A Pro Palin thread

[medicineman]

Strange, describing your political party, a party that is certainly dominated by selfish hypcocritical losers, who can't accept the fact that life is unfair. That outcomes are never equal, and that those that work and save are the one's that get ahead in the world. The Democrats are a party for ignorant imbeciles that have no creative or industrious spark left in their pathetic minds but are merely content to be sheep fed to the wolves of the bureaucracy that rules them, and treats them like slaves.

It is an insult to all of humanity to call Socialists people, but it's an insult to all animals to equate Democrats with them, I should apologize to the sheep...

I refrain from the name calling parade that you so readily abuse. Just let it be said that in all your self importance that, like it or not, you are but one of 6+ billion, and a disgusting one at that.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

I refrain from the name calling parade that you so readily abuse. Just let it be said that in all your self importance that, like it or not, you are but one of 6+ billion, and a disgusting one at that.

You're calling for enslaving the masses, and I'm the one's that disgusting.

Typical Socialist Drivel, and you still haven't explained how Social Security did a damn thing, the money taken in taxes could have easily been used by the people to fund their own retirements, with a lot better results, even outside of investing in the stockmarket.

Nasa on the other hand has provided jobs that pay better, require an educated populous, and lead to the information age. Many billions of dollars that generated jobs, and growth of knowledge, but you spurn knowledge, don't you enslaver, because knowledge empowers individuals, but you don't want the individual empowered, you want them ignorant and enslaved by imbeciles like yourself.

You're worse than the Catholic Church, at least they were honest about their fear of knowledge.

 

[medicineman]

You're calling for enslaving the masses, and I'm the one's that disgusting.

Typical Socialist Drivel, and you still haven't explained how Social Security did a damn thing, the money taken in taxes could have easily been used by the people to fund their own retirements, with a lot better results, even outside of investing in the stockmarket.

Nasa on the other hand has provided jobs that pay better, require an educated populous, and lead to the information age. Many billions of dollars that generated jobs, and growth of knowledge, but you spurn knowledge, don't you enslaver, because knowledge empowers individuals, but you don't want the individual empowered, you want them ignorant and enslaved by imbeciles like yourself.

You're worse than the Catholic Church, at least they were honest about their fear of knowledge.

You take yourself way too serious dude, get over yourself. Go to your blogesphere and rap to your base. Your puke does not resonate with me. I have my beliefs and you have yours. It does not mean that you are smarter or superior, just that you are different. You are not in control and never will be. Go tell your listeners this crap because it doesn't interest me in the least what you think. As far as I can tell. you are just an egoistic asshole. There, The name calling is over, piss off.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

You take yourself way too serious dude, get over yourself. Go to your blogesphere and rap to your base. Your puke does not resonate with me. I have my beliefs and you have yours. It does not mean that you are smarter or superior, just that you are different. You are not in control and never will be. Go tell your listeners this crap because it doesn't interest me in the least what you think. As far as I can tell. you are just an egoistic asshole. There, The name calling is over, piss off.

Really, one would imagine that you would have learned how to keep a stiff upper lip, but whatever. Suit yourself.

 

[medicineman]

Really, one would imagine that you would have learned how to keep a stiff upper lip, but whatever. Suit yourself.

I think you would be way more appreciated on your own right wing blogsite. Trying to take over RIU is an effort reflected by your incessant scorn of anything left of Atilla the Hun. There may be more right wing idiots on this site, but quanity does not quality make. Your idiotic (Schizophrenic) depiction of my values is very indicative of your illness, a right wing disease called Shit-for-brains. See a psychiatrist and call me in the morning.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

I think you would be way more appreciated on your own right wing blogsite. Trying to take over RIU is an effort reflected by your incessant scorn of anything left of Atilla the Hun. There may be more right wing idiots on this site, but quanity does not quality make. Your idiotic (Schizophrenic) depiction of my values is very indicative of your illness, a right wing disease called Shit-for-brains. See a psychiatrist and call me in the morning.

Who said I was trying to take over RIU?

Especially by merely posting here. If I wanted to try taking over RIU I'd launch a competing site...

 

[PadawanBater]

And yet you totally disregard the threat of sickle cell anemia?

Pretty racist right there buddy...

On NASA, I definitely agree with TBT on this one. NASA is a huge part of why America is great. I don't get why some people can't see the epic importance of NASA's role in the world. Not to mention it doesn't even equal 1% of the military budget... if you're going to bitch about NASA, maybe you should start bitching about how much we spend on "defense" first... That would make a little bit more sense. Or howbout this, better yet, don't bitch about things you don't know anything about... Good rule of thumb to follow.

Get educated on NASA and you'll be happy to pay for the shit they do.

 

[ChChoda]

Pretty racist right there buddy...

On NASA, I definitely agree with TBT on this one. NASA is a huge part of why America is great. I don't get why some people can't see the epic importance of NASA's role in the world. Not to mention it doesn't even equal 1% of the military budget... if you're going to bitch about NASA, maybe you should start bitching about how much we spend on "defense" first... That would make a little bit more sense. Or howbout this, better yet, don't bitch about things you don't know anything about... Good rule of thumb to follow.

Get educated on NASA and you'll be happy to pay for the shit they do.

I was just putting your bigotry in front of the mirror, friend.

As for "defense", it's in the Constitution.

 

[PadawanBater]

I was just putting your bigotry in front of the mirror, friend.

As for "defense", it's in the Constitution.

Because I'm concerned about the candidates age, and whether they die in office and leave the free world in the hands of a retard, that makes me a biggot?

I don't follow that logic... but maybe it's me...


And "defense" may be in the constitution, but absurd military spending is not. There is a difference.

As for the people who support Palin, get a load of this guy! lmfao!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rSPXRmPhw&feature=channel_page

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

I was just putting your bigotry in front of the mirror, friend.

As for "defense", it's in the Constitution.

Yeah, along with a line that specifies that the government should not maintain standing armies, and any appropriation should not be for a term longer of two years for the army.

About the only standing force the US is authorized to have is the Navy, and by extension the Marines.

 

[ChChoda]

Because I'm concerned about the candidates age, and whether they die in office and leave the free world in the hands of a retard, that makes me a biggot?

I don't follow that logic... but maybe it's me...

It is.

 

[ChChoda]

Yeah, along with a line that specifies that the government should not maintain standing armies, and any appropriation should not be for a term longer of two years for the army.

About the only standing force the US is authorized to have is the Navy, and by extension the Marines.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html#section2

Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html#section2

Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

Section 8 - Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

 

[ChChoda]

Section 8 - Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

So every two years they must vote for appropriations.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

So every two years they must vote for appropriations.

True that, but wouldn't that raise the logical consideration that every two years they would have to release any obligations imposed upon enlisted personnel and officers as well?

I mean, surely if the government can only raise appropriations for two years for the army, it can not in good faith state that it is going to be able to pay some one in three that has enlisted for four, and thus any standing army should not be raised for longer than two years.

Of course, such an argument fails on the basis that most wars drag out for a lot longer than two years.

But some of the projects that government undertakes on the behalf of the armed forces do not meet the two year requirement for defense apppropriations. Though I still don't see what the founders were thinking when they failed to put in a requirement of a balanced budget.

 

[medicineman]

Because I'm concerned about the candidates age, and whether they die in office and leave the free world in the hands of a retard, that makes me a biggot?

I don't follow that logic... but maybe it's me...


And "defense" may be in the constitution, but absurd military spending is not. There is a difference.

As for the people who support Palin, get a load of this guy! lmfao!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rSPXRmPhw&feature=channel_page

That kid was obviously retarded. I wonder who brainwashed him. I noticed he was sitting in what looked like a nice middle class home. Now if he had struggled and worked his ass off to pay for that home, I would be much more inclined to take him seriously, but obviously this wet-behind- the-ear kiid Has been brainwashed by some group like the JBS. Pathetic

 

[ChChoda]

True that, but wouldn't that raise the logical consideration that every two years they would have to release any obligations imposed upon enlisted personnel and officers as well?

I mean, surely if the government can only raise appropriations for two years for the army, it can not in good faith state that it is going to be able to pay some one in three that has enlisted for four, and thus any standing army should not be raised for longer than two years.

Of course, such an argument fails on the basis that most wars drag out for a lot longer than two years.

But some of the projects that government undertakes on the behalf of the armed forces do not meet the two year requirement for defense apppropriations. Though I still don't see what the founders were thinking when they failed to put in a requirement of a balanced budget.

I've looked at government contracts before. All the ones that I've seen stipulate that if funding is not approved, your pay is in arrears. Simply put, we (big gubment) will pay you IF and WHEN we can, or never. Sign on the dotted line.

All the more reason to respect the enlisted men and women of the armed forces.

 

[Katatawnic]

[youtube]eUdnAk9KG8U[/youtube]

 

[ChChoda]

[youtube]eUdnAk9KG8U[/youtube]

It's been done before...nice try though.

 

[Katatawnic]

I didn't "try" anything. It's not my video. I just thought it was cute.