.


It's either global warming or aliens that reside in the underground pyramid in Alaska..retired serviceman stationed in Alaska and documents that have been de-classified have some interesting stories to tell..they're not in code, rather plain English..no need to wait for an alphabet letter to give me instructions.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Last edited:

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus

One of the larger parties here (Democrats 66, left) has been on a mission to legalize XTC and ketamine (first medicinal but also recreational) for a few years already. Part of it is clearly because most of their base is young, used to be the ‘student party. No longer a fair label, good party. They’re making progress to and it seems inevitable, possibly sooner than working out the flaws in cannabis/coffeeshopsystem. If legalizing XTC/MDMA seems crazy, as the largest producer, we have 4 decades of experience, a large amount of the population used it once or more (in my case a few times a year, ok monthly, after an almost 25 year hiatus), and the total number of addicts is zero point zero. A few deaths (temp regulation or just poison in pills) but per individual and for the society the damage is far less then…. cannabis, let alone harder drugs. Research by universities and professors and millions of users confirm this. XTC is relatively very harmless. And apparently great for people with ptsd.

Obviously, I agree. Legalize, regulate, test and tax. But coke… I don’t like people on coke, it’s like a worse version of alcohol. Ironically this same mayor (was leader Green Left, otherwise very progressive) wants to close coffeeshops for tourists. Over the past 3 decades my response to anything that isn’t cannabis, xtc, or alcohol has been nah thanks. All will be legal in my lifetime, so no matter how real life may feel to you, you’re all in my sim, I’m the boy in Steven Spielbergs A.I., I’m Neo, I‘m high and I’m drunk and I do miss Jim, can’t that crazy Irish fuck apologize for w/e and be let back in so there’s at least one person crazier than I am…
Fear not. There are posters here plainly crazier than you.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Sure, 80% is for export when you have lots. But what happens if there is a famine? When the world functions properly and life is good you wonder. But with the supply chains being disrupted you see that our systems are not as robust as we thought. When you have your food source nearby you worry less than if not. This goes back to WWII. I still have enough relatives that lived through it and my parents were driven by the experience (ask me how many potatoes we grew and ate). Supposidly those days are over but so was the idea of war in Europe.
“But famine and war” is another version of the “no farmers, no food” emotional appeal. It doesn’t reflect the reality where 80% of export isn’t a number that can prevent or solve famine or the effect of wars and doesn’t make a good argument for what is a major issue. Nobody is suggesting to get rid of all of that 80% and not have plenty of reserves. The risk of war and famine is constant and no reason to produce 80% too much structurally. Right now, northwest europe’s agricultural industry with some areas being 75% for ‘growing’ animals, is a net food consumer, not producer.

The majority is meat and dairy, which are luxury products and contribute to, not solve or prevent, famine. Most not products that feed the hungry. It requires a fraction of the space, energy, emission and pollution of the insane high chicken/cow/pig population to create the same amount of protein from plants. In fact, there is already enough plant-based proteïn to feed the entire world, comfortably. One of the reasons there is famine, directly and indirectly through climate change, is the intensive farm industry where perfectly fine food, some grown on former rainforests, is fed to animals so us animals can eat those animals. A very inefficient unsustainable method but good business.

“if there is famine” it’s not because a country decided to not destroy the little nature it has left and follow EU regulations on emission limits in place to prevent the main cause of famine. One of the main reasons there is famine in the world is not also a solution to it.
 
Top