Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

[NoDrama]

Bin Laden is NOT on the FBI top ten most wanted list for the 911 attacks, he is on the list for the 1998 embassy bombings and the attack on the USS Cole, but not for 9-11. I wonder why? Didn't he supposedly put out a video claiming responsibility?

 

[wyteboi]

Thank you FDD i really think this is important. i'll keep myself calm (happy wave)

 

[what... huh?]

If they invented the situation, and the evidence against him... why wouldn't they? Obviously there is another reason.

(My theory makes more sense as to that)

 

[fdd2blk]

 

[The Warlord]

I already touched on this in my alien attack theory. Nice pic though. Thats exactly what i said happened like 9 pages ago.!

 

[GrowRebel]

Thank you for opening this very important thread.
[FONT=&quot]

So instead of a plane, slicing one side of the structural supports, the force of the explosion, [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]and a tremendous and instant fire which burned for at minimum 50 minutes weakening the steel enough to bring it down on top of the ONE floor above and start a chain reaction...

Total bullshit ... it has already been proven scientifically that those fires were no were near hot enough to bring those building down. You refuse to address the issue of the fires cooling down 15 minutes after impact. So your "chain reaction" bullshit don't wash, and was debunked long ago.

You go with they rigged the building with hundreds of thousands of tons of thermite, unnoticed, with RC detonators presumably on a huge battery backup on every floor... unnoticed.

It's pretty obvious it went unnoticed.

Roof giving out first...

It only looks like the roof gave out first. This image shows an explosion going off at the base ...

[/FONT][FONT=&quot]I don't have a clue why the image won't show.

The if the first of the three trusses to collapse was #3, the one under that... then it would.

Ah ... no ... it wouldn't and it didn't ... not without some serious help.

Flaming debris? or no damage? Remember how long the rubble burned for... that debris was very hot.

Oh yeah we remember ... the two towers burned less than 2 hours and the fire NEVER got hot enough to do the damage they claim. That has been proven without a doubt. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]What happen to the undamaged steel? You continue to disregard cold hard facts. [/FONT][FONT=&quot]

Weenie roast and chunks of building. Burned for how many hours across how many floors?

Less than 2 hours ... and not nearly as many floors needed to burn in order to bring the building down, nor nearly enough time to burn. There was way too much steel that was not damage. Yet when the building fell there was no resistance ... the disinformationalist/deniers can't get around that fact so they ignore it.

Side of the building. We cant see the front because of all the smoke, and limited access from that vantage point as the towers had collapsed, and this ones area was cleared because they thought it might come down. I expect the incredibly huge chunks of concrete, that big assed antenna, and chunks of steel might have done a little more damage than you give it credit for. They were really big buildings. If you have never seen them it is really hard to conceptualize.

the only thing hard to conceptualize is that fire brought those building down.

We also don't have time frames on any of these photos because nobody would think that 8 years later we would be debating whether or not it was hurt enough to fall down.

There is nothing to debate. Those buildings were demo.

So after the area was cleared, we don't know how long people were focused on it, taking pictures from the side of the building not on fire... except to show some fires which had spread to the backside. The fire was [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]bad enough that the firemen didn't think they could contain it.

Where did you get that from?

BTW... those windows were mirrored. It would be damned near impossible to see flames through them in broad daylight. You show those pictures from the undamaged side with fires across multiple floors... but look at them, they are the only broken windows on the backside. The front HALF of the building was engulfed in flame and significantly damaged.

I have seen not one picture showing the front half of the building engulfed in flames ... that's a fantasy on your part.

Okay, I've seen the footage and I only have one more question.
Where is the grassy knoll?

Number 18 .... number 18
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad

I can still remember the awful popping sounds of bodies hitting the pavement as the TV kept taping. GR and his ilk disgust me to the core.

Well I can understand why since I continue to make you look like the dumbass you are. I can completely understand why a disinformationalist like you would be disgusted since no one with sense will buy your bullshit.

They are the worst sort of citizen there is. I'm done with this thread. One of the lowest threads on the RIU forum.

Number 2 ... number 2 ...
2. Become incredulous and indignant
Bu-bye! ... bu-bye! (happy wave here) [/FONT]

I'm sorry... I meant hundreds of tons. Didn't mean to grossly overstate your position.

I am also not saying "heat rises". I said that truss under it failed.

Complete and total bullshit. See all that steel? What happen to it? Where was the resistance it should have caused/
Not to mention he is totally disregarding this report, that was posted way back on page 36
[youtube]Vz43hcKYBm4[/youtube]

As to FLIR...

http://www.prtech-thermalimaging.com/products/infrared_in_action/fact_fiction.htm
https://www.rollitup.org/legal-edge/215663-beat-thermal-imaging.html
https://www.rollitup.org/general-marijuana-growing/217425-how-police-ir-helicopter-functions.html

This link proves nothing ... it certainly doesn't refused the infra red photos that were taken at the scene.

I guarantee you I did more "work" than anyone in that thread.
GR just watches conspiracy youtubes all day and quotes other peoples work. You want to see GR's work?

This is the biggest bullshit statement you have made to date. Oh right ... I'm just suppose to make shit up of my own. Oh that's right ... that's what you do.
I provide the facts, and give the source. Something you seem to have a problem with.

So... if GR is a chick... I have so dated her... I think a lot of us have... you are just happy to escape with your dog... and a restraining order.

You conceded ass ... you would never even get as far as a date. What's makes you think I would date a dummy like you? I wouldn't give you a first look.

 

[fdd2blk]

I already touched on this in my alien attack theory. Nice pic though. Thats exactly what i said happened like 9 pages ago.!

yeah, i know.

 

[fdd2blk]

it would have NEVER gone unnoticed. i said this on page 3.

there is NOWHERE to hide anything in those buildings. the support columns are next to Judy's desk. she's on the phone though, she won't notice a thing.

don't you think after there was already an attempt to blow up buildings that people would be aware of any unusual explosives strapped to the walls?

 

[The Warlord]

What you guys who believe this fail to grasp is that weather the buildings came down or not just the fact that the jets WHERE flown into the buildigs was enough, if this were some plot to "go to war". Bombs weren't really needed. Just hitting the buildings would be enough to justify their reasoning for war. So why go to the extra effort?

It's all a fantasy. Now come out of your secret lair/basement and get on with your life. It was the muslims. Or maybe it was the deathstar and I was right all along! BWWWWAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

 

[fdd2blk]

What you guys who believe this fail to grasp is that weather the buildings came down or not just the fact that the jets WHERE flown into the buildigs was enough, if this were some plot to "go to war". Bombs weren't really needed. Just hitting the buildings would be enough to justify their reasoning for war. So why go to the extra effort?

It's all a fantasy. Now come out of your secret lair/basement and get on with your life. It was the muslims. Or maybe it was the deathstar and I was right all along! BWWWWAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

it was tyler.


[youtube]etvjQSDMAEE[/youtube]

 

[fdd2blk]

what if ............................................ it didn't work?



[youtube]YevmEDd80So[/youtube]


looking at the building, how it's cut out, the pile of bricks strategically placed in front of it, how it rolls perfectly over it all. ... i think this was intentionally done.

 

[The Warlord]

Yes that would have been embarassing.

 

[NoDrama]

what if ............................................ it didn't work?



[youtube]YevmEDd80So[/youtube]


looking at the building, how it's cut out, the pile of bricks strategically placed in front of it, how it rolls perfectly over it all. ... i think this was intentionally done.

Most likely just a big practical joke.

 

[fdd2blk]

Most likely just a big practical joke.

there is no way that was a FAIL. it was way to deliberate. the cut out on the building is pretty obvious. and it rolled over that pile of bricks way too easy. demo guys are pretty good at what they do. they most likely wanted it out of the way. now they can demo it on another lot while they rebuild that one.




it takes a LOT of explosives to destroy a building. someone would have seen the little blinking red lights.

 

[shnkrmn]

I'm astonished the building maintained integrity throughout the roll and even after. You would think once it had turned even 45 degrees from vertical that it would disintegrate. I'm thinking too, that it's not a fail; no demo could turn out quite that badly. Now that I've said that, I await proof of my ignorance!

there is no way that was a FAIL. it was way to deliberate. the cut out on the building is pretty obvious. and it rolled over that pile of bricks way too easy. demo guys are pretty good at what they do. they most likely wanted it out of the way. now they can demo it on another lot while they rebuild that one.




it takes a LOT of explosives to destroy a building. someone would have seen the little blinking red lights.

 

[GrowRebel]

it would have NEVER gone unnoticed. i said this on page 3.

And I posted back on page 80 post 798 and page 129 post 1290 Kevin Ryan essay on how and why those building were demo ... they could have easily put the explosive in under the guise of "construction work" it can be place behind paneling were no one could see it.
In the first part ...

Bremer was on the international advisory board for the Japanese mining and machinery company, Komatsu. At the time, Komatsu had been involved in a joint venture agreement with Dresser Industries, the oil-services/intelligence front in which Prescott Bush Sr. and George H. W. Bush got their start with Neil Mallon. The Komatsu-Dresser mining division operated from 1988 to 1997.In July 1996, it patented a thermite demolition device that could “demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like.”[25] Residues of thermite, the highly energetic chemical mixture, have been confirmed in samples of the WTC dust, and the use of thermite at the WTC was also revealed by environmental data.[1, 2, 3, 4, 26] Dresser Industries merged with Dick Cheney’s Halliburton in 1998.
in the second part ...
Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center (WTC) towers? This is the second essay in a series that attempts to answer that question. The first installment began by considering the tenants that occupied the impact zones and the other floors that might have played a useful role in the demolition of the WTC towers. [1] The result was a picture of connections to organizations that had access to explosive materials and to the expertise required to use explosives. Additionally it was seen that, in the years preceding 9/11, the impact zone tenants had all made structural modifications to the areas where the airliners struck the buildings.
The management representatives of these tenant companies were seen to be secretive and powerful. Through these powerful people, the tenants were connected to organizations that benefited greatly from the 9/11 attacks, including the defense contractors Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Halliburton, and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). The tenants also had strong connections to the Bush family and their corporate network, including Dresser Industries (now Halliburton) and UBS, and to Deutsche Bank and its subsidiaries, reported to have brokered the insider trading deals. There were also links between these tenant companies and the terrorist-financing Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).
How do you explain this?

there is NOWHERE to hide anything in those buildings.

sure there is ... there would be nothing to stop them from tearing out a wall or panel put in the charges and replace everything. It would be no problem what so ever to do that.

the support columns are next to Judy's desk. she's on the phone though, she won't notice a thing.

Not if they are behind the panel in the ceiling or behind a wall how could she?

don't you think after there was already an attempt to blow up buildings that people would be aware of any unusual explosives strapped to the walls?

How they going to see explosives if they are behind the walls?

What you guys who believe this fail to grasp is that weather the buildings came down or not just the fact that the jets WHERE flown into the buildigs was enough, if this were some plot to "go to war". Bombs weren't really needed. Just hitting the buildings would be enough to justify their reasoning for war. So why go to the extra effort?

You really need to stop posting uneducated opinions ... it only makes you look ... see above bright boy.

It's all a fantasy.

Only to disinformationalist/deniers like yourself.

Now come out of your secret lair/basement and get on with your life.

You first ...

It was the muslims.

You nor the government have no proof of that. You are merely parroting what you were told by the war criminals.

Or maybe it was the deathstar and I was right all along! BWWWWAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

or ... maybe you are just too to see what is going on ... it's obvious you have no education in this area ... you simply and expect us to take you seriously ... we don't.

 

[The Warlord]

Dude, your too funny.

So the bombs werent nessecary, they just planted them for funnsies, huh?

 

[fdd2blk]

NO WAY there was construction on multiple floors. i'm simply not buying it. like i said "I have been inside the inner workings of large buildings". there is really NOWHERE to hide. you'd be lucky to have 2 vacant floors in a row. behind what paneling? the telephone closet maybe?

if you worked there, would you have noticed? you have to insult the intelligence of EVERYONE in those buildings to believe any of this crap.

i'm starting to remember why i closed this thread.

 

[The Warlord]

Lol, i'm a DISINFOMATIONALIST! Nice use of the english language!

 

[fdd2blk]

Lol, i'm a DISINFOMATIONALIST! Nice use of the english language!

that's a really bIG word.