I know plenty.I know it's an ancient Dianetics.It's a work of fiction that references actual sites, as MANY fictional books do.But I've said this three times now, and you won't address it.
i called you on this because you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to the bible.
Nope, they wanted to see that. There are just as many who saw nothing, dead relatives,buddha,a fucking unicorn....It's because you're dying, and your brain is trying to deal with it.
a hallucination ceases to be a hallucination when many people see the same thing -- as in seeing Jesus Christ.
as a fireman I have seen many people die and in their final moments many see Jesus as they are taking their last breaths.
See, that's the difference between you and me.I don't need people to agree with me to believe the way I do. I don't need validation. I've given plenty of references,in this thread, and out of it,and if you're too lazy to look it up, it's not my problem.
and you expect people to just believe this because you say so? you give no reference for your belief, talk about blind faith
Quote from that letter you linked us to.
"The Biblical writers did not pretend they were giving a complete history; instead they constantly refer us to other sources for full historical details, sources such as "The Annals of the Kings of Judah" (or Israel). It is therefore not possible to try to "prove" the Bible by means of checking its historical or scientific accuracy. The only "proof" to which it can be subjected is this: Does it correctly portray the God-human relationship? In the best analysis, the Bible is a religious book, not an historical document." Guess YOU didn't read THAT.
quote a few posts back:
"here's a letterhead from the smithsonian institute, quote:
"...much of the Bible, in particular the historical books of the old testament, are as accurate historical documents as any that we have from antiquity and are in fact more accurate than many of the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, or Greek histories..."
i guess you didn't read that part