He wasn't POTUS in 2012 he was Vice POTUS, and the Obama administration was as clean as a cat's asshole. Ask the DOE, they funded the scientist who started the company and the university that owns the rights. The technology is not that important for national defense and the greener China is the better, there are many competitive options becoming available for energy storage, they make peaking easier and increase grid efficiency, for renewables there are base load batteries and those that deal with sudden demands. If they didn't license it the Chinese would just steal it anyway, most patients only last 16 years and enforcement varies widely, in Japan if you patented the first car and it was black, someone could just produce a red one and break your patient. The patient is a public record and its online for anyone to see and might only have a few years until expiry.The intellectual property is that of the US taxpayer though via the Pacific Northwest National Lab.
So why did Bidens DOE give it to China in 2012 and they now have the world's largest battery farm with our tech? Maybe that's why he's the big guy that gets 10% huh.
Governments deal in policy through law and regulation and budgets, it's a question of priorities. For example, Trump stealing money from military families and schools to build his dumbass wall because his republican congress wouldn't, not even they were that fucking dumb.So liberal and conservative policies are social, but they are called bills that run through the Legislature which is the nation's purse because they have to be funded but these bills totally have nothing to do with Economics.
Ok.
The intellectual property is that of the US taxpayer though via the Pacific Northwest National Lab.
So why did Bidens DOE give it to China in 2012 and they now have the world's largest battery farm with our tech? Maybe that's why he's the big guy that gets 10% huh.
I transposed the 1 and 2. My bad.He wasn't POTUS in 2012 he was Vice POTUS, and the Obama administration was as clean as a cat's asshole. Ask the DOE, they funded the scientist who started the company and the university that owns the rights. The technology is not that important for national defense and the greener China is the better, there are many competitive options becoming available for energy storage, they make peaking easier and increase grid efficiency, for renewables there are base load batteries and those that deal with sudden demands. If they didn't license it the Chinese would just steal it anyway, most patients only last 16 years and enforcement varies widely, in Japan if you patented the first car and it was black, someone could just produce a red one and break your patient. The patient is a public record and its online for anyone to see and might only have a few years until expiry.
Next foxnews talking point?
I got 2 more. "Let's Go Brandon!".I transposed the 1 and 2. My bad.
President Schmo Bliben's DOE transferred the license to Vandis who clearly said they would be made in China even though the license requirement was made in USA.
"Two words, made in America."
"End of quote"I got 2 more. "Let's Go Brandon!".
Yeah try NPR.Next foxnews talking point?
Do the Cheneys stand with Joe in the belief that "poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids" because their being "republicians" was always just a ruse?The Cheney Family will never let Trump be elected again..something about over my dead body+Congress is putting stops in place so someone and his grifter family can't do this again.
Actually in churchIndoctrination begins in the public school system.
No, because church isn't compulsory like school is.Actually in church
The dominionists want to change that by making some of their desiderata law.No, because church isn't compulsory like school is.
There are always extremists in every faction, however it doesn't change the current state of things.The dominionists want to change that by making some of their desiderata law.
The current state of things is why the firewall between church and state must be shored up. Ten-year-old rape victims are being done over by libertarians working with dominionists; a repudiation of freedom by the ones who use the word the most.There are always extremists in every faction, however it doesn't change the current state of things.
Freedom is a matter of perspective. While I support a woman's right to choose, I also understand how the right believes that it's stripping the rights of the unborn. It's important to be able to understand the perspectives of your opponents.The current state of things is why the firewall between church and state must be shored up. Ten-year-old rape victims are being done over by libertarians working with dominionists; a repudiation of freedom by the ones who use the word the most.
The intellectual dishonesty is distilled into the word unborn. Personhood does not begin at conception. That is the lie and the lever of tge Jesus Taliban.Freedom is a matter of perspective. While I support a woman's right to choose, I also understand how the right believes that it's stripping the rights of the unborn. It's important to be able to understand the perspectives of your opponents.
I don't disagree myself, however my point was to be able to understand your opponent's perspective, which seems difficult for you.The intellectual dishonesty is distilled into the word unborn. Personhood does not begin at conception. That is the lie and the lever of tge Jesus Taliban.
Thank God there's still some Democrats that haven't drank the Koolaid.Freedom is a matter of perspective. While I support a woman's right to choose, I also understand how the right believes that it's stripping the rights of the unborn. It's important to be able to understand the perspectives of your opponents.
I understand it, which is why I recognize how dangerous it is. I saw it from the inside.I don't disagree myself, however my point was to be able to understand your opponent's perspective, which seems difficult for you.
Out of curiosity, when do you believe that "personhood" begins?