As this litigation shit show proceeds,it's becoming vividly apparent that the writers of the Constitution in their brilliance made assumptions.In the world in which they resided common sense was a given and shame was a deterrent. That a Pres. or former Pres. would overload the legal system as a stall tactic and put forward ludicrous arguments in litigation we are now witnessing has to be beyond their contemplation. It is outrageous that the argument put forth yesterday that a Pres. has complete immunity and could order a US Spec. Ops team to assassinate a political rival.Am I actually hearing this in the USA?With all the serious issues facing our country and the world in general we have a former Pres. presenting 2nd grade arguments in the courts.When the dickhead faced impeachment the R's said it's a criminal court matter/now the dickhead is in criminal court and they say he has to be impeached first,WTF. A pres.(former Pres.) swears to uphold the Constitution not punch holes in it or turn its wording into a bowl of spaghetti. What about duty to protect Americans,not spur them to violence w/BS rhetorical statements.I'm seeing things I'd never thought I'd see and hearing things that I'd never thought I'd hear,we keep going deeper and deeper down this shithole .When is crush depth? All this unnecessary questioning regarding criminal behavior by a Pres.when their is already established precedent. Nixon would have been indicted on criminal charges were it not for Pres. Ford granting a pardon,there is no criminal immunity for a Pres, acting outside the parameters of Presidential duties,and he resigned and technically was not impeached either. Nixon's transgressions don't even register on the richter scale of the former dickhead in chief who is in the pantheon of the vilest,most shameless politicians the country has ever witnessed. A scourge like malady that is only surpassed by his stalwart supporters who's continued tolerance for this shameful,fraudulent con of the century is way beyond baffling.