There are some, I just spent an hour reading an article I thought would answer your question, but all it really said was that amber had less thc than cloudy, but no numbers. Most of the others I’ve found were pseudo scientific, somewhat helpful, lots of charts, but not sure how they came up with them, I’m not sure they’d pass “peer review”.Looking for any actual real science addressing potency/ripeness and color of trichomes, I can't seem to find anything. Is this all bro-science or are there actually studies around trichome color and potency? Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance,
Thanks!! Yea not much out there.There are some, I just spent an hour reading an article I thought would answer your question, but all it really said was that amber had less thc than cloudy, but no numbers. Most of the others I’ve found were pseudo scientific, somewhat helpful, lots of charts, but not sure how they came up with them, I’m not sure they’d pass “peer review”.
Unfortunately in that article I found nothing correlating clear, cloudy or amber to cannabinoid content of the trichome. Can you copy me on the part if it gives that correlation assuming I missed it? Thank youTrichome maturity varies from person to person some harvest when all clear just turning cloudy others prefer a mostly amber harvest but majority go for mostly milky/cloudy and a few ambers. Trichomes are most potent when cloudy/milky and after that it loses potency and when plants are harvested trichomes continue to mature in the curing process.
There was a sentence or two saying amber was less potent than cloudy, but it had no percentages, graphs or hard data, that I could find.Unfortunately in that article I found nothing correlating clear, cloudy or amber to cannabinoid content of the trichome. Can you copy me on the part if it gives that correlation assuming I missed it? Thank you
Yeah and no footnote so with no cannabinoid discussion it looks like it's not proven yet, just a correlate. I'm really looking forward to the Universities getting their hands on this and answering all of it! ThanksThere was a sentence or two saying amber was less potent than cloudy, but it had no percentages, graphs or hard data, that I could find.
That study was on maturity not potency. How the trichomes mature on cannabis. This study is on potency Thank youUnfortunately in that article I found nothing correlating clear, cloudy or amber to cannabinoid content of the trichome. Can you copy me on the part if it gives that correlation assuming I missed it? Thank you
The legalization of cannabis is the what is preventing the studies from being done. But some scientists are studying the plant but there is no current in depth research but new cannabinoids are being discovered in cannabis yearly so atleast there is progress although it's slow. Cannabis is a very complex plant and I believe untill it is fully legalized worldwide we will have to take the bits and pieces of studies untill thenYeah and no footnote so with no cannabinoid discussion it looks like it's not proven yet, just a correlate. I'm really looking forward to the Universities getting their hands on this and answering all of it! Thanks
If you looking for numbers I don't think you gonna find something but I will dig in the archives and see if I can't get something close for youThat study was on maturity not potency. How the trichomes mature on cannabis. This study is on potency Thank you
That article is on machine vision parameters for teaching a machine to visualize level of cannabis maturity. I see no lab tests on cannabinoid content in that article. Maturity is grossly marked by trichome color but you need lab analysis to give you potency of the cannabinoids within those trichomes and the changes as they mature. I could have missed it. I'm smoking some White Papaya and working on my electrical so I admit to reading it quickly.That study was on maturity not potency. How the trichomes mature on cannabis. This study is on potency Thank you
Exactly I was hoping they would completely deschedule and move to a wine model. But we appear to be handing it to big pharma but at least at Schedule III they can research it easily. Great study, my son will love it as he started with Machine Vision and loves pot I just sent him more of my Polar Gelato thanks for sharing itThe legalization of cannabis is the what is preventing the studies from being done. But some scientists are studying the plant but there is no current in depth research but new cannabinoids are being discovered in cannabis yearly so atleast there is progress although it's slow. Cannabis is a very complex plant and I believe untill it is fully legalized worldwide we will have to take the bits and pieces of studies untill then
Skip to Point 2.2 Trichome Maturation.That article is on machine vision parameters for teaching a machine to visualize level of cannabis maturity. I see no lab tests on cannabinoid content in that article. Maturity is grossly marked by trichome color but you need lab analysis to give you potency of the cannabinoids within those trichomes and the changes as they mature. I could have missed it. I'm smoking some White Papaya and working on my electrical so I admit to reading it quickly.
Lol nice just don't get shockedI could have missed it. I'm smoking some White Papaya and working on my electrical so I admit to reading it quickly.
They should classify it as a plant because that is what it is. It was here before humans .That's nice we need more scientists to study cannabisExactly I was hoping they would completely deschedule and move to a wine model. But we appear to be handing it to big pharma but at least at Schedule III they can research it easily. Great study, my son will love it as he started with Machine Vision and loves pot I just sent him more of my Polar Gelato thanks for sharing it
I saw that,Skip to Point 2.2 Trichome Maturation.
I think scientists only look at quality of cannabinoids because potency numbers will vary from cultivar to cultivar. But the 2 go hand in hand if quality degrades potency degrades aswell since cannabinoids are volatile