We need more terror

medicineman

New Member
Pitching For More Dead Americans: A Neo-Con Fetish
The Ward Churchill of the demented right-wing has a deathwish for terror in order to unite the country Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, August 10, 2007


Another feverish Neo-Con has come out of the closet and admitted to enjoying the fetish that he shares with scores of other Administration apologists - a deathwish for more terror and more dead Americans in order to unite the country behind Bush.
"ONE MONTH from The Anniversary, I'm thinking another 9/11 would help America," laments Stu Bykofsky in his Philadelphia Daily News column.
"Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had not been so united since the first Day of Infamy - 12/7/41.
We knew who the enemy was then.
America's fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater.

What would sew us back together?
Another 9/11 attack.

It will take another attack on the homeland to quell the chattering of chipmunks and to restore America's righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail."
That's right - we need more terror or the terrorists will win!
Bykofsky is disappointed that 600,000 plus dead civilians along with thousands of slain troops in Iraq isn't enough to convince Americans that the war should be prosecuted with more vigor, so he's yearning for a kick up the backside in the form of thousands of dead Americans at home.
One could be forgiven for being cynical and thinking that Bykofsky, a plodding Neo-Con hack who nobody had heard of before last night, was just pushing the boat out in a desperate ploy to get a link on the Drudge Report, but reading his previous frenzied Bush administration boot-licking columns it becomes clear that Bykofsky actually means it.



Bykofsky screeches about the perils of "global terrorists who use Islam to justify their hideous sins, including blowing up women and children," and then invites them to slaughter more Americans - and even helps pinpoint the targets they should attack!
"The Golden Gate Bridge. Mount Rushmore. Chicago's Wrigley Field. The Philadelphia subway system," gushes Bykofsky.
Perhaps he should volunteer to send his own kids into those targets as jumbo jets are slammed into them, since Bykofsky is so eager to witness more American blood spilled in the name of the empire.
Or is there a greater threat? If Bykofsky has the courage of his convictions behind him, would he be willing to strap himself with explosives and run into a crowded shopping mall for the good of the country?
Obviously not, but only in using such extreme examples as a parallel can we begin to fathom the vulgarity of Bykofsky's remarks.


 

closet.cult

New Member
hahaha that is halarious. i especially like this part:

Philadelphia Daily News column.
"Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had not been so united since the first Day of Infamy - 12/7/41.
We knew who the enemy was then.

we had no idea who the enemy was. the majority of america still doesn't know who the enemy was back then. amercians do not need or want another 9/11. but bush would love one.
 

medicineman

New Member
hahaha that is halarious. i especially like this part:

Philadelphia Daily News column.
"Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had not been so united since the first Day of Infamy - 12/7/41.
We knew who the enemy was then.

we had no idea who the enemy was. the majority of america still doesn't know who the enemy was back then. amercians do not need or want another 9/11. but bush would love one.
And what ya want to bet he has one planned before the '08' elections?
 

iblazethatkush

Well-Known Member
And what ya want to bet he has one planned before the '08' elections?
For sure. They'll probably tie it in with invading Iran. And Vi and Wavels and everybody will be up in arms, saying "we need to go to war!" I can see it now.:spew:Maybe not though. They might be scared b/c of how bad 9/11 went, there are as many people who believe it was an inside job as people who don't. The truth will come out one day.
 

medicineman

New Member
For sure. They'll probably tie it in with invading Iran. And Vi and Wavels and everybody will be up in arms, saying "we need to go to war!" I can see it now.:spew:Maybe not though. They might be scared b/c of how bad 9/11 went, there are as many people who believe it was an inside job as people who don't. The truth will come out one day.
I'm still waiting for the truth behind the JFK assasination, that magic bullet thingy just doesn't add up, A perfect copper jacketed slug without any deformation after going through bone and lying in the stretcher in the hospital, yeah right. The idiots that believed that (Warren Commission) are mostly dead and gone, maybe we'll find out some day, the truth, But I doubt it.
 

iblazethatkush

Well-Known Member
I'm still waiting for the truth behind the JFK assasination, that magic bullet thingy just doesn't add up, A perfect copper jacketed slug without any deformation after going through bone and lying in the stretcher in the hospital, yeah right. The idiots that believed that (Warren Commission) are mostly dead and gone, maybe we'll find out some day, the truth, But I doubt it.
There's no doubt JFK was assasinated. It came weeks after he signed a bill that would of got rid of the Fed. He understood the evil of an inflation tax so he makes a law that the U.S. will start printing its own money which will be backed by silver. Weeks later he is assasinated. You don't need proof to know he was assasinated by the people who control the Fed. 2+2=4. The people who control the money, control the government.
 

marcnh

Well-Known Member
Yes I also believe that bush wants to extend his term by a planned false terrorist attack. IMO, If you thought 911 was not the military you are blind. I'd like to know what the 51 means.

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (National Security Presidential Directive NSPD-51/Homeland Security Presidential Directive HSPD-20, sometimes called simply "Executive Directive 51" for short), signed by United States President George W. Bush on May 4, 2007, is a Presidential Directive which specifies the procedures for continuity of the federal government in the event of a "catastrophic emergency." Such an emergency is construed as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Top