Johnny Retro
Well-Known Member
I belive his question was what are you going to do about it on a marijuana cultivation site
Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)
- Thread starter GrowRebel
- Start date
- Status
FoxCompany426
Well-Known Member
Hahahaha! He provided an end result of his plan, but no plan.I belive his question was what are you going to do about it on a marijuana cultivation site
K
Keenly
Guest
when some one tells me im wasting my life fighting for truth i tend to get a little offendedsounds like a beauty pageant speech.
except for the insults.
K
Keenly
Guest
no plan? your LOOKING at it...
this thread.... spreading the truth of the governments lies and cover ups
thats been the plan for a good year or 2 for me now
handing out posters putting up flies etc spreading the word that is the plan
K
Keenly
Guest
im going to smoke my weed and find as much information on things i deem a threat to freedom as i canI belive his question was what are you going to do about it on a marijuana cultivation site
so to recap
im going to
spread the word
smoke the weed
and finally im going to triple post
FoxCompany426
Well-Known Member
Hahahaha, very nice!
I wasn't intentionally being an ass, just couldn't help it. Conspiracy theories entertain me. No hard feelings?
K
Keenly
Guest
i may get offended, but i never hold a grudge or take personal real life offense over some text posted on the internet
so its all good
like i said in a thread i made before, ill still smoke with any one of you regardless of your opinion
FoxCompany426
Well-Known Member
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
We have a plan ... for those that have a mind to want to do it. I put it up back on page 104 post #1034
And the political forum on this site is no different than any other political site. Spreading the word is what's important. Not where you do it from.
Cool
Thanks for putting this up. The more witnesses to the crime the better. I discovered they have a link in the video! Nice.
Excellent question. I was just a kid when it happen and I believed the government. Inside jobs were never thought of then. We only had corporate news, and who knows how long operation mockingbird has been in effect?
Ah ... this just in ...
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20880Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part Two - Security Kevin Ryan 911 Essay
Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center (WTC) towers? This is the second essay in a series that attempts to answer that question. The first installment began by considering the tenants that occupied the impact zones and the other floors that might have played a useful role in the demolition of the WTC towers. [1] The result was a picture of connections to organizations that had access to explosive materials and to the expertise required to use explosives. Additionally it was seen that, in the years preceding 9/11, the impact zone tenants had all made structural modifications to the areas where the airliners struck the buildings.
The management representatives of these tenant companies were seen to be secretive and powerful. Through these powerful people, the tenants were connected to organizations that benefited greatly from the 9/11 attacks, including the defense contractors Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Halliburton, and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). The tenants also had strong connections to the Bush family and their corporate network, including Dresser Industries (now Halliburton) and UBS, and to Deutsche Bank and its subsidiaries, reported to have brokered the insider trading deals. There were also links between these tenant companies and the terrorist-financing Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).
Remember when I put up the first part way back on page 80 post #798 Now we have both parts. Answers a lot of questions as to why those buildings were demo.
We have a plan ... for those that have a mind to want to do it. I put it up back on page 104 post #1034
And the political forum on this site is no different than any other political site. Spreading the word is what's important. Not where you do it from.
Cool
Excellent question. I was just a kid when it happen and I believed the government. Inside jobs were never thought of then. We only had corporate news, and who knows how long operation mockingbird has been in effect?
you can't even research this simple fact. your credibility with me just went in the SHITTER.
simple goolge search. i could go deeper and probably find an exact date of the first article or whatever.
There are many conspiracy theories regarding the assassination of John F. Kennedy on 22 November 1963 that arose soon after his death and continue to be promoted today. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
I was speaking of myself personally ... not generally. As a child ... I had no access to that type of information ... nor would I have been interested. Inside jobs where not part of my consciousness back then. It's like you are looking so hard to nail me on something. Why is that?you can't even research this simple fact. your credibility with me just went in the SHITTER.
simple goolge search. i could go deeper and probably find an exact date of the first article or whatever.
There are many conspiracy theories regarding the assassination of John F. Kennedy on 22 November 1963 that arose soon after his death and continue to be promoted today. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories
i'm not looking to nail you, i just think you are twisting everything in your favor. it's falling out everywhere.I was speaking of myself personally ... not generally. As a child ... I had no access to that type of information ... nor would I have been interested. Inside jobs where not part of my consciousness back then. It's like you are looking so hard to nail me on something. Why is that?
you seem to be trying so hard to prove something yourself.
Get with it man. It's about being on the side you think is going to win, it's about being popular.
FoxCompany426
Well-Known Member
What?
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Example?
It would be impossible for me to prove this by myself. All I am doing is posting information about what happen. I make no bones about my opinion on this matter, but I have worked to back up why I have such an opinion.
GrowRebel
Well-Known Member
Some are that way ... true ... but I'm hoping their number are small ... hoping.
what... huh?
Active Member
You will enjoy this. Like this jackass you will mistake wind noise for explosions... but it is a vantage point I have not seen before and thought all should see.
[youtube]UkjvKGbaewg[/youtube]
Here you can see the main truss failing (by fire or... explosives) and the internal structure collapsing in on itself... and then the facade basically dropping around it... which is why it looks so "demo". Which, in terms of accuracy, could have been handled with charges just as easily. But you can see how the structure fails internally, and then the shell just drops. Really wish we had some video of the base of that thing.
As for my side of the argument, the internal structure collapsing first shows that something structurally failed horribly... and while it certainly doesnt rule out demo, does show how failure of the three main web trusses which support the entire building could have caused internal collapse. Never seen a building do anything like that before.
I have another video for you that you will like too. I already see what you will see... but what I see is a key structural point in the middle being caused to fail, and the top of a building is used crush the bottom half... and then destroying itself.
[youtube]syzKBBB_THE[/youtube]
People ask why I show videos that they see as furthering their cause. Because I see how they will see this, does not mean that they do, but I am not afraid of truth.
Now that is a weird demo. I don't know how they did that... and wish I spoke french... but I am looking into it.
Lastly... this is a typical demo of a WIDE building... the WTC was bigger than these... note the number of concussive explosions. Also note that it goes from the bottom down, not the top.
[youtube]j6tGgg4aiG4&NR[/youtube]
Enjoy.
[youtube]UkjvKGbaewg[/youtube]
Here you can see the main truss failing (by fire or... explosives) and the internal structure collapsing in on itself... and then the facade basically dropping around it... which is why it looks so "demo". Which, in terms of accuracy, could have been handled with charges just as easily. But you can see how the structure fails internally, and then the shell just drops. Really wish we had some video of the base of that thing.
As for my side of the argument, the internal structure collapsing first shows that something structurally failed horribly... and while it certainly doesnt rule out demo, does show how failure of the three main web trusses which support the entire building could have caused internal collapse. Never seen a building do anything like that before.
I have another video for you that you will like too. I already see what you will see... but what I see is a key structural point in the middle being caused to fail, and the top of a building is used crush the bottom half... and then destroying itself.
[youtube]syzKBBB_THE[/youtube]
People ask why I show videos that they see as furthering their cause. Because I see how they will see this, does not mean that they do, but I am not afraid of truth.
Now that is a weird demo. I don't know how they did that... and wish I spoke french... but I am looking into it.
Lastly... this is a typical demo of a WIDE building... the WTC was bigger than these... note the number of concussive explosions. Also note that it goes from the bottom down, not the top.
[youtube]j6tGgg4aiG4&NR[/youtube]
Enjoy.
CrackerJax
New Member
Holey smokes.......
Now you can see why you are called the "fringe element".- Status