Stuff that doesn't really fit in either "Examples of" thread....

printer

Well-Known Member
Congressional leaders reach deal to avert government shutdown
Congressional leaders have reached a deal to avert a government shutdown next week, landing on a two-step stopgap bill that will keep the lights on in Washington into March, according to three sources familiar with the proposal.

Under the deal, the new government funding deadlines will be March 1 and March 7. The agreement comes ahead of Friday’s shutdown deadline, and a second deadline on Feb. 2.

Text of the continuing resolution is expected to be posted online Sunday evening, according to a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Republican leadership is scheduled to hold a conference call with members Sunday at 8 p.m., a GOP lawmaker told The Hill, which will likely include a discussion about the plan to avert a government shutdown.

The proposal — which the House and Senate must approve by Friday night to avoid a partial shutdown — will give the House and Senate more time to complete work on the 12 appropriations bills. Congressional leaders announced a deal on top-line spending numbers last weekend, but appropriators need more time to hash out particulars in each funding bill.

The announcement of the two-step continuing resolution is sure to anger conservative House Republicans, who are traditionally opposed to stopgap legislation and have been averse to GOP leadership cutting deals with Democrats.

The two-step approach, however, is one that was largely favored by House conservatives during the shutdown showdown in November. The structure was seen as a way to avoid a massive, whole-of-government omnibus funding bill in December, which Republicans typically abhor.

As an added wrinkle, hardliners have been demanding that border security be included in any government funding effort, pinning the politically prickly topic to the already convoluted shutdown showdown.

Those dynamics mean that the deal will likely require significant Democratic support to get over the finish line in the House.

The backing of another two-step continuing resolution, meanwhile, marks a reversal of sorts for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who vowed in November not to put another stopgap bill on the floor.

“The House Republican Conference is committed to never being in this situation again. I’m done with short-term CRs,” he said during a press conference shortly before the House approved a two-step stopgap bill.

At a Wednesday press conference, however, with the shutdown clock ticking, he said he was “not ruling out anything.”

House Republicans this week had been floating different types of stopgap bills. One option was a long-term continuing resolution, which would have triggered a one percent across-the-board cut, a mechanism included in the debt limit deal then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) struck with President Biden last year.

Johnson asked a group of moderate Republicans if they could support a full-year continuing resolution during a meeting in his office Friday morning, and nearly all lawmakers said no, according to one attendee. He then hinted at a continuing resolution that would last through February or March to buy more time to complete work on all 12 spending bills, the source added.

News of the agreement comes less than one week after Congressional leaders rolled out an agreement for top-line spending numbers, a significant step towards completing the appropriations process through regular order.

The deal sets top-line spending at $1.59 trillion, plus around $69 billion in additional budget tweaks — largely in line with the spending caps included in the debt limit deal then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) struck with Biden last year that outraged Republicans. Johnson has highlighted some tweaks to that agreement, including accelerating clawbacks of IRS mandatory funding and additional clawbacks of unspent pandemic funds.

Conservative House Republicans came out against the deal, urging Johnson to craft a different plan that included deeper spending cuts. On Friday, however, the Speaker said the agreement “remains” in place.

But even as Johnson stuck by the deal, House Freedom Caucus Chairman Bob Good (R-Va.) insisted that he believed Johnson was still “legitimately considering alternatives.”

So no Ukraine until after?
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Congressional leaders reach deal to avert government shutdown
Congressional leaders have reached a deal to avert a government shutdown next week, landing on a two-step stopgap bill that will keep the lights on in Washington into March, according to three sources familiar with the proposal.

Under the deal, the new government funding deadlines will be March 1 and March 7. The agreement comes ahead of Friday’s shutdown deadline, and a second deadline on Feb. 2.

Text of the continuing resolution is expected to be posted online Sunday evening, according to a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Republican leadership is scheduled to hold a conference call with members Sunday at 8 p.m., a GOP lawmaker told The Hill, which will likely include a discussion about the plan to avert a government shutdown.

The proposal — which the House and Senate must approve by Friday night to avoid a partial shutdown — will give the House and Senate more time to complete work on the 12 appropriations bills. Congressional leaders announced a deal on top-line spending numbers last weekend, but appropriators need more time to hash out particulars in each funding bill.

The announcement of the two-step continuing resolution is sure to anger conservative House Republicans, who are traditionally opposed to stopgap legislation and have been averse to GOP leadership cutting deals with Democrats.

The two-step approach, however, is one that was largely favored by House conservatives during the shutdown showdown in November. The structure was seen as a way to avoid a massive, whole-of-government omnibus funding bill in December, which Republicans typically abhor.

As an added wrinkle, hardliners have been demanding that border security be included in any government funding effort, pinning the politically prickly topic to the already convoluted shutdown showdown.

Those dynamics mean that the deal will likely require significant Democratic support to get over the finish line in the House.

The backing of another two-step continuing resolution, meanwhile, marks a reversal of sorts for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who vowed in November not to put another stopgap bill on the floor.

“The House Republican Conference is committed to never being in this situation again. I’m done with short-term CRs,” he said during a press conference shortly before the House approved a two-step stopgap bill.

At a Wednesday press conference, however, with the shutdown clock ticking, he said he was “not ruling out anything.”

House Republicans this week had been floating different types of stopgap bills. One option was a long-term continuing resolution, which would have triggered a one percent across-the-board cut, a mechanism included in the debt limit deal then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) struck with President Biden last year.

Johnson asked a group of moderate Republicans if they could support a full-year continuing resolution during a meeting in his office Friday morning, and nearly all lawmakers said no, according to one attendee. He then hinted at a continuing resolution that would last through February or March to buy more time to complete work on all 12 spending bills, the source added.

News of the agreement comes less than one week after Congressional leaders rolled out an agreement for top-line spending numbers, a significant step towards completing the appropriations process through regular order.

The deal sets top-line spending at $1.59 trillion, plus around $69 billion in additional budget tweaks — largely in line with the spending caps included in the debt limit deal then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) struck with Biden last year that outraged Republicans. Johnson has highlighted some tweaks to that agreement, including accelerating clawbacks of IRS mandatory funding and additional clawbacks of unspent pandemic funds.

Conservative House Republicans came out against the deal, urging Johnson to craft a different plan that included deeper spending cuts. On Friday, however, the Speaker said the agreement “remains” in place.

But even as Johnson stuck by the deal, House Freedom Caucus Chairman Bob Good (R-Va.) insisted that he believed Johnson was still “legitimately considering alternatives.”

So no Ukraine until after?
They will get to it, if Johnson cut a deal for it for later, he wouldn't say anything until he spang it on the magats. Joe, the democrats and Mitch among others want this so bad they can taste it and will insist, or they will take the Russian money, whatever comes first.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Mike Lindell claims Fox News ‘canceled’ MyPillow
Election denier and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is claiming that Fox News stopped running his company’s commercials on the network, asserting that he was “canceled” in an effort to silence him, a claim that Fox denies.

Lindell went public on Friday, sharing a video on X, formerly known as Twitter, where apart from pleading for monetary support in a time of “cancelation,” he suspected that the network is “getting rid” of “his voice.”

In the Friday video, Lindell speculated that Fox is silencing him because his online platform TV/FrankSpeech online channel hired former Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, who recently interviewed former President Trump. Dobbs’s show was canceled three years ago. The MyPillow CEO also quipped it is because he wants to “our election platforms,” something that Fox also denies.

Fox disputes Lindell’s claims, saying that the removal of the ads was due to financial issues. “As soon as their account is paid, we would be happy to accept their advertising,” Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti told the Associated Press.

Lindell admitted that he owes $7.7 million to Fox and that, on average, he spent $1 million a week to run his ads on the network.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Mike Lindell claims Fox News ‘canceled’ MyPillow
Election denier and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is claiming that Fox News stopped running his company’s commercials on the network, asserting that he was “canceled” in an effort to silence him, a claim that Fox denies.

Lindell went public on Friday, sharing a video on X, formerly known as Twitter, where apart from pleading for monetary support in a time of “cancelation,” he suspected that the network is “getting rid” of “his voice.”

In the Friday video, Lindell speculated that Fox is silencing him because his online platform TV/FrankSpeech online channel hired former Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, who recently interviewed former President Trump. Dobbs’s show was canceled three years ago. The MyPillow CEO also quipped it is because he wants to “our election platforms,” something that Fox also denies.

Fox disputes Lindell’s claims, saying that the removal of the ads was due to financial issues. “As soon as their account is paid, we would be happy to accept their advertising,” Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti told the Associated Press.

Lindell admitted that he owes $7.7 million to Fox and that, on average, he spent $1 million a week to run his ads on the network.
They’re stiffing me! Yeah I’ve been stiffing them for years, but this is different! It’s so unfair!
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Mike Lindell claims Fox News ‘canceled’ MyPillow
Election denier and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is claiming that Fox News stopped running his company’s commercials on the network, asserting that he was “canceled” in an effort to silence him, a claim that Fox denies.

Lindell went public on Friday, sharing a video on X, formerly known as Twitter, where apart from pleading for monetary support in a time of “cancelation,” he suspected that the network is “getting rid” of “his voice.”

In the Friday video, Lindell speculated that Fox is silencing him because his online platform TV/FrankSpeech online channel hired former Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, who recently interviewed former President Trump. Dobbs’s show was canceled three years ago. The MyPillow CEO also quipped it is because he wants to “our election platforms,” something that Fox also denies.

Fox disputes Lindell’s claims, saying that the removal of the ads was due to financial issues. “As soon as their account is paid, we would be happy to accept their advertising,” Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti told the Associated Press.

Lindell admitted that he owes $7.7 million to Fox and that, on average, he spent $1 million a week to run his ads on the network.
Fuck you Mike Lindell.

Fucking parasite huckster who sells crap by calling it shinola to people who don't know the difference. The grandiose SOB had the nerve but also the stupidity to participate in a plot to overthrow our government with other stupid people. I'm sure Trump only let him in on the plot because Lindell was a lesser huckster who Trump could exploit. So Lindell cries foul now that Fox refused to let him leech off of them. He left them holding an $8 M unpaid bill and the huckster claims he was wronged. He'll go off into the right wing media sphere claiming he was wronged and therefore Fox has no right to the money they say he owed. These people have no shame.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
They will get to it, if Johnson cut a deal for it for later, he wouldn't say anything until he spang it on the magats. Joe, the democrats and Mitch among others want this so bad they can taste it and will insist, or they will take the Russian money, whatever comes first.
No mention of Ukraine in that article. The border, military support for Ukraine and for Israel are all part of a standoff that each side can maintain for a while.

1705266800477.png

I toad you so.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
If Johnson double crosses the magats on the budget (as in any budget), he will need democratic support to stay in power and they have him by the balls on Ukraine, the magats run the committees and he has them by the balls with their assignments. He might make the magats irrelevant, we will soon see.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
If Johnson double crosses the magats on the budget (as in any budget), he will need democratic support to stay in power and they have him by the balls on Ukraine, the magats run the committees and he has them by the balls with their assignments. He might make the magats irrelevant, we will soon see.
There is no distinction between the treason caucus and Johnson except he’s slicker.

Never forget he is a stone-cold Seven Mountains dominionist. Same fascism; exciting new flavor!


Conclusion/excerpt. Emphases mine.

The [Seven] Mountain mandate is a hyperfocus on Christian dominion theology that does not seem to have the centrality of Christ’s atoning sacrifice as a central theme. In all of my research in it so far, making disciples of unbelievers is not the central issue. Instead, it’s taking dominion. This concerns me since it could be a strategy used by the devil to take the focus off of Christ and put it on Christian work in the battle to dominate the world. In this, we need to be very careful.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
There is no distinction between the treason caucus and Johnson except he’s slicker.

Never forget he is a stone-cold Seven Mountains dominionist. Same fascism; exciting new flavor!


Conclusion/excerpt. Emphases mine.

The [Seven] Mountain mandate is a hyperfocus on Christian dominion theology that does not seem to have the centrality of Christ’s atoning sacrifice as a central theme. In all of my research in it so far, making disciples of unbelievers is not the central issue. Instead, it’s taking dominion. This concerns me since it could be a strategy used by the devil to take the focus off of Christ and put it on Christian work in the battle to dominate the world. In this, we need to be very careful.
Look at it like two enemies in a spaghetti western with zero trust, but who are locked in an embrace with a knife at each other's throat...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
There is no distinction between the treason caucus and Johnson except he’s slicker.

Never forget he is a stone-cold Seven Mountains dominionist. Same fascism; exciting new flavor!


Conclusion/excerpt. Emphases mine.

The [Seven] Mountain mandate is a hyperfocus on Christian dominion theology that does not seem to have the centrality of Christ’s atoning sacrifice as a central theme. In all of my research in it so far, making disciples of unbelievers is not the central issue. Instead, it’s taking dominion. This concerns me since it could be a strategy used by the devil to take the focus off of Christ and put it on Christian work in the battle to dominate the world. In this, we need to be very careful.
I can see Joe having a meeting with Johnson in the oval office:
Joe: "I'm thinking of honoring a couple of your members with federal responsibilities as a demonstration of bi-partisanship"!

"I'd also really like to get that Ukrainian aid and we can do deal on the border"... Now the decision on those appointments is still pending upon a report I'm waiting for..."
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
That makes no sense to me. Treasoners and Mikey are not opponents.
He is a fucking grifter and this means power, the only sniff of it he is likely to get, he might be a religious lunatic, but that does not mean he isn't a grifter as well. Earthly power means more to this guy than an eternity in heaven, you will know them by their actions, not by what they say.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
The ten unhealthiest states in the US all went for Trump. in 2020 by a large margin.


A new study has identified the region with the unhealthiest population in America.
Forbes Advisor conducted the analysis and ranked each state based on several factors, including rates of drug abuse, unhealthy lifestyle habits, and chronic disease.

  1. West Virginia
  2. Mississippi
  3. Tennessee
  4. Arkansas
  5. Kentucky
  6. Alabama
  7. Louisiana
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Ohio
  10. Indiana
Hawaii, one of the most beautiful states in the U.S., has the best health profile.

Every one of them are home to MAGA majorities.


This isn't entirely bad news.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
He is a fucking grifter and this means power, the only sniff of it he is likely to get, he might be a religious lunatic, but that does not mean he isn't a grifter as well. Earthly power means more to this guy than an eternity in heaven, you will know them by their actions, not by what they say.
"He might not be a religious lunatic" is hardly a threshold at which one begins an argument regarding how a leader would make compromises and tradeoffs.


I just thought I'd point that out to you.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
"He might not be a religious lunatic" is hardly a threshold at which one begins an argument regarding how a leader would make compromises and tradeoffs.


I just thought I'd point that out to you.
I was pointing out his motivation, power is a drug and if he wants to stay on top of his dung heap...
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Virginia county finds 4,000 misreported 2020 votes, shorting Biden
Election officials in Virginia’s Prince William County have acknowledged roughly 4,000 votes were misreported in former President Trump’s favor during the 2020 presidential election, when President Joe Biden went on to win the state.

A release from the county’s Office of Elections announced Trump incorrectly received 2,327 extra votes, while Biden was shorted 1,648 votes.

The U.S. Senate candidates for the state in both parties received too few votes, and a Republican House candidate who won his race was shorted just less than 300 votes.

“The reporting errors were presumably a consequence of the results tapes not being programmed to a format that was compatible with state reporting requirements. Attempts to correct this issue appear to have created errors,” said Eric Olsen, director of elections for the county.

The errors “did not consistently favor one party or candidate but were likely due to a lack of proper planning, a difficult election environment, and human error,” Olsen added.

Biden ultimately won Virginia by more than 450,000 votes, and the misreporting issues did not meet the 1 percent threshold to trigger a recount, according to the Prince William County office.

The insights about the misreported figures stem from a case involving the county’s former registrar, Michele White, who was charged in 2022 with corrupt conduct, making a false statement and neglect of duty relating to the 2020 election. Those charges have since been dropped, the Associated Press reports.

Olsen, in his statement, stressed that Virginians should have faith in the state’s election systems, and spotlighted that improvements have been made to correct the process for future contests.

“Mistakes are unfortunate but require diligence and innovation to correct. They do not reflect a purposeful attempt to undermine the integrity of the electoral process and the investigation into this matter ended with that conclusion.”
 

topcat

Well-Known Member
The ten unhealthiest states in the US all went for Trump. in 2020 by a large margin.


A new study has identified the region with the unhealthiest population in America.
Forbes Advisor conducted the analysis and ranked each state based on several factors, including rates of drug abuse, unhealthy lifestyle habits, and chronic disease.

  1. West Virginia
  2. Mississippi
  3. Tennessee
  4. Arkansas
  5. Kentucky
  6. Alabama
  7. Louisiana
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Ohio
  10. Indiana
Hawaii, one of the most beautiful states in the U.S., has the best health profile.

Every one of them are home to MAGA majorities.


This isn't entirely bad news.
Where gravy is considered a vegetable.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Republicans pause Hunter Biden contempt push amid new talks for testimony
House Republicans are putting plans to hold Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress for defying congressional subpoenas on hold amid new negotiations to bring in the president’s son for questioning.

The House Rules Committee was scheduled to consider contempt resolutions from the House Oversight and Judiciary committees Tuesday afternoon, setting up a vote for later in the week.

But those resolutions were removed from the schedule amid the new talks, which come after Hunter Biden’s attorney said last week he would agree to give testimony if Republicans issued new subpoenas; Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) and Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) then responded over the weekend that they would do so.

“Following an exchange of letters between the parties on January 12 and January 14, staff for the committees and lawyers for Hunter Biden are working to schedule Hunter Biden’s appearance,” a House Oversight Committee spokesperson said in a statement Tuesday afternoon.

“Negotiations are ongoing this afternoon, and in conjunction with the disruption to member travel and canceling votes, the House Rules Committee isn’t considering the contempt resolution today to give the attorneys additional time to reach an agreement,” the Oversight spokesperson said.

A spokesperson for Jordan had previously indicated that the plan to hold Hunter Biden in contempt could change depending on developments in new talks.

“If they agree to genuinely cooperate and we can work out a deposition date, the Chairman will recommend to Leadership that we hold the floor vote on contempt in abeyance for now,” the Jordan spokesperson said Monday.

House Rules Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.), though, indicated that moving on on the contempt resolutions was not completely off the table.

“Should those conversations not prove successful, the Rules Committee may reconvene this week to consider those reports,” Cole said in the hearing Tuesday.

Republicans have long probed Hunter Biden’s overseas businesses and the Department of Justice’s handling of a tax crimes investigation into him, searching for any improper connections to his father, President Biden. Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) declared those investigations to be under the umbrella of an impeachment inquiry in September, and the House formally voted to approve the impeachment inquiry in December.

Hunter Biden defied GOP subpoenas from the Oversight and Judiciary panels in December, saying that he would appear in a public hearing format but not for a closed-door deposition out of concern that the Republicans would misrepresent his testimony. Instead of appearing for the hearing, he gave a statement to the press on the Senate lawn asserting that his father was never financially involved with his business.

But Republicans said a public format, with rounds of questioning cycling between members on the panel, was insufficient for poring over reams of financial documents. They offered a public hearing at a later date, and to release the transcript of the deposition. The Republican leaders noted that initial closed-door testimony is standard for such inquiries.

When the panels moved to hold Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress last week, Hunter Biden made a surprise appearance in the House Oversight Committee, in order to make a point about his willingness to testify publicly.

Abbe Lowell, Hunter Biden’s attorney, later argued that the initial subpoenas were invalid because they were issued before the House had voted to authorize an impeachment inquiry.

“If you issue a new proper subpoena, now that there is a duly authorized impeachment inquiry, Mr. Biden will comply for a hearing or deposition,” Lowell wrote — and floated a “public deposition/hearing with alternating rounds of questions” in a footnote.

In a Sunday response letter, Jordan and Comer defended the legality of their original subpoenas but said they “are prepared to issue subpoenas compelling Mr. Biden’s appearance at a deposition on a new date in the coming weeks” — and in a footnote rejected the idea of a public “hybrid process” deposition that Lowell had floated.
 
Top