Vaccinated stay contagious longer than Unvaccinated

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
This recent study in the Lancet is quite interesting:

Especially this table, which shows negative vaccine efficacy and confidence intervals, which effectively means that the vaccine is causing more people to get covid vs the control group:

Screenshot - 2022-10-21T165116.929.png
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
Maine doctor’s license suspended over COVID-19 claims
Doesn't say what the "misinformation" was. Great journalism.

Did you notice that covid issues are absent in polling? Do you think the absolute huge mass of voters that will vote on this single issue will all be guilty of misinformation?
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Maine doctor’s license suspended over COVID-19 claims
Yeah, they just passed a law here in California that no doctor can go against the mainstream covid narrative. So much for "ask your doctor", when we already know that the doctor has to tell you something very specific or risk losing their license.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
This recent study in the Lancet is quite interesting:

Especially this table, which shows negative vaccine efficacy and confidence intervals, which effectively means that the vaccine is causing more people to get covid vs the control group:

View attachment 5215917
I own stock in Pfizer therefore this is misinformation.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Doesn't say what the "misinformation" was. Great journalism.

Did you notice that covid issues are absent in polling? Do you think the absolute huge mass of voters that will vote on this single issue will all be guilty of misinformation?
They mention it here, which is linked from the AP article. Basically she lied about the reason for prescribing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, by saying that her patient has Lyme disease. If the medications were treated as they always has been in the past, and has been allowed to be written off label, she wouldn't have every had to lie. She was basically painted into a corner in order to treat her patients.

 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
Yeah, they just passed a law here in California that no doctor can go against the mainstream covid narrative. So much for "ask your doctor", when we already know that the doctor has to tell you something very specific or risk losing their license.
It's more like so much for "the CDC" with the recent addition of covid "vaccinations" to the school regimen.

They just can't stop fucking with the kids, it's literally political suicide yet they just keep going.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
It's more like so much for "the CDC" with the recent addition of covid "vaccinations" to the school regimen.

They just can't stop fucking with the kids, it's literally political suicide yet they just keep going.
They're really shooting themselves in the foot with that one. First off, how do you put a EUA product on an annual schedule?? That makes zero sense.

Secondly, all they will do is cause more distrust of vaccines in general, to those who are already skeptical.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
They mention it here, which is linked from the AP article. Basically she lied about the reason for prescribing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, by saying that her patient has Lyme disease. If the medications were treated as they always has been in the past, and has been allowed to be written off label, she wouldn't have every had to lie. She was basically painted into a corner in order to treat her patients.

This happened a LOT. Pharmacists overrode doctors for pure political bullshit.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
They're really shooting themselves in the foot with that one. First off, how do you put a EUA product on an annual schedule?? That makes zero sense.

Secondly, all they will do is cause more distrust of vaccines in general, to those who are already skeptical.
I know a metric fuck ton of single issue voters and this is their one issue. This would probably poll in the top 3, about 499,670,781 issues above abortion.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
They're really shooting themselves in the foot with that one. First off, how do you put a EUA product on an annual schedule?? That makes zero sense.

Secondly, all they will do is cause more distrust of vaccines in general, to those who are already skeptical.
Same way you put it on the Military schedule. Just do it. It's the totalitarian way.
 

DoubleAtotheRON

Well-Known Member
This recent study in the Lancet is quite interesting:

Especially this table, which shows negative vaccine efficacy and confidence intervals, which effectively means that the vaccine is causing more people to get covid vs the control group:

View attachment 5215917
I've been saying this from the beginning. I just didn't believe the science. I've had it twice. First time was not bad, just lasted a long time (like 3 weeks).. second time was a non event. Kinda like bad allergies. Everyone I know has had it. Nobody died that had no underlying medical conditions like COPD, Congestive heart failure, etc. that the seasonal Flu would have taken them out anyways. Nobody except my parents had to be hospitalized ... and they were the only ones vaxxed. Every other family member has not.
 

DoubleAtotheRON

Well-Known Member
Yeah, science, what a crock of shit.

Ok.. hold up chief.... I didn't say I didn't believe in science. I think it's the backbone of where we are today. Im just saying that IF they truly had a long term study of this vax, they would discover that it does have side affects. Too short of a period for me to take a jab when they don't know what's going to happen to you in say the next 5-8 years.
 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
I didn't say I didn't believe in science.

Too short of a period for me to take a jab when they don't know what's going to happen to you in say the next 5-8 years.
An incredibly high percentage of scientists say that you will have an increased chance of not being dead in 5-8 years.

Like a fool, I’ll continue listening to them and try to resist the urge to listen to the advice of those who tell quaint little stores.
 
Top