BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
they're not gonna need that are they......awwwww
Having seen their equipment and level of incompetence, they will kill more of their troops than Ukrainians. The beards and whiskers will come off the Ukrainians pretty quick and they are well equipped to deal with it. The Russians on the other hand campout in the radioactive red forest in complete ignorance of things most Ukrainian high school students know. If they use a dirty bomb in Ukraine, it will be the same as if they used a tactical nuke as far as consequences go and do them absolutely no good, with a possible radioactive cloud and fallout over either western Europe or Russia itself. The conscripts aren't even getting first aid equipment, much less rotten 40-year-old old gas masks and nothing else. They don't even have enough water to drink, let alone decontaminate themselves and equipment and no one has been properly trained, even if they had the equipment. Mass Russian surrenders might be the unexpected result as everybody looks to get out of the area.now why are u doing this RA
Russian forces "preparing to work under radioactive contamination" - Moscow
Russia's Defence Ministry said on Monday that it had prepared its forces to work in conditions of radioactive contamination, after Moscow accused Ukraine of planning to detonate a "dirty bomb" - something Kyiv has strongly denied.www.reuters.com
don't do it
I'll bet they are guarding the bridges now and I heard they took control of the Belarus railroad a while back, because the Union was disrupting traffic. The simple truth is, if you can cut the rail lines from Russia, you cut off the Russians from projecting power, or resupply, they cannot operate very far from their railheads. Why this Achillies heel has not been exploited more is a mystery to me, ATCMS and an agreed upon target list could have done it in Ukraine or around its borders. The Russians have specialized railway units that can rapidly repair tracks and operate trains in combat zones. Repairing or replacing rail bridges is another matter and takes time, not that big a bang is required either if you derail a moving train on a bridge by dropping a missile in front of it as it crosses a bridge. If they can hit the rail bridge once, they can do it again while the repair crew is there, only this time with 200K tungsten balls in the warhead.they're not gonna need that are they......awwwww
fuck em, i hope it's not propaganda...i hope they're there to counter strike the minute putin crosses a line...i'm so fucking sick of that guyOnly if Vlad does something really stupid in Ukraine, the Russians using a nuke before the election would sure make Americans fall in line behind the president as the level of existential threat rose. So, the Magats had better hope their buddies the Russians don't do it, because in time of war people usually get behind the president. Russia using a nuke will definitely give folks that war feeling of fear that an external threat provides and causes the bigger tribe of America to pull together in the face of it.
More Russian or Magat propaganda, it's hard to tell the difference really, and does it really matter? Shit is shit no matter what asshole grunts it out.
Like I said, it would be a bad idea, but not one past these dumb cunts. Trump wanted to nuke hurricanes and yer dealing with the Russian version it would appear.
A group of 30 House progressives sent a letter to President Joe Biden this Monday calling for his administration to shift their Ukraine policy and pursue direct negotiations with Russia, The Washington Post reported yesterday.
The letter was headed by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and called on Biden to move forward with a “proactive diplomatic push, redoubling efforts to seek a realistic framework for a cease fire.”
The letter received fierce pushback from many Democrats, prompting Jayapal to put out a statement later on Monday “clarifying” their position, stressing that they still supported Ukraine.
“Let me be clear: we are united as Democrats in our unequivocal commitment to supporting Ukraine in their fight for their democracy and freedom in the face of the illegal and outrageous Russian invasion,” Jayapal said. “Diplomacy is an important tool that can save lives — but it is just one tool.”
Now, the Congressional Progressive Caucus has announced that they are withdrawing the letter altogether, claiming that the letter was "drafted several months ago" and was "released by staff without vetting."
"Because of the timing, our message in being conflated by some as being equivalent to the recent statement by Republican Leader McCarthy threatening to end aid to Ukraine if Republicans take over."
Senior House Republican Kevin McCarthy said last week that if his party makes widely expected gains in the midterms, it will not write "a blank check" to war-torn Ukraine.
The warning was the first official signal that Kyiv could face a tougher fight for US funding as it fends off Russia's invasion, with support beginning to wane in Washington.
READ: Kanye West plummets from billionaire list with loss of Adidas deal
McCarthy hopes to become House speaker -- the third-most senior position in US politics behind the president and vice president -- if Republicans take over the House of Representatives in the November 8 vote.
Since the start of Russia's invasion in February, the United States has allocated $17.6 billion in military aid to Ukraine -- although this is a fraction of the total bill including humanitarian assistance.
\u201cINBOX: "The Congressional Progressive Caucus hereby withdraws its recent letter to the White House regarding Ukraine."\u201d
— Frank Thorp V (@Frank Thorp V) 1666716136
I figured as much their social media accounts were too hot to touch and their phones were ringing off the hooks, the blow back was intense and immediate from the base, while the leadership called them idiots.
Too late, the republicans will make hay with it until election day or as another "no difference between them so stay home" talking point. The damage has been done in a world where facts don't matter much or are spun out of all recognition. Will Foxnews cover it? If so, how much? Will the letter be more widely known than the retraction?
With Mitch and Pence stepping up to the plate for the GOP, it neutralizes the democrat's advantage with McCarthy's asshole announcement of a funding cut for Ukraine. It all gives aid and comfort to America's sworn enemy in a hot war with a valuable ally. An ally who is growing in value with each battlefield victory over the Russians, considering they have one fucking hand tied behind their backs! What a great economical investment! The Pentagon has no problems with it at all and are Ukraine's biggest fans. Furthermore, there is the added bonus of the Russians paying the whole shot with the money already frozen, including the aid given by Uncle Sam and others paid back with interest.The timing seems odd. The letter was sent around and signed in the summer.
Several who did sign, said they wouldn't do so currently because of the changing circumstances.
If the Dems can find a way to shoot themselves in the foot, they invariably do.
It strikes me as a priority mismatch of unusual proportions. In the event of a nuclear warshot, our elections become as irrelevant as whether the outfit of the firefighter carrying you out of the collapsing skyscraper matches your shoes or not.Like I said, it would be a bad idea, but not one past these dumb cunts. Trump wanted to nuke hurricanes and yer dealing with the Russian version it would appear.
Russia calls for UN Security Council probe of alleged biological labs in Ukraine
Russia has drafted a United Nations Security Council resolution that would investigate Moscow’s claims that the U.S. and Ukraine are violating prohibitions on biological weapons through work at Ukrainian biological laboratories, The Associated Press reported.
Moscow for months has levied the allegations, which were previously condemned as “classic” Russian propaganda by U.S. intelligence officials, who say Ukraine operates just over a dozen biolabs for public health and biodefense purposes with U.S. assistance.
The Associated Press, citing a copy it obtained of the draft resolution, reported that Russia is filing a complaint under the Biological Weapons Convention, which was signed in 1972 to ban the development and use of biological and toxin weapons.
The resolution would create a 15-member commission authorized by the Security Council to investigate the claims, the outlet reported.
The Associated Press reported that the commission would report to the Security Council by Nov. 30 and establish a review conference in Geneva, Switzerland from Nov. 28 through Dec. 16.
The U.S. publicly acknowledges its support for Ukrainian biolabs but notes that they were developed as part of the biological threat reduction program, which seeks to improve abilities to detect and report outbreaks of dangerous pathogens before they cause major threats.
Russia, however, began accusing the two countries of developing biological weapons in the early days of Russia’s invasion.
U.S. and Western officials have long accused Russia of making false accusations and staging “false flag” operations to justify its invasion of Ukraine.
The Hill has reached out to the U.S. mission to the United Nations for comment.
The war in recent weeks has largely concentrated in Ukraine’s south, where Ukrainian forces are making gains closer to Kherson, the sole Ukrainian regional capital controlled by Russia.
Kyiv has accused Russia of planning to blow up a major dam that could flood the city and affect cooling efforts at Ukraine’s largest nuclear plant.
Moscow, meanwhile, has accused Kyiv of planning to use a radioactive “dirty bomb.” The U.S. has rejected those allegations and warned they could be a pretext to Russian attacks.
Russia calls for UN Security Council probe of alleged biological labs in Ukraine
Russia has drafted a United Nations Security Council resolution that would investigate Moscow’s claims that the U.S. and Ukraine are violating prohibitions on biological weapons through work at Ukr…thehill.com
The dirty bomb did not stick to the wall, maybe this will?