Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

[The Warlord]

I miss Jimmy Hoffa. He'd know what to do about this.

 

[Keenly]

Holey smokes....... Now you can see why you are called the "fringe element".

oh so you support the patriot act?

you support the pillaging of those poor impoverished people?

sweet, ill count on you to vote for more freedom restricting and constitution violating legislation

 

[CrackerJax]

oh so you support the patriot act?

you support the pillaging of those poor impoverished people?

sweet, ill count on you to vote for more freedom restricting and constitution violating legislation

I support any program which keeps Americans safe. If you are so concerned about the Constitution, you have voted in the wrong President.

Can you say naive?

 

[wyteboi]

I have one question....

If you really do figure out what exactly happened on 9/11, what do you plan on doing?

Can't really justify wasting your life talking about conspiracies on a MARIJUANA CULTIVATING forum without a game plan, eh?

Thanks for the entertainment.

well when that day comes you will see the plan.... . i am glad u find this entertaining. go back to the other part of RUI.
it might be funny to you but some of us work hard on this shit and some of us will go to the grave still tryin.

 

[wyteboi]

oh and the jfk thing..... i am only 30 somthing so i have no idea. On 911 i was alot older and NOT dumb enough to believe them buildings fell perfect like that. THEN a couple years later i got the internet and been reading "official and unofficial reports" ever since.....So i have been working on this shit for at least 7 years now.

 

[NoDrama]

I support any program which keeps Americans safe. If you are so concerned about the Constitution, you have voted in the wrong President.

Can you say naive?

Statistically you are much more likely to be struck by lightning than harmed by a real life terrorist. The Dept of Homeland Security isn't keeping anyone safe.

 

[GrowRebel]

You will enjoy this. Like this jackass you will mistake wind noise for explosions... but it is a vantage point I have not seen before and thought all should see.

Number 16 ... number 16
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.

Here you can see the main truss failing (by fire or... explosives) and the internal structure collapsing in on itself... and then the facade basically dropping around it... which is why it looks so "demo".

No ... the reason it "looks so demo" is because it is. There are plenty of witnesses that stated they heard explosions ... plus the fact that the building fell with no resistance what so ever. What happen to the undamaged steel?
Sorry, but the video really does support our claims.

Which, in terms of accuracy, could have been handled with charges just as easily. But you can see how the structure fails internally, and then the shell just drops. Really wish we had some video of the base of that thing.

Still doesn't explain what happen to the undamaged steel which was 80%. No resistance ... demo ... resistance ... other causes.

As for my side of the argument, the internal structure collapsing first shows that something structurally failed horribly...

And why was that? It couldn't have been because of the fire, because it wasn't hot enough nor was the damage great enough to bring the whole building down at free fall speed into it's own foot print. So what cause all that structural steel to suddenly fail at the exact same time?

and while it certainly doesnt rule out demo,

Thank you ...

does show how failure of the three main web trusses which support the entire building could have caused internal collapse.

Ah no sorry ... a building is not going to collapse at free fall speed because three main trusses give way. Nope ... doesn't happen.

Never seen a building do anything like that before.

Well golly gee ... I wonder why?

I have another video for you that you will like too. I already see what you will see... but what I see is a key structural point in the middle being caused to fail, and the top of a building is used crush the bottom half... and then destroying itself.

Ah no ... stuff like that just doesn't happen with these buildings ... it goes against what they were design to do.

People ask why I show videos that they see as furthering their cause. Because I see how they will see this, does not mean that they do, but I am not afraid of truth.

Well when you finally accept the truth you won't be as traumatized as the others will you?

Now that is a weird demo. I don't know how they did that... and wish I spoke french... but I am looking into it.

Lastly... this is a typical demo of a WIDE building... the WTC was bigger than these... note the number of concussive explosions. Also note that it goes from the bottom down, not the top.

Yeah ... just like the number of explosions that were in the video I posted. Which proves those buildings were demo.

 

[GrowRebel]

Statistically you are much more likely to be struck by lightning than harmed by a real life terrorist. The Dept of Homeland Security isn't keeping anyone safe.

Yeah ... he's one of those suckers that are born every minute I hear tell about. The elite loves dummies like him. So easy to fool. The elite are far more of a threat that any terrorist could ever hope to be. I keep my eye on them rather than a make believe terrorist they have made up to scare the weak minded.
(happy wave here)

 

[GrowRebel]

you'd pick it apart word for word and deny it. i have better things to do.

So in other words you can't show me an example of where I have picked apart things word for word and then deny it because you have better things to do right? Okay ...what ever.

 

[fdd2blk]

So in other words you can't show me an example of where I have picked apart things word for word and then deny it because you have better things to do right? Okay ...what ever.

there is no "other words". i said what i said.

 

[CrackerJax]

ANYONE can run around copy/pasting ideas.....that doesn't make them correct. I'll take quality of info over quantity of info any day. GR goes for quantity....no matter how crazy it sounds.

Meanwhile living in his parents basement...he sends up for some more cheese fries....

 

[The Warlord]

Allah Akbar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[CrackerJax]

Ba-shing Bush Ba-sher

 

[The Warlord]

Ba-shing Bush Ba-sher

Ze Bush, He waz Goot. I like ze Bush. History vill show heem in ze pozitive light. Ja.

Farfignutten.

 

[wyteboi]

ANYONE can run around copy/pasting ideas.....that doesn't make them correct. I'll take quality of info over quantity of info any day. GR goes for quantity....no matter how crazy it sounds.

Meanwhile living in his parents basement...he sends up for some more cheese fries....

just look at your profile and look at ours and u tell me whos livin in mommy's basement ??

u2 warlord look at YOUR activity

 

[Parker]

Statistically you are much more likely to be struck by lightning than harmed by a real life terrorist. The Dept of Homeland Security isn't keeping anyone safe.

More money needs to be pumped into the Lightning Prevention Bureau. I've said that all along.

 

[GrowRebel]

FlashBack ... let's not forget this video folks that scientifically proves that the fire was not hot enough to do the damage they claim. I posted this way back on page 76 post 753, but I think it needs to be re-posted.

9/11 FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9/11 Commission Lies
[youtube]yllhB2HYIP0&feature=related[/youtube]
This completely blows the disinformationalist/deniers fantasy that fire and jet fuel brought down those towers.
They have no explanation as to how those towers could come down when it has been scientifically proven the fires weren't nearly hot enough. In fact they cooled down 15 minutes after impact. Why was that?

 

[fdd2blk]

 

[GrowRebel]

ANYONE can run around copy/pasting ideas.....that doesn't make them correct.

You mean what you tried to do but failed miserably?
Number 23 ... number 23 ...
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

I'll take quality of info over quantity of info any day. GR goes for quantity....no matter how crazy it sounds.

Number 3 ... number 3 ...
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

Meanwhile living in his parents basement...he sends up for some more cheese fries....

Number 18 ... number 18 ...
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent.
Number 1 ... number 1
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

Number 17 ... number 17 ...
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic

Allah Akbar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Number 5 ... number 5
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.
Number 6 ... number 6
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer.

Ba-shing Bush Ba-sher

Traits of the Disinformationalist
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain. Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
Fits like a glove

 

[The Warlord]

just look at your profile and look at ours and u tell me whos livin in mommy's basement ??

u2 warlord look at YOUR activity

I only post on here while i am at work. This is my homepage. I disconected my DSL at home, Ja.

My avataR CAN BEAT UP YOUR AVATAR!