leafwrapper
Well-Known Member
i was wondering if i could use soft white cfls for both vegging and flowering. ive read the soft whites r good for flowering how do they do for vegging?
question about soft white cfls.
- Thread starter leafwrapper
- Start date
F
FallenHero
Guest
They've done good so far for me 
btt
Well-Known Member
I have 2 soft white 29 watt/2200 lumen CFLs from HD in a Y socket for my lil seedlings right now and plan to get about 4 more in the next week or so. I will be using soft white for BOTH veg and flower. Will post my results in my grow journal. I have 3 that have sprouted so far 2-3 days ago.
BTT
BTT
leafwrapper
Well-Known Member
more opinions on using soft white floros for veg and flower?
leafwrapper
Well-Known Member
hey russ did u get a good yeild using soft whites for both stages?
F
FallenHero
Guest
i veg with them, i flower with HPS, so i couldnt answer that, however GK (Garden Knowm) grew this: https://www.rollitup.org/marijuana-pics/index.php?n=216
im not sure if its the same plant that yielded this, but
https://www.rollitup.org/marijuana-pics/index.php?n=215
also from GK. huge bud, plant yielded abt 3 oz on cfl's.
im not sure if its the same plant that yielded this, but
https://www.rollitup.org/marijuana-pics/index.php?n=215
also from GK. huge bud, plant yielded abt 3 oz on cfl's.
leafwrapper
Well-Known Member
was there a slow of growth in the veg stage under soft whites?
F
FallenHero
Guest
mine have had no problems vegging under it
leafwrapper
Well-Known Member
about an inch from the top of the plant is general rule of thumb is it not?
F
FallenHero
Guest
correct, just dont let them touch, in my expierence they will not burn unless touched.
shooter1961
Active Member
Guys you can speculate all day long but for sure you need cool white to veg. or a mixtue of both cool and warm. Cool being 5000k or better yet 6400k. Any thing less will effect yield no ? about that. You can grow with all kinds of lights but you are risking your freedom. Why would you want to do anything to lessen what u r going to get from your show. You will get some buds, small, fluffy, light buds. Use as much light as possible in the right spectrum, and you will be proud.
Good growing to all, and to all good night.
16 yr. farmer I'm out
Good growing to all, and to all good night.
16 yr. farmer I'm out
Brick Top
New Member
In an average home people will easily burn more unnecessary lighting in the evenings/nights than a 250-watt or 400-watt HID light would use.
4.16 60-watt light bulbs use as much wattage as a single 250-watt HID.
6.66 60-watt bulbs use as much wattage as a single 400-watt HID.
How many people cannot turn off 4 to 6 lights in their home each evening/night and offset the wattage used by HID lights? If you have an electric water heater you install a timer so it only runs for an hour or so just before you wake up and again for an hour or so shortly before you go to bed. With a well-insulated water heater you will still have hot water all day but you will save far more in electricity than a 400-watt HID light will begin to use. Electrical items that are turned off but remain plugged in will leak a small amount of electricity. Unplug what is seldom used and only plug it in when using them. If you have heat pumps raise youre A/C temp or lower your heat temp 2 degrees and you will offset more electricity than a 400-watt HID will begin to use.
Using HID lighting is not the major danger or waving red flag that so many people inaccurately claim it to be. The wattage used is not as major as it sounds when considering the watts per light and it can easily be offset with a little thought.
You do not have to take the home improvement store CFL route to avoid increased electricity usage. You do not have to lessen your yield or settle for light fluffy buds to avoid increased electricity usage. You only have to use a small portion of your brain.
That is what a person accepts if they take the CFL route. HID lighting produces more grams per watt used than any other type of grow lighting. Since most people can easily offset the amount of watts used by HID lighting why accept a lesser yield and a lower rate of efficiency per watt used by picking CFLs?
Most people who use CFLs assume that they use such a little amount of wattage that they can easily add them to the wattage already used regularly and it will not be a red flag. So most people increase their overall energy consumption using CFLs plus they end up with fewer grams per watt used. Is that a gain? Is that a plus?
Would it be better to use HID lighting and offset the wattage used and have a higher gram per watts used ratio? It sure seems that way to me.
2ndamendment
Active Member
my lady under the 14 watt cfl looks like its doing a lot better than my lady under the slyvian spot grow which yes i know shouldnt be used for growing....but what i got it for ...free...has worked really well for 4 plants in my box..first time grower...just throin in my two cents