topcat
Well-Known Member
I was wondering what happened to that Overstock guy.
Legal woes of That Man’s associates
- Thread starter cannabineer
- Start date
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
We shouldn’t discount him.
printer
Well-Known Member
Judge rules John Eastman should be disbarred over efforts to overturn 2020 election
A California judge recommended disbarring a lawyer at the center of former President Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election on Wednesday.
State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland found John Eastman culpable on 10 of the 11 counts filed by the California State Bar last year. The state bar sought to strip Eastman’s license to practice law in the state over “false and misleading statements” about purported election fraud and his role in “provoking” the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
“It is recommended that John Charles Eastman, State Bar Number 193726, be disbarred from the practice of law in California and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys,” Roland wrote.
Eastman can appeal Wednesday’s ruling, and the case could ultimately end up before the California Supreme Court.
Roland’s ruling follows a trial last year that lasted more than 30 days, at which Eastman himself testified. Just before the proceedings concluded in November, the judge found Eastman preliminarily culpable. Roland was appointed by Tony Atkins, a Democrat who at the time was Speaker of the California State Assembly.
Eastman spearheaded the legal strategy attempting to subvert the election results in several key 2020 states, including by using slates of alternate electors to swing the election’s outcome in Trump’s favor. The plan also relied on former Vice President Mike Pence throwing out the real electors for the “fake” ones, with Eastman writing memos that spurred the pressure campaign on Pence.
Eastman described the disbarment proceedings as “Orwellian,” insisting he was fulfilling his ethical duty to zealously represent Trump’s interests and that had a First Amendment right to make his public statements at Trump’s Jan. 6 rally and elsewhere.
“This is authoritarianism, not republicanism,” Eastman’s lawyers wrote in court papers following the trial.
“And Dr. Eastman, in fulfilling his duties to a client, happens to have been thrust to the forefront of the push-back against such authoritarianism, at great expense both in time and treasure to himself,” they continued. “If Dr. Eastman and his client were correct that the 2020 election was stolen – a view they firmly held at the time and continue to hold – then the threat to our system of government is extraordinarily high.”
The state bar insisted that Eastman was fabricating “an illusion of legality to an illegal effort,” demanding he be disbarred.
“His misconduct, committed in the course and scope of his representation of former President Trump, shocked the conscience of the nation, and is of such exceptional gravity that only disbarment will suffice. To protect both the public and the integrity of our legal system, disbarment is compelled,” they wrote in court filings.
Eastman also faces criminal charges alongside Trump in Georgia, where they and more than a dozen other Trump allies are accused of attempting to overturn the state’s 2020 election results. Eastman has pleaded not guilty to the eight counts he faces.
Several other lawyers connected to Trump’s 2020 campaign have also faced repercussions for their false claims of election fraud and efforts to swing the election in the former president’s favor.
Longtime Trump ally Rudy Giuliani had his New York law license suspended in 2021, and a D.C. bar association disciplinary panel said in June his license there should be revoked. Ex-Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis was publicly censured in Colorado for her false statements tied to the election, and lawyer Lin Wood retired after the State Bar of Georgia said it would not pursue disciplinary proceedings against him should he do so.
A disciplinary trial for lawyer Jeffrey Clark, an ex-Justice Department official who helped Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, is also underway. The D.C. Bar’s Board of Professional Responsibility is attempting to strip his law license for using “the authority of the Department of Justice to overturn the election, based on a lie.”
Eastman also holds a law license in Washington, D.C.
thehill.com
A California judge recommended disbarring a lawyer at the center of former President Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election on Wednesday.
State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland found John Eastman culpable on 10 of the 11 counts filed by the California State Bar last year. The state bar sought to strip Eastman’s license to practice law in the state over “false and misleading statements” about purported election fraud and his role in “provoking” the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
“It is recommended that John Charles Eastman, State Bar Number 193726, be disbarred from the practice of law in California and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys,” Roland wrote.
Eastman can appeal Wednesday’s ruling, and the case could ultimately end up before the California Supreme Court.
Roland’s ruling follows a trial last year that lasted more than 30 days, at which Eastman himself testified. Just before the proceedings concluded in November, the judge found Eastman preliminarily culpable. Roland was appointed by Tony Atkins, a Democrat who at the time was Speaker of the California State Assembly.
Eastman spearheaded the legal strategy attempting to subvert the election results in several key 2020 states, including by using slates of alternate electors to swing the election’s outcome in Trump’s favor. The plan also relied on former Vice President Mike Pence throwing out the real electors for the “fake” ones, with Eastman writing memos that spurred the pressure campaign on Pence.
Eastman described the disbarment proceedings as “Orwellian,” insisting he was fulfilling his ethical duty to zealously represent Trump’s interests and that had a First Amendment right to make his public statements at Trump’s Jan. 6 rally and elsewhere.
“This is authoritarianism, not republicanism,” Eastman’s lawyers wrote in court papers following the trial.
“And Dr. Eastman, in fulfilling his duties to a client, happens to have been thrust to the forefront of the push-back against such authoritarianism, at great expense both in time and treasure to himself,” they continued. “If Dr. Eastman and his client were correct that the 2020 election was stolen – a view they firmly held at the time and continue to hold – then the threat to our system of government is extraordinarily high.”
The state bar insisted that Eastman was fabricating “an illusion of legality to an illegal effort,” demanding he be disbarred.
“His misconduct, committed in the course and scope of his representation of former President Trump, shocked the conscience of the nation, and is of such exceptional gravity that only disbarment will suffice. To protect both the public and the integrity of our legal system, disbarment is compelled,” they wrote in court filings.
Eastman also faces criminal charges alongside Trump in Georgia, where they and more than a dozen other Trump allies are accused of attempting to overturn the state’s 2020 election results. Eastman has pleaded not guilty to the eight counts he faces.
Several other lawyers connected to Trump’s 2020 campaign have also faced repercussions for their false claims of election fraud and efforts to swing the election in the former president’s favor.
Longtime Trump ally Rudy Giuliani had his New York law license suspended in 2021, and a D.C. bar association disciplinary panel said in June his license there should be revoked. Ex-Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis was publicly censured in Colorado for her false statements tied to the election, and lawyer Lin Wood retired after the State Bar of Georgia said it would not pursue disciplinary proceedings against him should he do so.
A disciplinary trial for lawyer Jeffrey Clark, an ex-Justice Department official who helped Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, is also underway. The D.C. Bar’s Board of Professional Responsibility is attempting to strip his law license for using “the authority of the Department of Justice to overturn the election, based on a lie.”
Eastman also holds a law license in Washington, D.C.
Judge rules John Eastman should be disbarred over efforts to overturn 2020 election
A California judge on Wednesday recommended disbarring a lawyer at the center of former President Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. State Bar Judge Yvette Roland found …
thehill.com
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Guess who got subpoenas in Arizona.........
Nugnewbie
Well-Known Member
Big donation to Rudy Giuliani defense fund is target of lawsuit alleging fraud by donor
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani is fighting several court cases related to his work as a lawyer for Donald Trump.
printer
Well-Known Member
Giuliani loses bid to dismiss $148 million defamation judgment
Rudy Giuliani lost his appeal Monday to dismiss the $148 million verdict handed to him last year in a defamation lawsuit brought by two former Georgia election workers.
Giuliani filed for bankruptcy days after a Washington, D.C., jury ordered him to pay $148 million to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss in a defamation trial in December. He had baselessly accused the two former election workers of committing fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell rejected Giuliani’s motion in an order Monday, explaining that Giuliani did not provide enough evidence as to why his verdict should be tossed or why he should be given a new trial.
“Giuliani’s renewed motion urging this Court to reverse its prior findings and rulings and to override the jury’s considered verdict on the basis of five threadbare arguments falls well short of persuading that “the evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom are so one-sided that reasonable men and women could not have reached a verdict in [plaintiffs’] favor.”
Giuliani appealed the verdict after his bankruptcy judge allowed him to do so in February.
Attorneys for Giuliani had renewed his motion for judgment as a matter of law in February to the judge who oversaw the trial. His legal team said in court filings that the statements in question were protected under the First Amendment and insisted that they were not made with actual malice.
He was found liable for the case months before the jury convened. The jury only needed to decide how much the former New York City mayor needed to pay in damages.
thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4595911-giuliani-loses-bid-to-dismiss-148-million-defamation-judgment/
Rudy Giuliani lost his appeal Monday to dismiss the $148 million verdict handed to him last year in a defamation lawsuit brought by two former Georgia election workers.
Giuliani filed for bankruptcy days after a Washington, D.C., jury ordered him to pay $148 million to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss in a defamation trial in December. He had baselessly accused the two former election workers of committing fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell rejected Giuliani’s motion in an order Monday, explaining that Giuliani did not provide enough evidence as to why his verdict should be tossed or why he should be given a new trial.
“Giuliani’s renewed motion urging this Court to reverse its prior findings and rulings and to override the jury’s considered verdict on the basis of five threadbare arguments falls well short of persuading that “the evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom are so one-sided that reasonable men and women could not have reached a verdict in [plaintiffs’] favor.”
Giuliani appealed the verdict after his bankruptcy judge allowed him to do so in February.
Attorneys for Giuliani had renewed his motion for judgment as a matter of law in February to the judge who oversaw the trial. His legal team said in court filings that the statements in question were protected under the First Amendment and insisted that they were not made with actual malice.
He was found liable for the case months before the jury convened. The jury only needed to decide how much the former New York City mayor needed to pay in damages.
thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4595911-giuliani-loses-bid-to-dismiss-148-million-defamation-judgment/
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Trump Media tells shareholders how to block their DJT stock being loaned to short sellers
The price of DJT has sharply fallen in recent weeks, cutting billions of dollars in value from Trump Media shares held by Donald Trump and others.
printer
Well-Known Member
Giuliani, Meadows charged in Arizona ‘fake elector’ indictment
An Arizona grand jury handed up felony charges against Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows and other prominent Trump allies for allegedly attempting to prevent the lawful transfer of power from then-President Trump to Joe Biden.
Seven Trump aides were charged alongside 11 pro-Trump Arizona Republicans who signed documents purporting to be the state’s valid electors in 2020.
The former president himself is not charged but is listed as an unindicted co-conspirator.
Prosecutors accuse the 18 defendants of devising a scheme to raise false claims of election fraud to pressure Arizona election officials to overturn Biden’s narrow victory in the state.
The indictment describes lawsuits filed, alleged messages to county and state officials and the signing of the “fake elector” documents in December 2020.
Each of the 11 pro-Trump electors faces nine charges, including conspiracy, fraud and forgery counts.
“In Arizona, and the United States, the people elected Joseph Biden as President on November 3, 2020,” the indictment reads.
“Unwilling to accept this fact, Defendants and unindicted coconspirators schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency to keep Unindicted Coconspirator 1 in office against the will of Arizona’s voters,” it continued, referring to Trump. “This scheme would have deprived Arizona voters of their right to vote and have their votes counted.”
Only the 11 alternate electors are identified by name, but descriptions contained within the charging documents make clear the other defendants include Giuliani, the former New York City mayor turned Trump attorney; Meadows, Trump’s White House chief of staff; Boris Epshteyn, a longtime Trump adviser; John Eastman, an attorney involved in Trump’s efforts to overturn the election; and Christina Bobb, another Trump attorney who now works for the Republican National Committee.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’s (D) office said their names will be made public after they have been served.
The 2020 presidential race in Arizona was one of the nation’s tightest, with Biden prevailing against Trump by just more than 10,000 votes.
Arizona was one of seven battleground states where slates of “alternate electors” convened and claimed without basis that they were “duly elected” electors. The hope was that then-Vice President Mike Pence would recognize those Trump-supporting electors instead of the true electoral votes cast for Biden.
Without naming him, the indictment asserts that Giuliani — often identified as “the Mayor” — spread false claims of election fraud in Arizona. He pressured Arizona officials to change the outcome of the state’s election, and was responsible for encouraging the pro-Trump electors to vote for the former president’s ticket, according to the indictment.
Former Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers (R ) implicated Giuliani in his 2022 testimony before the House Jan. 6 committee. Bowers said that, despite repeatedly pushing the New York mayor-turned-Trump-surrogate for proof to back up his 2020 election fraud claims, Giuliani failed to produce any.
“My recollection, [Giuliani] said, ‘We’ve got lots of theories, we just don’t have the evidence,’” Bowers testified.
Meadows, also unnamed in the indictment, allegedly worked with members of Trump’s campaign to “coordinate and implement” the alternate electors’ votes in the battleground states, and was involved in “many efforts to keep Unindicted Coconspirator 1 (Trump) in power despite his defeat at the polls,” the charging document reads.
The other Trump allies allegedly helped implement the scheme, including by pressuring Pence to accept the pro-Trump slate of electors, according to the indictment.
The so-called ‘fake electors’ indicted are former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward; her husband, Michael Ward; Tyler Bowyer, the chief operating officer of Turning Point Action; Nancy Cottle, who has held positions on the Maricopa County Republican Committee; Arizona State Sen. Jacob Hoffman; Arizona State Sen. Anthony Kern; former U.S. Senate candidate James Lamon; former Cochise County Republican Party Chair Robert Montgomery; Samuel Moorhead, a former Gila County Republican Party precinct committeeman; former Ahwatukee Republican Women president Lorraine Pellegrino; and Gregory Safsted, the state Republican party’s former executive director.
Pro-Trump electors in Michigan, Nevada and Georgia have also faced charges for attempting to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential election.
thehill.com
An Arizona grand jury handed up felony charges against Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows and other prominent Trump allies for allegedly attempting to prevent the lawful transfer of power from then-President Trump to Joe Biden.
Seven Trump aides were charged alongside 11 pro-Trump Arizona Republicans who signed documents purporting to be the state’s valid electors in 2020.
The former president himself is not charged but is listed as an unindicted co-conspirator.
Prosecutors accuse the 18 defendants of devising a scheme to raise false claims of election fraud to pressure Arizona election officials to overturn Biden’s narrow victory in the state.
The indictment describes lawsuits filed, alleged messages to county and state officials and the signing of the “fake elector” documents in December 2020.
Each of the 11 pro-Trump electors faces nine charges, including conspiracy, fraud and forgery counts.
“In Arizona, and the United States, the people elected Joseph Biden as President on November 3, 2020,” the indictment reads.
“Unwilling to accept this fact, Defendants and unindicted coconspirators schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency to keep Unindicted Coconspirator 1 in office against the will of Arizona’s voters,” it continued, referring to Trump. “This scheme would have deprived Arizona voters of their right to vote and have their votes counted.”
Only the 11 alternate electors are identified by name, but descriptions contained within the charging documents make clear the other defendants include Giuliani, the former New York City mayor turned Trump attorney; Meadows, Trump’s White House chief of staff; Boris Epshteyn, a longtime Trump adviser; John Eastman, an attorney involved in Trump’s efforts to overturn the election; and Christina Bobb, another Trump attorney who now works for the Republican National Committee.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’s (D) office said their names will be made public after they have been served.
The 2020 presidential race in Arizona was one of the nation’s tightest, with Biden prevailing against Trump by just more than 10,000 votes.
Arizona was one of seven battleground states where slates of “alternate electors” convened and claimed without basis that they were “duly elected” electors. The hope was that then-Vice President Mike Pence would recognize those Trump-supporting electors instead of the true electoral votes cast for Biden.
Without naming him, the indictment asserts that Giuliani — often identified as “the Mayor” — spread false claims of election fraud in Arizona. He pressured Arizona officials to change the outcome of the state’s election, and was responsible for encouraging the pro-Trump electors to vote for the former president’s ticket, according to the indictment.
Former Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers (R ) implicated Giuliani in his 2022 testimony before the House Jan. 6 committee. Bowers said that, despite repeatedly pushing the New York mayor-turned-Trump-surrogate for proof to back up his 2020 election fraud claims, Giuliani failed to produce any.
“My recollection, [Giuliani] said, ‘We’ve got lots of theories, we just don’t have the evidence,’” Bowers testified.
Meadows, also unnamed in the indictment, allegedly worked with members of Trump’s campaign to “coordinate and implement” the alternate electors’ votes in the battleground states, and was involved in “many efforts to keep Unindicted Coconspirator 1 (Trump) in power despite his defeat at the polls,” the charging document reads.
The other Trump allies allegedly helped implement the scheme, including by pressuring Pence to accept the pro-Trump slate of electors, according to the indictment.
The so-called ‘fake electors’ indicted are former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward; her husband, Michael Ward; Tyler Bowyer, the chief operating officer of Turning Point Action; Nancy Cottle, who has held positions on the Maricopa County Republican Committee; Arizona State Sen. Jacob Hoffman; Arizona State Sen. Anthony Kern; former U.S. Senate candidate James Lamon; former Cochise County Republican Party Chair Robert Montgomery; Samuel Moorhead, a former Gila County Republican Party precinct committeeman; former Ahwatukee Republican Women president Lorraine Pellegrino; and Gregory Safsted, the state Republican party’s former executive director.
Pro-Trump electors in Michigan, Nevada and Georgia have also faced charges for attempting to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Giuliani, Meadows charged in Arizona ‘fake elector’ indictment
An Arizona grand jury handed up felony charges against Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows and other prominent Trump allies for allegedly attempting to prevent the lawful transfer of power from then-Presid…
thehill.com
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Oh Bannon...time to get off you newsmax pod cast...and visit a nice little 4x8 cell for about 4 months......ta taaaa
and don't worry your other buddy, he's already there....maybe you can have a nice conversation in your new duds....orange looks great on ya btw
and don't worry your other buddy, he's already there....maybe you can have a nice conversation in your new duds....orange looks great on ya btw
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
He will appeal to the SCOTUS and delay justice once again. He's going to lose this appeal too. Maybe he's hoping for a pardon from Trump (again). How humiliating, to scrape and kneel before a convicted sexual abuser, rapist and financial fraudster (at the very least).
This person's adivce: "Just do it".
Prison Is Challenging
In the final analysis, this is the situation. It is no picnic, and it takes work on many fronts to get through it, but I am living proof of this, 29 or 36, or even 54 months is not forever. You can make it through, come home, and restart your life. The system is flawed, and many men serve time who would have been as well served to pay a fine and time on probation.
Again, this is a common-sense approach to an obvious problem of lack of funds and overcrowding, but let's have none of that! This is a government agency, after all. To dwell on what might have been will serve no purpose. Take the Nike approach, "Just do it," and it will be over sooner than you think—I can promise you that.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
yeah Cannon will try the SCOTUS route to keep him out, just like Navarro did, but even SCOTUS shot down Navarro....and he's sitting in jail right now.......
i have to agree with that persons advice......."just do it" get it over with....
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Perhaps; we will see.
N. b. no leading Democrats are wasting taxpayer money attending or even complaining about his trial. Meanwhile in the Big Apple …
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Wrong thread. Maybe you are trying to make a point if so, think again. Democrats have enough legal corruption to clean up, though nothing like Republicans, who through illegal corruption are attempting to expand the limits of what is considered acceptable, even if it is illegal. The detail that renders the Menendez situation impossible to equate with Trump and his band of attorney-Wrenfields' woes is: Democrats are not circling the wagons around Menendez.
If you want to discuss Menendez's travails, there is a thread for that.
This deserves to be given more attention. Damian Williams, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York who reports to Merrick Garland has indicted a high ranking Democratic Party Senator on corruption charges. I'm sure that the Republican base are hooting about this because somebody in the other tribe was charged. Though maybe Republican leaders aren't so happy about this. Because the message I'm getting is that the DOJ will investigate corrupt officials without bias or consideration of the power they wield in Congress. The Republican Party suffers from the same problem every authoritarian political establishment suffers from. Trump's administration was so corrupt that in order to get ahead, its leaders had to commit corrupt acts just to maintain their campaign war chests and influence others. They should be afraid. Very afraid.
Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez Indicted On Bribery Charges — Again
The New Jersey senator and his wife were indicted in New York for allegedly accepting bribes from an Egyptian American businessman in exchange for official acts.www.huffpost.com
Meanwhile, Biden's administration keeps its distance from the DOJ and his appointee helps Democrats by rooting out corruption among their own ranks.
Last edited:
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Almost Cali disbarred Eastman pleads not guilty in Arizona (insert giggle here)
Meanwhile Arizona is trying to reach Guilliani, he is somehow missing now or at least he was yesterday....for his indictment
Meanwhile Arizona is trying to reach Guilliani, he is somehow missing now or at least he was yesterday....for his indictment
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Maybe he missed payments for his phone bills. That happened to me during my lean days.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
he might have, he's been grifting for money lately especially since he owes so much.......maybe we can follow the hair dye to find him?