strictly seedleSs
Well-Known Member
Looking to save electricity, i want to convert my ballasts to 240. I was wondering how much electricity that would save. 10%, 25%, none, help me out please.
None. Same amount amount of electricity just less current which runs a cooler ballast.Looking to save electricity, i want to convert my ballasts to 240. I was wondering how much electricity that would save. 10%, 25%, none, help me out please.
Two 1000w 240v lights are just a little bit more electricity than one 1000w 120v light. Hope this helpsLooking to save electricity, i want to convert my ballasts to 240. I was wondering how much electricity that would save. 10%, 25%, none, help me out please.
Not according to like every light manufacturer in the world. It's even in the '09 Sunlight Supply catalog.Two 1000w 240v lights are just a little bit more electricity than one 1000w 120v light. Hope this helps
You are joking right????If all things are equal between 120 and 240 then why is your oven a 240 volt appliance or your dryer? There is a reason they make 240 lights. I have run systems both ways and there is def a power savings that you can see in your pocket book. Hope this helps
You are joking right????
Its power consumption and economics. Look at the high tension wires. 13KV, no insulation (other then varnish for corrosion) and lighter/cheaper runs.
Factory lights (typically are MH or HPS are 277V, thats *one* phase of a triple phase system that most factories run on.)
240 dryer/range is for power, *not* a electrical savings. Its cheaper (ie:less copper etc) for higher voltage. Higher voltage calls for better insuation, but being that most 'standard' wire insulation is rated for 600v an 80C (temp), insulation is cheaper.)
long runs of copper wire for 1/2 the current is cheaper enough to go higher voltage.
Watts is power used. Plain and simple. 400W on 120 vs 240, vs 480 is all the same. Twice the current at 1/2 the voltage, or twice the voltage vs 1/2 the current.. Ohm's law has *never* be disproved.
This right here kind of sums it up. If you were to have a stove on 120 it would work it just wouldn't be as efficiant as a 240. The wires would be very hot at 120 so they go with 240.thanks guys, but if the ballast was running cooler then the the system would be more efficient and save some electricity. I know cooler wires run more effectively.
The full thread is here, for anyone interested.You save a penny and a half per day on a 12 hour bloom cycle billed @ 11cents pKWh by running @ 240v...
I'm gonna switch right now!Not.
Lets put it another way. If you really love wriglys Juicy Fruit gum and it costs 1.29 at your local supermarket, after running your light @ 240v for
947 HOURS
you can get a "free" pack of gum.