yellowvin7
Active Member
about how many watts in a CFL per plant? what is too much?
too much is when you have more heat they you can handle.about how many watts in a CFL per plant? what is too much?
If you want density, the more the merrier really, just make sure you can vent your space, heat is a killer. Those lumen figures are only accurate if they're refected properly and mounted horizontally and I would say 3000 lumens minimum per square foot. Good luckyou want to think about it more in lumens that wattage.....look on the cfls you buy and they should give you the lumen output. you want somewhere around 2000 (min) to 3000 lumens per sqft.
Agreed, thanks for chiming in bkstylz. It's all about coverage areayeah I agree....3000 lumens + is best but you can get away with 2000 before you start seeing poor growth. you just may have to do some bending if you go that low in lumens and plan on vegging for a while.
Yes sir, however CFLs don't overlap with lumenage, they must be spanned over the canpoy. For instance two bulbs, one over the other, will not have any light improvement over one bulb. However, if you spread those bulbs apart, the bulbs cover more area and your 3200 lumens become more effective. Good lucksay i have 1600 lumens with 1 cfl bulb, if i have 2 cfl bulbs will that equal 3200?
say i have 1600 lumens with 1 cfl bulb, if i have 2 cfl bulbs will that equal 3200?
damn how many plants u growingHow many lumens does a 400watt metal halide lamp put off I have 3 of these for veg and I have 3 400watthps for flowering
Pretty much.too much is when you have more heat they you can handle.
Absolutely incorrect. PAR efficiency is the ultimate measure of importance. CFL outclass HID.you want to think about it more in lumens that wattage.....look on the cfls you buy and they should give you the lumen output. you want somewhere around 2000 (min) to 3000 lumens per sqft.
It's more about direct light absorption.Agreed, thanks for chiming in bkstylz. It's all about coverage area
KC
Almost.say i have 1600 lumens with 1 cfl bulb, if i have 2 cfl bulbs will that equal 3200?
'Light' is additive. This is a property of electromagnetic radiation.Yes sir, however CFLs don't overlap with lumenage, they must be spanned over the canpoy. For instance two bulbs, one over the other, will not have any light improvement over one bulb. However, if you spread those bulbs apart, the bulbs cover more area and your 3200 lumens become more effective. Good luck
KC
Wrong again. But closer.. maybe? Light is additive. More photons in the proper wavelengths = more photosynthesis.No,
Lumens is a measurement for area so you can't just add.
Square the lumen of each bulb then sum them up.
Take the square root of the sum = total lumens
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ex.
1600^2 = 2560000 * 2 (number of the same bulb) =5120000
sq rt of 5120000 = 2263 lumens for 2 bulbs
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It will take 4 of the same bulb to double the lumens.
Remember area = width x depth
You are wrong.
Wrong again. But closer.. maybe? Light is additive. More photons in the proper wavelengths = more photosynthesis.
How many lumens does a 400watt metal halide lamp put off I have 3 of these for veg and I have 3 400watthps for flowering
around 36000How many lumens does a 400watt metal halide lamp put off I have 3 of these for veg and I have 3 400watthps for flowering
It looks like you're doing a^2 + b^2 = c^3, which is how a right triangle's sides(lengths) are related.It's the correct formula, look it up.
absolutely tosh no they dont "par is fuck all with out intensity. dont forget plants use every color in the light wave lenth exept green because thats the color they reflect back. I agree that red and blue is the most usable light by plants but its not the only color they use. hid slam out more light per watt than any light curantly avalabe to the home grower. thats why LED light is shit for growing buds there is no intensity from them, hids are good because of the over spill of all colors at high intensity. PAR may look good on paper, but it does not look good on your plants when it comes to using a HID. also MH (HID) as a beter PAR rating than a CFL and even an HPS hands down, but the HPS grow bigger buds why is that if PAR is the ultimate of importance? as i have said it all looks good on paper. but the truth is plants dont grow on paper they grow under light the more the better no matter what color it is so long as its not green.Absolutely incorrect. PAR efficiency is the ultimate measure of importance. CFL outclass HID.