Examples of GOP Leadership

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member

McCarthy faces GOP blowback after N.Y. Times leak

Some angry GOP lawmakers warn that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's position could be on rocky ground after a report he blamed members of his leadership team for Republicans' chaos over the budget.

Why it matters: Multiple House Republicans argued McCarthy’s criticism of Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) undermines their messaging and opens the floodgates for public infighting earlier than necessary.

McCarthy told colleagues he lacks confidence that Arrington can deliver a budget proposal, according to an explosive New York Times article published Thursday.
The California Republican also reportedly told allies he views Scalise as “ineffective” and unwilling to take hard positions.
McCarthy didn’t deny conversations with allies disparaging two of his top deputies, but said he rejects the idea of splits existing among leadership.
Between the lines: House conservatives say they aren’t ready to pull the trigger on a motion to vacate that could oust McCarthy as speaker.

But this has ramped up the level of conversations.
What they’re saying: A GOP lawmaker accused McCarthy of using Scalise and Arrington as scapegoats before budget and debt ceiling negotiations have fully imploded.

“The members I've spoken with are just stunned by his rebuking of his budget chair, and certainly of our leadership,” another House Republican told Axios.
“I can't imagine [he will last an entire term].”
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) – one of McCarthy’s 20 defectors who sits on the Budget Committee — blasted the infighting and called for McCarthy to take a larger role.

“The agreements made by Speaker McCarthy, among other things, is to begin the ten year balanced budget NOW and with his initiatives & directives, it’s HIS responsibility to get the 218 votes to ensure our nation’s financial security JUST AS HE DID IN SECURING THE 218 votes for speaker.”
Behind the scenes: The report has reopened old wounds between McCarthy and Scalise — who was previously seen as a rival and potential speaker contender if the California Republican failed to obtain the gavel.

Others complained that the attacks undermine their messaging on their legislative accomplishments as the party looks to demonstrate they have governed in a narrow majority.
The bottom line: Arrington and Scalise opted against publicly criticizing the California Republican, with Arrington telling Axios in an exclusive statement:

“Our nation is staring down the barrel of a debt crisis and my budget committee colleagues and I are focused on one thing: passing a budget that will stop this reckless spending and restore fiscal sanity in Washington before it’s too late."
They are SOOO fucked...They JUMPED into this puddle of shit with both feet, and seem to be enjoying the subsequent shit storm. Despite their trying to pass the buck, quite literally, the budget is on them, and they know that. They have NOTHING that has even a slight chance of passing the senate, much less Biden's veto. Maybe it will finally open the eyes of some of the stupider magats, when they stop getting their SS checks and unemployment checks, when the foodstamps they live on because their red state legislatures can't run a state without federal assistance quit coming...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I think the democrats are gonna let Kevin keep digging his grave and wait until the last minute then propose their solution and then get enough republicans to vote for it. They have little choice in the matter and must let them fall on their faces, even it means harm to the country, it's not like they control the house. Perhaps a few republicans from close districts will break ranks to escape the clown show, if not America will default and we will enter a new reality. Not to worry though the economic damage will be all Biden's fault, Foxnews will lie about the true cause of the harm and thus harm the country yet again for profit. You can't fix the problem if you don't know what the problem is and are more likely to repeat the mistake, over and over again, like with covid and J6. Add in the destruction of the full faith and credit of the USA to the pile of wreckage, until you decide to do something about it.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Settlement reached in defamation lawsuit against Lou Dobbs, Fox News
A settlement has been reached in a Venezuelan businessman’s defamation lawsuit against Fox News and host Lou Dobbs over statements accusing him of helping tilt the 2020 presidential election.

In a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Louis Lee Stanton filed in the Southern District of New York over the weekend, lawyers for the two parties wrote they had reached an agreement to resolve the matter. Financial terms of the agreement were not specified.

Majed Khalil filed his lawsuit in 2021, alleging statements made on Dobbs’s social media and by pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell on Dobbs’s Fox Business show defamed him by accusing the businessman of executing an “electoral 9/11” and helping change ballot counts in voting machines.

“The 2020 Election is a cyber Pearl Harbor: The leftwing establishment have aligned their forces to overthrow the United States government,” Dobbs wrote in a Twitter post that remains online.

According to Khalil’s complaint, as Powell was appearing on one of his shows, the host asked, “You say these four individuals led the effort to rig this election. How did they do it?”

Dobbs and Fox’s attorney had moved to have the case dismissed on First Amendment grounds, a motion the judge denied last fall.

“This matter has been resolved amicably by both sides,” a Fox News spokesperson said when contacted Sunday by The Hill. “We have no further comment.”

Fox canceled Dobbs’ show in February of 2021.

The network is separately fighting a $1.6 Billion defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems over similar claims about the 2020 election made on its air. Fox has also argued the claims made Dominion in that case are protected by the First Amendment.

“This case is and always has been about the First Amendment protections of the media’s absolute right to cover the news,” the network said in a recent statement about the Dominion case. “Fox will continue to fiercely advocate for the rights of free speech and a free press as we move into the next phase of these proceedings.”

A trial in the Dominion case is slated to begin later this month.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Settlement reached in defamation lawsuit against Lou Dobbs, Fox News
A settlement has been reached in a Venezuelan businessman’s defamation lawsuit against Fox News and host Lou Dobbs over statements accusing him of helping tilt the 2020 presidential election.

In a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Louis Lee Stanton filed in the Southern District of New York over the weekend, lawyers for the two parties wrote they had reached an agreement to resolve the matter. Financial terms of the agreement were not specified.

Majed Khalil filed his lawsuit in 2021, alleging statements made on Dobbs’s social media and by pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell on Dobbs’s Fox Business show defamed him by accusing the businessman of executing an “electoral 9/11” and helping change ballot counts in voting machines.

“The 2020 Election is a cyber Pearl Harbor: The leftwing establishment have aligned their forces to overthrow the United States government,” Dobbs wrote in a Twitter post that remains online.

According to Khalil’s complaint, as Powell was appearing on one of his shows, the host asked, “You say these four individuals led the effort to rig this election. How did they do it?”

Dobbs and Fox’s attorney had moved to have the case dismissed on First Amendment grounds, a motion the judge denied last fall.

“This matter has been resolved amicably by both sides,” a Fox News spokesperson said when contacted Sunday by The Hill. “We have no further comment.”

Fox canceled Dobbs’ show in February of 2021.

The network is separately fighting a $1.6 Billion defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems over similar claims about the 2020 election made on its air. Fox has also argued the claims made Dominion in that case are protected by the First Amendment.

“This case is and always has been about the First Amendment protections of the media’s absolute right to cover the news,” the network said in a recent statement about the Dominion case. “Fox will continue to fiercely advocate for the rights of free speech and a free press as we move into the next phase of these proceedings.”

A trial in the Dominion case is slated to begin later this month.
i sure would like to read the details of that settlement....
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
They are SOOO fucked...They JUMPED into this puddle of shit with both feet, and seem to be enjoying the subsequent shit storm. Despite their trying to pass the buck, quite literally, the budget is on them, and they know that. They have NOTHING that has even a slight chance of passing the senate, much less Biden's veto. Maybe it will finally open the eyes of some of the stupider magats, when they stop getting their SS checks and unemployment checks, when the foodstamps they live on because their red state legislatures can't run a state without federal assistance quit coming...
reading between the lines, SLOTH is angry that those budget guys were compromising with Democrats to advance an issue he wants to exploit to showcase a “tough yet effective” leadership style. Eat poo, Kev.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Settlement reached in defamation lawsuit against Lou Dobbs, Fox News
A settlement has been reached in a Venezuelan businessman’s defamation lawsuit against Fox News and host Lou Dobbs over statements accusing him of helping tilt the 2020 presidential election.

In a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Louis Lee Stanton filed in the Southern District of New York over the weekend, lawyers for the two parties wrote they had reached an agreement to resolve the matter. Financial terms of the agreement were not specified.

Majed Khalil filed his lawsuit in 2021, alleging statements made on Dobbs’s social media and by pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell on Dobbs’s Fox Business show defamed him by accusing the businessman of executing an “electoral 9/11” and helping change ballot counts in voting machines.

“The 2020 Election is a cyber Pearl Harbor: The leftwing establishment have aligned their forces to overthrow the United States government,” Dobbs wrote in a Twitter post that remains online.

According to Khalil’s complaint, as Powell was appearing on one of his shows, the host asked, “You say these four individuals led the effort to rig this election. How did they do it?”

Dobbs and Fox’s attorney had moved to have the case dismissed on First Amendment grounds, a motion the judge denied last fall.

“This matter has been resolved amicably by both sides,” a Fox News spokesperson said when contacted Sunday by The Hill. “We have no further comment.”

Fox canceled Dobbs’ show in February of 2021.

The network is separately fighting a $1.6 Billion defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems over similar claims about the 2020 election made on its air. Fox has also argued the claims made Dominion in that case are protected by the First Amendment.

“This case is and always has been about the First Amendment protections of the media’s absolute right to cover the news,” the network said in a recent statement about the Dominion case. “Fox will continue to fiercely advocate for the rights of free speech and a free press as we move into the next phase of these proceedings.”

A trial in the Dominion case is slated to begin later this month.
Lou was worth a few bucks, he founded space.com and has other business interests, he has deep pockets.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
reading between the lines, SLOTH is angry that those budget guys were compromising with Democrats to advance an issue he wants to exploit to showcase a “tough yet effective” leadership style. Eat poo, Kev.
mccarthy wants to show a "tough yet effective" leadership style?....How in the blue fuck is that supposed to work?
He had to kiss the collective ass of the insurrection causus after 14 FAILED votes for speaker, to finally win a position he has used to accomplish NOTHING, except giving fuckface carlson years worth of sensitive security footage from the capital building to use in a campaign of lies to try to excuse trump's failed insurrection attempt.
He's a pathetic asskissing toady, beholden to people who are going to attempt to use him to destroy democracy, and install themselves as leaders in a white nationalist theocracy...
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
mccarthy wants to show a "tough yet effective" leadership style?....How in the blue fuck is that supposed to work?
He had to kiss the collective ass of the insurrection causus after 14 FAILED votes for speaker, to finally win a position he has used to accomplish NOTHING, except giving fuckface carlson years worth of sensitive security footage from the capital building to use in a campaign of lies to try to excuse trump's failed insurrection attempt.
He's a pathetic asskissing toady, beholden to people who are going to attempt to use him to destroy democracy, and install themselves as leaders in a white nationalist theocracy...
the truth is a temporary inconvenience. The cadmium-plated high-carbon bullshit many Republicans are saying and doing says so.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
GOP Rep. Nancy Mace says FDA should ignore judge’s decision blocking abortion pill approval
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) on Monday said the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should ignore a Texas federal judge’s ruling blocking its approval of mifepristone, a pill that can be used to induce abortion in early pregnancy.
The South Carolina Republican joined several Democrats who have called for the Biden administration to ignore the judge’s ruling.

“I agree with ignoring it at this point,” Mace said on CNN Monday when asked how the Biden administration should approach the ruling. “There are other lawsuits that are happening right now and other states as well over this issue.”

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk on Friday issued a stay that said the FDA improperly rushed the approval of mifepristone 23 years ago. The ruling would shut down the prescribing and distribution of the drug as soon as seven days after his decision.

But almost concurrently, a federal judge in Washington issued a competing ruling that blocks the FDA from “altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone” in 17 states and Washington, D.C.

The issue could eventually reach the Supreme Court.
Mace joined Democrats Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) who have called for the Biden administration to ignore the Texas ruling.

“President Biden can and must ignore this ruling and keep mifepristone on the market and accessible for every woman in America,” Wyden said in a tweet on Friday.

“The interesting thing when it comes to a ruling is that it relies on enforcement,” Ocasio-Cortez told CNN on Sunday. “And it is up to the Biden administration to enforce, to choose whether or not to enforce a ruling.”

But Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) took a starkly different stance from Mace on Sunday, floating that House Republicans could defund the FDA if the Biden administration refuses to uphold a court ruling.

“If the administration wants to not live up to this ruling, then we’re going to have a problem … it may come to a point where House Republicans on the appropriation side have to defund FDA programs that don’t make sense,” Gonzales said.

Mace, a survivor of sexual assault, has been outspoken against anti-abortion laws and proposals that would not allow exceptions for women who have been raped and warned that the abortion issue is hurting Republicans electorally.

“This is an issue that Republicans have been largely on the wrong side of, we have over the last nine months not shown compassion towards women … The state of South Carolina just a few weeks ago we had some folks in the state legislature that essentially wanted to execute women who had abortions,” Mace said on CNN Monday. “So, we’ve got some extreme views on this issue, but 90 percent of America is somewhere in the middle. And I think that that 90 percent would be okay with listening to the FDA rather than a judge who used an old law that was determined unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.”

Mace appeared to be referring to the Texas judge’s reliance on the Comstock Act, an 1873 “anti-vice” law that aimed to bar the mailing of contraception and anything that could be used for abortion. The law has been narrowed by the courts and Congress since and has not been enforced in decades. Mace also seemingly referenced a 1983 Supreme Court ruling that said a federal regulation prohibiting mailing unsolicited advertisements for contraceptives was unconstitutional.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
GOP Rep. Nancy Mace says FDA should ignore judge’s decision blocking abortion pill approval
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) on Monday said the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should ignore a Texas federal judge’s ruling blocking its approval of mifepristone, a pill that can be used to induce abortion in early pregnancy.
The South Carolina Republican joined several Democrats who have called for the Biden administration to ignore the judge’s ruling.

“I agree with ignoring it at this point,” Mace said on CNN Monday when asked how the Biden administration should approach the ruling. “There are other lawsuits that are happening right now and other states as well over this issue.”

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk on Friday issued a stay that said the FDA improperly rushed the approval of mifepristone 23 years ago. The ruling would shut down the prescribing and distribution of the drug as soon as seven days after his decision.

But almost concurrently, a federal judge in Washington issued a competing ruling that blocks the FDA from “altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone” in 17 states and Washington, D.C.

The issue could eventually reach the Supreme Court.
Mace joined Democrats Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) who have called for the Biden administration to ignore the Texas ruling.

“President Biden can and must ignore this ruling and keep mifepristone on the market and accessible for every woman in America,” Wyden said in a tweet on Friday.

“The interesting thing when it comes to a ruling is that it relies on enforcement,” Ocasio-Cortez told CNN on Sunday. “And it is up to the Biden administration to enforce, to choose whether or not to enforce a ruling.”

But Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) took a starkly different stance from Mace on Sunday, floating that House Republicans could defund the FDA if the Biden administration refuses to uphold a court ruling.

“If the administration wants to not live up to this ruling, then we’re going to have a problem … it may come to a point where House Republicans on the appropriation side have to defund FDA programs that don’t make sense,” Gonzales said.

Mace, a survivor of sexual assault, has been outspoken against anti-abortion laws and proposals that would not allow exceptions for women who have been raped and warned that the abortion issue is hurting Republicans electorally.

“This is an issue that Republicans have been largely on the wrong side of, we have over the last nine months not shown compassion towards women … The state of South Carolina just a few weeks ago we had some folks in the state legislature that essentially wanted to execute women who had abortions,” Mace said on CNN Monday. “So, we’ve got some extreme views on this issue, but 90 percent of America is somewhere in the middle. And I think that that 90 percent would be okay with listening to the FDA rather than a judge who used an old law that was determined unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.”

Mace appeared to be referring to the Texas judge’s reliance on the Comstock Act, an 1873 “anti-vice” law that aimed to bar the mailing of contraception and anything that could be used for abortion. The law has been narrowed by the courts and Congress since and has not been enforced in decades. Mace also seemingly referenced a 1983 Supreme Court ruling that said a federal regulation prohibiting mailing unsolicited advertisements for contraceptives was unconstitutional.
No, let some yokel judge in a Texas back water ban it for the nation! I hear chemotherapy drugs are poison too and mailing out horse dewormer might be made illegal. All ya have to do is shop for an antivaxx judge and they can ban that nationally too! Contraception by mail, forget it!

So, who approves drugs in the USA the FDA or some ignorant fanatical judge in a backwater? Seems if he can ban an approved drug, he can also legalize pot at the stoke of his pen, since his power is greater than the FDA. Maybe the republicans should review all drugs for the approval of uneducated yokels with an axe to grind.
 

Budzbuddha

Well-Known Member
It’s Always Pee …. :bigjoint:
IMG_9590.jpeg



Key is so adamant that the vaccine does harm, in fact, that he drinks his own urine.

That strategy, known on the far right as “looping,” is supposed to cure COVID-19 symptoms. Key has long urged his supporters to follow his lead and collect their morning urine to drink throughout the day. (As noted in a Reuters fact-check, there is “no evidence” that sipping your own urine can magically cure you from a case of coronavirus.)
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
That strategy, known on the far right as “looping,”
They are loopy alright fruit loops... They really need to bring state hospitals back and have those guys in white with butterfly nets, tasers again! I mean J6 looked like they emptied a nuthouse onto the capitol steps, maybe if they had state hospitals, not nearly as many would have shown up!
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

The political quicksand quickens for Republicans over abortion

37,832 views Apr 10, 2023 #Republicans #Abortion #Politics
A federal judge in Texas on Friday suspended the Food and Drug Administration’s longtime approval of the drug mifepristone for use in medication abortions, a ruling that is set to go into effect on April 14 unless a higher court intervenes. Yet the Morning Joe panel discusses how abortion in the U.S. is no longer a 50/50 issue and why it is political quicksand for Republicans.
 

Budzbuddha

Well-Known Member
It’s Always Pee …. :bigjoint:
View attachment 5280232



Key is so adamant that the vaccine does harm, in fact, that he drinks his own urine.

That strategy, known on the far right as “looping,” is supposed to cure COVID-19 symptoms. Key has long urged his supporters to follow his lead and collect their morning urine to drink throughout the day. (As noted in a Reuters fact-check, there is “no evidence” that sipping your own urine can magically cure you from a case of coronavirus.)

Trump loves the PEE

IMG_9591.gif
 

printer

Well-Known Member
DOJ asks appeals court to pause ‘extraordinary’ Texas abortion pill ruling
The Biden administration on Monday afternoon asked an appeals court to put on hold a ruling that could rescind the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to pause U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s ruling from Friday, which found the FDA violated federal standards when it first approved mifepristone 23 years ago, until the administration can bring its appeal of his decision in full.

“Rather than preserving the status quo, as preliminary relief is meant to do, the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA’s approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court’s own misguided assessment of the drug’s safety,” DOJ wrote in court filings.

Kacsmaryk’s ruling gave the administration a weeklong window before it went into effect. The administration is asking the 5th Circuit to extend that pause, and to do so by Thursday at noon, “to enable the government to seek relief in the Supreme Court if necessary.”

“The district court’s extraordinary and unprecedented order should be stayed pending appeal. Plaintiffs lack standing to challenge FDA’s approval of a drug they neither take nor prescribe; their challenge to FDA actions dating back to 2000 is manifestly untimely; and they have provided no basis for second-guessing FDA’s scientific judgment. Those defects foreclose plaintiffs’ claims, and the court flouted fundamental principles of Article III and administrative law in holding otherwise,” the Justice Department wrote.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
DOJ asks appeals court to pause ‘extraordinary’ Texas abortion pill ruling
The Biden administration on Monday afternoon asked an appeals court to put on hold a ruling that could rescind the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to pause U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s ruling from Friday, which found the FDA violated federal standards when it first approved mifepristone 23 years ago, until the administration can bring its appeal of his decision in full.

“Rather than preserving the status quo, as preliminary relief is meant to do, the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA’s approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court’s own misguided assessment of the drug’s safety,” DOJ wrote in court filings.

Kacsmaryk’s ruling gave the administration a weeklong window before it went into effect. The administration is asking the 5th Circuit to extend that pause, and to do so by Thursday at noon, “to enable the government to seek relief in the Supreme Court if necessary.”

“The district court’s extraordinary and unprecedented order should be stayed pending appeal. Plaintiffs lack standing to challenge FDA’s approval of a drug they neither take nor prescribe; their challenge to FDA actions dating back to 2000 is manifestly untimely; and they have provided no basis for second-guessing FDA’s scientific judgment. Those defects foreclose plaintiffs’ claims, and the court flouted fundamental principles of Article III and administrative law in holding otherwise,” the Justice Department wrote.
In 2022, approximately 40 percent of lawyers in the United States were women and over half the voters... Many women are still waking up to this shit and the tide is still rising on it at the polls.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Steve Schmidt explains the MAGA movement’s latest attacks and how to stop it | The Warning

7,532 views Apr 10, 2023
Steve Schmidt reacts to the latest overreaches by the MAGA movement across the United States. He discusses 2 members of the Tennessee House of Representatives being expelled by the majority Republican body, and a far-right judge suspending the Food and Drug Administration’s longtime approval of abortion pill mifepristone.
 
Top