Question about special brownies.

Armadillo Slim

Well-Known Member
Out come the "grown up" insults now, I think you were better at the childish name calling then you are at trying to sound intelligent. I said you called him an ass, someone else called him kid in a patronising way. It probably wasn't his best idea but other then that he seemed pretty reasonable until everyone on here started being a dick with him.
 

Armadillo Slim

Well-Known Member
And another thing that applies to most people on this site; weed isn't some spiritual thing that has fantastic medicinal properties, it's just a drug, a young persons drug. So when some 15 year old says he smokes weed you shouldn't be so surprised and appalled. Weed is mainly for people who have so much free time on their hands that they get bored of watching TV when they're sober so get stoned to make it a bit more interesting and pass the time faster. There's nothing wrong with that but the truth seems to be obscured by all the talk about it's magical powers.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Out come the "grown up" insults now, I think you were better at the childish name calling then you are at trying to sound intelligent. I said you called him an ass, someone else called him kid in a patronising way.
Perhaps you should read your own posts before responding, Sir Issac Newton. You called me out for using the word 'kid.'

I do not have to 'try to sound intelligent.' Pee Wee did not 'try' to appear as an angry and emotionally unbalanced 9th grader. Just as you need not 'try' to appear as whatever it is you are. It all comes out in the wash. Simply put, it is what it is.
It probably wasn't his best idea but other then that he seemed pretty reasonable until everyone on here started being a dick with him.
Go back and read the thread; he suggested those who disagreed with his plan should 'go eat a dick.' When others opined that it was a bad idea, he went ballistic and then admitted he was a minor. He had no business being here and subsequently proved it.

We had fun baiting his dumb ass until he was banned. Although his more caustic posts have been deleted, it remains plain to see precisely who was misbehaving. Step down off your high horse before you get dizzy and fall off.

Defend him if you must, but the fact remains: You bet on the wrong pony. :dunce:
 

Armadillo Slim

Well-Known Member
Read it again, I never said you called him kid but that doesn't matter anyway. I can't keep track of exactly what happend because posts have been deleted but at the time it seemed to stay reasonable until he admitted he was 15 and eveyrone started patronising him, we were all 15 at some point. Either way, he's 15 so we should take the highground instead of winding him up and then whining when he gets angry.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Is it really necassary to call him "kid" or ""ass" for short" how very mature of you Johny
He was angry long before anyone wound him up for being a minor. In fact, it was in his anger over our dissenting opinions that he admitted his age.

Did we make sport of him? Indeed we did. And the angrier he became, the more fun we had.

We exclude minors from this forum for several good reasons. I question why you feel obliged to act as an apologist for someone who broke rules put in place to protect the integrity of this site.

Nobody is whining. Laughing, Yes. Whining, no.
 

tip top toker

Well-Known Member
well said. that was an amusing read. as said, while some instances might call for a sneaky speciual browny being served. if the person does not take the drugs in the first place out of a firm personal choice, based on moral and logical reasons, whether they're wrong or not, you change his mind by explaining the other side of the story in a way he'll understand and maybe take in, as opposed to (i don't agree with the word poisoning personally) stripping him of his rights and beliefs and who he is.

as someone said, he might take pride in not smoking weed. i certainly take pride in that despite numerous offers, tasties lying around, i don't touch anything but booze and the herb. so i'd be pretty damned pissed if someone shoved 4 grams of coke up my nose while i wasn't looking.
 

tanman1990

Well-Known Member
I have to say, after reading this thread.... soooo many people went off topic. This was not a moral debate thread. Keep with the question asked.

Johnyorganic, and some others
were rude as fuck, and led the thread completely off topic.

The question at hand was "will a first timer feel the effects of the pot brownies?"

It should never have gotten as far off as it did. I'm new here, but I've been on forums for years. I'm not trying to get more people pissed, I'm just callin em as i sees em from a neutral view.
 

Katatawnic

Well-Known Member
I have to say, after reading this thread.... soooo many people went off topic. This was not a moral debate thread. Keep with the question asked.

Johnyorganic, and some others
were rude as fuck, and led the thread completely off topic.

The question at hand was "will a first timer feel the effects of the pot brownies?"

It should never have gotten as far off as it did. I'm new here, but I've been on forums for years. I'm not trying to get more people pissed, I'm just callin em as i sees em from a neutral view.
Gotcha tanman, point taken! And when someone tells me he wants to rape a girl and ends the tale (including justifications as to why the rape is being planned) with a question as to whether or not a condom should be used, I suppose I'm expected to just stick with answering the question about condoms.

Apples and oranges, you say? Think again. Drugging others against their will is mental/emotional rape, a violation. It's not a just moral issue; it is a crime. Oh sure, many refer to marijuana use as a "victimless crime" (I'm one of them), but you remove "victimless" from the equation the moment you give it to others against their will. Period. End of subject.

Further, if we're to "stay on topic" with the question posed, then why did you post with a lecture? Sounds a bit like "Do as I say, not as I do" to me.

I question why you feel obliged to act as an apologist for someone who broke rules put in place to protect the integrity of this site.
Hear, hear! :clap: 'Nuff said.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
I have to say, after reading this thread.... soooo many people went off topic. This was not a moral debate thread. Keep with the question asked.

Johnyorganic, and some others
were rude as fuck, and led the thread completely off topic.

The question at hand was "will a first timer feel the effects of the pot brownies?"

It should never have gotten as far off as it did. I'm new here, but I've been on forums for years. I'm not trying to get more people pissed, I'm just callin em as i sees em from a neutral view.
I never told anyone to 'get off my nuts' or to 'eat a dick.' I never called anyone's mother a prostitute. Nor did I call anyone a 'retard.' I had some fun baiting a juvenile delinquent who took the thread in a whole new direction. If you object to my reaction to his inane babbling and puerile rants, sue me. :finger:

Apparently you did not read the thread at all. If you did you only comprehended every other word. :dunce:

Try again and get back to us when you finish up. Is next week good for you?
 

tanman1990

Well-Known Member
You were on his nuts, big time. If you don't like what someone has to say, and its their thread, shut the fuck up. its that simple. everybody is different morally. If you like talking bout specifics of rape, and are on a rape forum site somewhere, and you ask a question about something, i'd still expect it to remain about the question at hand. If he wanted moral advice he would have asked you know? its just rude to hijack his thread with a new topic about the morals of putting weed secretly into brownies. jeeez, relax. :bigjoint: make your own thread about it if you feel so strongly. Don't jack someone's. It would be like me going on someone's grow journal and starting talking about the benefits of metal halide lights over the cfl's the person is using.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
You were on his nuts, big time. If you don't like what someone has to say, and its their thread, shut the fuck up. its that simple. everybody is different morally. If you like talking bout specifics of rape, and are on a rape forum site somewhere, and you ask a question about something, i'd still expect it to remain about the question at hand. If he wanted moral advice he would have asked you know? its just rude to hijack his thread with a new topic about the morals of putting weed secretly into brownies. jeeez, relax. :bigjoint: make your own thread about it if you feel so strongly. Don't jack someone's. It would be like me going on someone's grow journal and starting talking about the benefits of metal halide lights over the cfl's the person is using.
you are jacking this thread. :roll:
 

tanman1990

Well-Known Member
you are jacking this thread. :roll:

true, so back onto the topic at hand. My first time smoking I got pretty high, I have yet to ingest MJ, but I think it would work the first time, even though he hasn't smoked before, or had it in any way that you know of.
 

Ne0.

Member
i have eaten a single cookie that took my legs away for 8 hours. :hump:
Typically they take an hour or 2 to kick in up to 3 hours to REALLY kick in, I'd make sure you could stick around your brother to kind of ease him through it, especially if you are going to unknowingly make him ingest it. You're going to do what you're going to do, I think if your brother is lighthearted and you catch him in the right mood you might change his mind about it, but more likely than not he's going to be mad as hell you essentially "drugged" him and affirm his negative outlook on the best plant in the world.
 

Armadillo Slim

Well-Known Member
I made some brownies with the small leaves and the tiny fluffy buds with not much on them after my harvest but they didn't do anything for me. I was wondering if I did something wrong because I thought I'd used enough at the time, does it help if you dry the shake out first? Because I just chucked it in the oil when they were wet for half an hour. I'd like to try ingesting for once but I just can't stand to use prime buds like that. I might make some green dragon some time, any experiences with that?
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
You were on his nuts, big time. If you don't like what someone has to say, and its their thread, shut the fuck up. its that simple. everybody is different morally. If you like talking bout specifics of rape, and are on a rape forum site somewhere, and you ask a question about something, i'd still expect it to remain about the question at hand. If he wanted moral advice he would have asked you know? its just rude to hijack his thread with a new topic about the morals of putting weed secretly into brownies. jeeez, relax. :bigjoint: make your own thread about it if you feel so strongly. Don't jack someone's. It would be like me going on someone's grow journal and starting talking about the benefits of metal halide lights over the cfl's the person is using.
He hijacked his own thread. I played along. How was objecting to his insidious plan off topic? Or be construed as standing on his nuts? Members disagreed and he threw a tantrum and started slinging insults. At that point did I stand on his raisin sack? You bet I did; with both size twelve gunboats.

Of course you might be forgiven because you are operating from a position of ignorance as many of his more abusive posts have been removed. My responses were left in the thread.

If that makes me an ogre in your estimation, so be it. Your opinion of me is irrelevant. :fire:
 
Top